Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-08T02:44:48.067Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Editorial

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2007

Roger Hughes
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Editorial
Information
Public Health Nutrition , Volume 7 , Issue 5 , August 2004 , pp. 585 - 586
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2004

References

1Cannon, G. Why the Bush administration and the global sugar industry are determined to demolish the 2004 WHO global strategy on diet, physical activity and health. Public Health Nutrition 2004; 7: 369–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2Nestle, M. Food company sponsorship of nutrition research and professional activities: a conflict of interest? [Commentary]. Public Health Nutrition 2001; 4: 1015–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Dixon, J, Sindall, C, Banwell, C. Exploring the intersectoral partnerships guiding Australia's dietary advice. Health Promotion International 2004; 19: 5–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Cannon, G. Out of the Box. Public Health Nutrition 2004; 7: 253–6.Google Scholar
5Caraher, M, Coveney, J. Public health nutrition and food policy. Public Health Nutrition 2004; 7: 591–8.Google Scholar
6Margetts, B. Editorial. Public Health Nutrition 2003; 6: 727–8.Google Scholar
7Berti, PR, Krasavec, J, FitzGereld, S. A review of the effectiveness of agriculture interventions in improving nutrition outcomes. Public Health Nutrition 2004; 7: 599–609.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed