Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-fwgfc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T13:18:28.699Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Darwinism Today—and Tomorrow, But not Yesterday

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2022

Alexande Rosenberg*
Affiliation:
Syracuse University

Extract

A symposium is an occasion for broad brush strokes, and bold theses. We can qualify, indeed repent of these theses at leisure. But i t is only by bringing them into full view in their strongest form, that we may see where the issues lie , and be. instructed about our mistakes by our betters. I certainly count this distinguished company as my betters on the present subject, so I am unwilling to miss this opportunity to be instructed. I shall make claims with which all my fellow-symposiasts should disagree. (Indeed, in a cool hour, I may come to repudiate them too.)

One subject on which I shall have nothing to say is Darwinism-Yesterday, the historical and scholarly questions about what exactly Darwin said or thought. I am also not concerned with the social, psychological, or ideological causes of his and his successors’ beliefs.

Type
Part III. What is Darwinism today?
Copyright
Copyright © 1985 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beatty, J (1982). “The Insights and Oversights of Molecular Genetics: The Place of the Evolutionary Perspective,” In PSA 1982, Volume 1. Edited by Asquith, P.D and Nickles, T. East Lansing: Philosophy of Science Association. Pages 341-355.Google Scholar
Clarke, P.H (1983). “Experimental Evolution.” In Evolution from Molecules to Men. Edited by Bendall, D.C. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pages 235-252.Google Scholar
Ghiselin, Michae (1974). “A Radical Solution to the Species Problem.” Systematic Zoology 23: 536-544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, B.H,. (1983). “Evolution of New Metabolic Functions in Laboratory Organism.” In Evolution of Genes and Proteins. Edited by Nei, M and Koehn, R.K Sunderland, MA: Sinaur. Pages 234-257.Google Scholar
Kauffman, S (1983). “Developmental constraints: internal factors in evolution.” In Development and Evolution. Edited by Goodwin, B.C, Holder, N and Wylie, C.G Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pages 195-225.Google Scholar
Kitcher, P (1982). “Genes.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 33: 337-359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitcher, P (1985). Species. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Lewin, R (1980). “Evolutionary Theory Under Fire.” Science 210: 883-887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malmgren, B.A.; Berggren, H.A,; and Lohmann, G.P (1984). “Species Formation Through Punctuated Gradualism in Panktonic Foraminifera.” Science 225: 317-319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayr, E (1963). Animal Species and Evolution. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milkman, R. (ed.). (1982). Perspectives on Evolution. Sunderland, MA: Sinaur.Google Scholar
Rifkin, J (1983). Algeny. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, A (1985). The Structure of Biological Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stebbins, G.L and Ayala, F (1981). “Is A New Evolutionary Synthesis Necessary?” Science 213: 967-971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stebbins, G.L (1982). “Model Themes: A New Framework for Evolutionary Syntheses.” In Milkman (1982). Pages 1-14.Google Scholar
Steele, E (1979). Somatic Selection and Adaptive Evolution. Toronto: Williams and Wallace.Google Scholar
Thompson, P (1983). “The Structure of Evolutionary Theory: A Semantic Approach.” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 14: 215-229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, M.B (1970). “Deducing the Consequences of Evolution.” journal of the theoretical Biology 29: 343-385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar