Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-pfhbr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T06:27:28.221Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Causality as an Overarching Principle in Physics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2023

James T. Cushing
James T. Cushing*
Affiliation:
University of Notre Dame
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In the recent philosophy of science literature, several authors have stressed the many-faceted and evolving nature of the scientific enterprise. Dudley Shapere (1984, pp. xiii-xv) characterizes a central weakness of the logical empirical program as its focus on the formal logical structure of scientific theories to the exclusion of the process by which these theories were constructed, thus ignoring the possibility of fundamental changes in the nature of science itself. He has stressed the importance of formulating a view of science based on an accurate description of actual scientific practice, which includes attention to how the meaning of a scientific term is rooted in this evolving matrix of practice. Janet Kourany (1982) has attempted” …to lay the foundations for a purely empirical method for establishing a theory of science” (p. 526). In arguing that the a priori has no place in such an approach and in responding to the charge that such an empirical method cannot produce an absolutely fixed set of criteria, Kourany (p. 546) reminds us of Popper’s observation about another empirical enterprise and suggests that we apply this same admonition to our expectations for an empirical method of constructing a theory of science itself.

Type
Part I. Physics
Information
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association , Volume 1986 , Issue 1: Volume One: Contributed Papers 1986 , 1986 , pp. 1 - 11
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

Partial support for the research reported in this paper was provided by the National Science Foundation under grant NSF-SES 83 18884.

References

Asquith, P.D. and Kitcher, P. (eds.) (1984). PSA 1984. Volume 1. East Lansing: Philosophy of Science Association.Google Scholar
Bohr, N. and Kalckar, F. (1937). “On the Transmutation of Atomic Nuclei by Impact of Material Particles”. Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskab Matematisk-fysiske Meddelelser 15(10): 1–40.Google Scholar
Christianson, G.E. (1984). In the Presence of the Creator. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Cushing, J.T. (1984). “The Convergence and Content of Scientific Opinion”. In Asquith and Kitcher (1984). Pages 211–223.Google Scholar
Cushing, J.T. (1985a). “Is There Just One Possible World? Contingency vs the Bootstrap.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 16: 31–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cushing, J.T. (1985b). “The S-Matrix Program - Anatomy of a Scientific Theory.” University of Notre Dame preprint, October, 1985.Google Scholar
Cushing, J.T. (1986). “The Importance of Heisenberg’s S-Matrix Program for the Theoretical High-Energy Physics of the 1950’s.” Centaurus (Forthcoming).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forman, P. (1971). “Weimar Culture, Causality, and Quantum Theory, 1918- 1927: Adaptation by German Physicists and Mathematicians to a Hostile Intellectual Environment” In Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences. Volume 3. Edited by Russell McCormmach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. Pages 1–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gell-Mann, M. Goldberger, M.L. and Thirrin, W.E. (1954). “Use of Causality Conditions in Quantum Theory.” Physical Review 95: 1612–1627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamefuchi, S. et al. (1983). Proceedings of the International Symposium on the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics in the Light of New Technology. Tokyo: The Physical Society of Japan.Google Scholar
Kourany, J.A. (1982). “Towards an Empirically Adequate Theory of Science.” Philosophy of Science 49: 526–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramers, H.A. (1927). “La diffusion de la lumiére par les atoms.” Atti del Congresso Internationale di Fisica. Como 2: 545–557.Google Scholar
Kramers, H.A. (1929). “Die Dispersion und Absorption von Rontgenstrahlen.” Physlkalische Zeitschrift 30: 522–523.Google Scholar
Kronig, R. (1926). “On the Theory of Dispersion of X-Rays.” Journal of the Optical Society of America 12: 547–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laudan, L. (1984). Science and Values. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Nersessian, N. (1986). The Process of Science. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. (Forthcoming).Google Scholar
Nickles, T. (1986). “Twixt Method and Madness.” In Nersessian (1986).Google Scholar
Pickering, A. (1984). Constructing Quarks. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Pickering, A. (1985). “Pragmatic Realism and the Macrosociology of Experiment.” Presented at the BSHS/BSA Conference on “The Uses of Experiment”, Bath, 30th August-2nd September, 1985. Preprint.Google Scholar
Planck, M. (1949). Scientific Autobiography and Other Papers. Westport: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Popper, K. (1935). Logik der Forschung. Wein: J. Springer. (As reprinted as The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York: Harper & Row, 1959.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redhead, M.L.G. (1983). “Nonlocality and Peaceful Coexistence.” In Swinburne (1983). Pages 151–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schützer, W. and Tiomno, J. (1951). “On the Connection of the Scattering and Derivation Matrices with Causality.” Physical Review 83: 249–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schweber, S.S. (1985). “Some Reflections on the History of Particle Physics in the 1950’s.” Presented at the International symposium on Particle Physics in the 1950’s: Pions to Quarks. Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, May 1–4, 1985.Google Scholar
Shapere, D. (1984). Reason and the Search for Knowledge. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Shimony, A. (1983). “Controllable and Uncontrollable Non-Locality. In Kamefuchi et al. (1983). Pages 225–230.Google Scholar
Swinburne, R. (1983). Space Time and Causality. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Co.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teller, P. (1985). “Does the Failure of the Bell Inequalities Spell Trouble for Relativity?” University of Illinois at Chicago Circle preprint (November, 1985).Google Scholar
Weinberg, S. (1977). “The Search for Unity: Notes for a History of Quantum Field Theory.” Daedalus 106: 17–35.Google Scholar
Weisskopf, V. and Wigner, E. (1930). “Berechnung der naturlichen Linienbreite auf Grund der Diracschen Lichttheorie.” Zeitschrift für Physik 63: 54–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wigner, E.P. (1955a). “On the Development of the Compound Nucleus Model.” American Journal of Physics 23: 371–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wigner, E.P. (1955b). “Lower Limit for the Energy Derivative of Scattering Phase Shift.” Physical Review 98: 145–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar