Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qs9v7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T12:27:49.347Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some Epistemological Aspects of Recent Work in Visual Perception

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2022

John Heffner
John Heffner*
Affiliation:
Lebanon Valley College
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In adults and even in small children, visual perception is framed against a richly developed and relatively stable cognitive background. This background affects vision itself. Experimental evidence in cognitive psychology shows that the effects of this background on visual perception are logically immediate and not the products of reasoning or of deliberation. Nor are the effects of this cognitive background discovered solely in the patterns of use which the perceiver makes of visually received information. In this paper three of the principle aspects of epistemological treatments of visual perception are assessed in view of the cognitive structuring of the visual process. First, traditional distinctions among the sensory, phenomenal, and cognitive aspects of the visual process prove to be less clear than formerly they were thought to be. Second, the concept of perceptual strategies is argued to be reasonable and fruitful in the epistemological analysis of the visual process.

Type
Part V. Epistemological Foundations of Science
Information
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association , Volume 1976 , Issue 1: Volume One: Contributed Papers 1976 , 1976 , pp. 165 - 174
Copyright
Copyright © 1976 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ayer, A.J. The Problem of Knowledge. New York: Macmillan, 1956.Google Scholar
Bohm, David. “Physics and Perception.” In The Special Theory of Relativity. New York: W.A. Benjamin, Inc., 1965. Pages 185-230.Google Scholar
Broad, C.D. The Mind and Its Place in Nature. London:: Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd., 1925.Google Scholar
Bruner, Jerome S., et al. Studies in Cognitive Growth. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1966.Google Scholar
Chisholm, R.M. Perceiving: A Philosophical Study. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1957.Google Scholar
Hamlyn, D.W. The Psychology of Perception. London:: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1969.Google Scholar
Hanson, N.R. Perception and Discovery. San Francisco: Freeman, Cooper, & Company, 1969.Google Scholar
Harris, Errol Hypotheses and Perception.. London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd., 1970.Google Scholar
Heffner, John. The Epistemology of Binocular Vision. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Boston University, 1976. Xerox University Microfilm Publication Number 76-6641.Google Scholar
James, William. The Principles of Psychology. New York: Henry Holt & Company, 1890.Google Scholar
Miller, G.A., Galanter, Eugene and Pribram, Karl. Plans and the Structure of Behavior. New York: Henry Holt and Company, 1960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, G.E. “Proof of an External World.” In Philosophical Papers London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd., 1959. Pages 127-150.Google Scholar
Mundle, C.W.K. Perception: Facts and Theories. London: Oxford University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Price, H.H. Perception. (2nd ed.).London: Methuen & Company, Ltd., 1950.Google Scholar
Reid, Thomas. Essays on the Intellectual Powers of Man. Cambridge: The M.I.T. Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Shimony, Abner. “Is Observation Theory-Laden? A Problem in Naturalistic Epistemology.” Unpublished typescript, 1974, forthcoming in a volume of the University of Pittsburgh series in philosophy of science.Google Scholar
Warnock, G.J. “On What is Seen.” In Perception: A Philosophical Symposium. Edited by F.N. Sibley. London: Methuen & Company, Ltd., 1971. Pages 1-11.Google Scholar