Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-30T12:13:46.143Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The History and Philosophy of Quantum Field Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2022

Don Robinson*
Affiliation:
University of Illinois, Chicago

Extract

In November of 1925 Born, Heisenberg and Jordan wrote an article together in which they demonstrated that Einstein's energy fluctuation formula could be derived from quantum mechanics. They remark that the equations are subject to reinterpretation. Specifically, the states of radiation oscillators can be reinterpreted as numbers of quanta of radiation. They also connected this latter idea up with Bose-Einstein statistics. Heisenberg wrote to Pauli that it was Jordan who contributed the idea of reinterpreting the terms. This was the first step toward quantum field theory. In August of the following year Dirac derived Einstein's A and B coefficients for induced transitions between states but on the assumption that the electromagnetic field could be treated classically (Dirac 1927). In 1927 Dirac lay the mathematical foundations for quantum electrodynamics. Early that year he combined quantum mechanics, special relativity, and radiation theory in treating the electromagnetic field as if it were an infinite collection of oscillators.

Type
Part III. Fields, Particles and Quantum Theories
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

I would like to gratefully acknowledge the support of the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (postdoctoral fellowship 756-92-0294).

References

Binder, K. (1976), “Monte Carlo Investigations of Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena”, Domb, C. and Green, M.S. (eds.) Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena, Volume 5b. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Brown, H. and Harré, R. (1988), Philosophical Foundations of Quantum Field Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, L., Dresden, M., and Hoddeson, L. (1983), The Birth of Particle Physics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, L., Dresden, M., and Hoddeson, L. (1989), Pions to Quarks: Particle Physics in the 1950's. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cushing, J. (1990), Theory Construction and Selection in Modern Physics: The S-Matrix. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Creutz, M. (1983), Quarks, Gluons and Lattices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dirac, P. (1927), “The quantum theory of the emission and absorption of radiation”, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A114: 243265.Google Scholar
Dirac, P. (1928a), “The quantum theory of the electron”, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A117: 610624.Google Scholar
Dirac, P. (1928b), “The quantum theory of the electron: Part II”, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A118: 351361.Google Scholar
Dirac, P. (1978), Directions in Physics. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Dirac, P. (1981), “Does Renormalization Make Sense?”, Duke, D. and Owens, J. (eds.), Perturbative Quantum Chromodynamics. New York: AIP Conference Proceedings no. 74.Google Scholar
Fleming, G. (1988), “Hyperplane-dependent Quantized Fields and Lorentz Invariance”, Brown and Harre (eds.) 1988: 93-116.Google Scholar
Haag, R. (1992), Local Quantum Physics: Fields, Particles, Algebras. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harré, R. (1988), “Parsing the Amplitudes”, Brown and Harré (eds.) 1988: 59-72.Google Scholar
Itzykson, C. and Drouffe, J. (1989) Statistical Field Theory Volume 2: Strong coupling, Monte Carlo methods, conformal field theory, and random systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kogut, J. (1979), “An Introduction to Lattice Gauge Theory and Spin SystemsReviews of Modern Physics 51: 659713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kogut, J. (1983), “The Lattice Gauge Theory Approach to Quantum ChromodynamicsReviews of Modern Physics 55: 775837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kragh, H. (1990), Dirac: A Scientific Biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pais, A. (1986), Inward Bound: Of Matter and Forces in the Physical World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Prugovečki, E. (1984), Stochastic Quantum Mechanics and Quantum Spacetime: Consistent Unification of Relativity and Quantum Theory based on Stochastic Spaces. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prugovečki, E. (1994), “Foundational Aspects of Quantum Electrodynamics”, Foundations of Physics 24: 343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rajaraman, R. (1989), Solitons and Instantons. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Rebbi, C. (1983), Lattice Gauge Theories and Monte Carlo Simulations. Singapore, World Scientific.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redhead, M. (1983), “Quantum Field Theory for Philosophers”, Asquith, P. and Nickles, T. (eds.) PSA 1982, East Lansing, Philosophy of Science Association, Vol. 2, pp. 5799.Google Scholar
Saunders, S. and Brown, H. (1991), The Philosophy of Vacuum. Oxford: Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schweber, S. (1994), QED and the Men Who Made it: Dyson, Frynman, Schwinger, and Tomonaga. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwinger, J. (1958), Quantum Electrodynamics. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Velo, G. and Wightman, A. (1973), Constructive Field Theory. Berlin, Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velo, G. and Wightman, A. (1990), Constructive Field Theory II. Berlin, Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Weingard, R.Virtual Particles and the Interpretation of Quantum Field Theory”, Brown and Harre (eds.), 1988: 43-58.Google Scholar