Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qlrfm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T21:26:49.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

String Theory, Quantum Gravity and Locality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2022

Cyrus C. Taylor*
Affiliation:
Case Western Reserve University

Extract

In this talk, I'd like to explain a little bit about what string theory is, why theoretical physicists are so excited about it, and why I think that it will have a rather profound impact on some of our ideas about the structure of the physical world.

Let me begin by reviewing the way we think about quantum mechanical particles in a relativistic setting. The classical dynamics of the theory is specified by assuming that the action for a given particle trajectory is proportional to the relativistic interval traversed by the particle. If one sets up a canonical formalism with the variable parametrizing the particle trajectory playing the role of time, then one finds that the four-momentum of the particle is constrained, with the constraint just being the relativistic relation between the mass, energy, and three-momentum of a particle. The particle thus lives on a subspace of the full phase space, and one finds that on this subspace, the Hamiltonian for the system vanishes.

Type
Part IV. Physics
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Candelas, P., Horowitz, G., Strominger, A. and Witten, E. (1985), “Vacuum Configurations for Superstrings”, Nucl. Phys. B258,46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casher, A., et al.,Consistent Superstrings as Solutions of the D=26 Bosonic String Theory”, Phys. Lett. 162B, 121.Google Scholar
D'Hoker, E. and Phong, D. H. (1988), “The Geometry of String Perturbation Theory”, Rev. Mod. Phys. 60, 917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eliezer, D. A., and Woodard, R. P. (1989), “The Problem of Nonlocality in String Theory”, Brown HET-693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gepner, D. (1988/89), “Yukawa Couplings for Calabi-Yau String Compactifications”, Nucl. Phys. B311, 191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giddings, S., Martinec, E. and Witten, E. (1986), Phys. Lett. 176B, 362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goroff, M. and Sagnotti, A. (1986), “The Ultraviolet Behavior of Einstein Gravity”, Nucl. Phys. B266, 709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, M. B., Schwarz, J. S., and Witten, E. (1987), Superstring Theory. (Two volumes). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gross, D. and Jevicki, A. (1987), “Operator Formulation of Interacting String Field Theory”, Nucl. Phys. B283, 1.Google Scholar
Horowitz, G., Lykken, J., Rohm, R. and Strominger, A. (1986), “A Purely Cubic Action for String Field Theory”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 283.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Itzykson, C. and Zuber, J.-B. (1980), Quantum Field Theory. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Mohapatra, P. (1988), “Comments on Possible New Three Generation Calabi Yau Manifolds”, Phys. Lett. 214B, 199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rusjan, E. and Senjanovic, G. (1988), “Honest Symmetries and Complex Structures of the Three-Generation Superstring Model”, Phys. Lett. 214B, 193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scherk, J. (1975), “An Introduction to the Theory of Dual Models and Strings”, Rev. Mod. Phys. 47, 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witten, E. (1986), “Non-Commutative Geometry and String Field Theory”, Nucl. Phys. B268, 253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witten, E. (1988a), “Quantum Field Theory and the Jones Polynomial”, to appear in Comm. Math. Phys.Google Scholar
Witten, E. (1988b), “2+1 Dimensional Gravity as an Exactly Soluble System”, to appear in Nucl. Phys. B.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yau, S.-T. (1985), “Compact Three Dimensional Kahler Manifolds with Zero Ricci Curvature”, in Symposium on Anomalies, Geometry, Topology, Bardeen, W. and White, (eds.). Singapore: World Scientific, p. 395.Google Scholar