No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Herbert Feigl: 1902-1988
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 February 2022
Extract
Herbert Feigl was born December 14, 1902 in Reichenberg, Austria, and he died in Minneapolis, Minnesota, on June 1,1988. His wife, Maria, followed him in death on February 13,1989. He is survived by a son, Eric O. Feigl, who is professor of physiology at the University of Washington.
Feigl's parents were Jewish but not religious; indeed, his father was an outspoken atheist. His father was a weaver and later an influential textile manufacturer, who would have preferred the son to become an industrial chemist. His mother was a devotee of the arts and an amateur pianist, who would play Beethoven sonatas over and over at the young son's request. His high school interests were philosophy, science fiction, physics, and chemistry (which was his major). Moritz Schlick became his favorite philosopher after he read the latter's Allgemeine Erkenntnisslehre. His chief intellectual hero was Einstein.
- Type
- Part II. Herbert Feigl Remembered
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 1989 by the Philosophy of Science Association
References
Ayer, A.J. (1936), Language, Truth, and Logic, London: Oxford University Press. Second revised edition, Gollancz, London, 1946.Google Scholar
Blumberg, A.E. and Feigl, H. (1931), “Logical Positivism, A New Movement in European Philosophy”, Journal of Philosophy, 28:281–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnap, R. (1928), Der Logische Aufbau der Welt, Weltkreis-Verlag, Berlin-Schlactensee. Translated by George, R. A., The Logical Structure of the World, University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1969.Google Scholar
Feigl, H. (1927), Zufall und Gesetz, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Vienna.Google Scholar
Feigl, H. (1929), Theorie und Erfahrung in der Physik, G. Braun, Karlsruhe. English translation of chapter III in Feigl 1980, pp. 116-144.Google Scholar
Feigl, H. (1930), Wahrscheinslichkeit und Erfahrung”, Erkenntnis, 1: 249–259. Translated as “Probability and Experience” in Feigl 1980, pp. 107-115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feigl, H. (1958), “The ‘Mental’ and the ‘Physical’”. In Feigl and Scriven, pp. 370-497.Google Scholar
Feigl, H. (1967),“The ‘Mental’ and the ‘Physical’: The Essay and a Postscript”, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Feigl, H. (1969), “The Wiener Kreis in America”. In Fleming, D., and Bailyn, B. (eds.), The Intellectual Migration 1930-1960, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, pp. 630–673. Reprinted in Feigl 1980, pp. 57-94.Google Scholar
Feigl, H. (1974a), “Empiricism at Bay?”. In Cohen, R. S. and Wartofsky, M. W. (eds.), Methodological and Historical Essays in the Natural and Social Sciences. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Volume XIV, Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 1–20. Reprinted in Feigl 1980, pp. 269-285.Google Scholar
Feigl, H. (1974b), “No Pot of Message”. In Bertocci, P. (ed.), Mid-Twentieth Century Philosophy: Personal Statements. New York: Humanities Press, pp. 120–139. Reprinted in Feigl (1980), pp. 1-20.Google Scholar
Feigl, H. (1980), Inquiries and Provocations: Selected Writings 1929-1974. Edited by Cohen, Robert S.. Vienna Circle Collection, Volume XIV, Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Feigl, H. and Sellars, W. (eds.) (1949). Readings in Philosophical Analysis. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Feigl, H. and Brodbeck, M. (eds.) (1953). Readings in the Philosophy of Science. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Feigl, H. and Scriven, M. (eds.) (1956). The Foundations of Science and the Concepts of Psychology and Psychoanalysis. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Volume I. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Feigl, H., Scriven, M., and Maxwell, G. (eds.), Concepts, Theories, and the Mind-body Problem, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Volume II. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 1958.Google Scholar
Feigl, H. and Maxwell, G. (eds.) (1961). Current Issues in the Philosophy of Science. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
Feigl, H. and Maxwell, G. (eds.) (1962). Scientific Explanation, Space, and Time. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Volume III. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Feigl, H., Sellars, W. and Lehrer, K. (eds.) (1972). New Readings in Philosophical Analysis. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Feyerabend, P.K. and Maxwell, G. (eds.) (1966). Mind, Matter, and Method: Essays in Philosophy of Science in Honor of Herbert Feigl. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Hempel, C.G. (1950), “Problems and Changes in the Empiricist Criterion of Meaning”, Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 11:41–63.Google Scholar
Neurath, O., Carnap, R. and Morris, C. (eds.) (1938-69). International Encyclopedia of Unified Science, Volumes 1 and 2. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Popper, K. (1935), Logik der Forschung, Vienna: J. Springer. Translated by the author. The Logic of Scientific Discovery, New York: Basic Books, 1959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichenbach, H. (1938), Experience and Prediction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Salmon, W. (1967), The Foundations of Scientific Inference. Pitsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlick, M. (1918), Allgemeine Erkenntnislehre. Berlin: J. Springer. Second edition, 1925. Translated by Blumberg, A.E., with an introduction by Blumberg and Feigl. General Theory of Knowledge. New York: J. Springer, 1974.Google Scholar
Smart, J.J.C. (1959), “Sensations and Brain Processes”. Philosophical Review, 68:141–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar