Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-vt8vv Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-08-17T01:00:25.892Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Letter to the Editor

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2007

Mark Lawrence*
Affiliation:
School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences Deakin University Melbourne, Australia Email: mark.lawrence@deakin.edu.au
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Letter to the Editor
Copyright
Copyright © The Author 2007

Synthetic folic acid vs. food folates

Sir,

In his replyReference Cannon1 to my recent letterReference Lawrence2, Geoffrey Cannon queried whether the synthetic nature of folic acid might independently be a problematic factor in the planning of a mandatory fortification policy. If so, what implications are there for all other synthesised nutrients used as supplements and fortificants? Also, is there any evidence that unusually high consumption of folate from foods could do any harm?

Several studies have reported pharmacokinetic differences in absorption and metabolism between synthetic folic acid and food folates. For example, Kelly et al. report that the substance's form has different effects on folate-binding proteins and transportersReference Kelly, McPartlan, Goggins, Weir and Scott3. They found that folic acid can be passively absorbed and interacts differently from 5-methyltetrahydrofolic acid, which is the substrate made available from dietary folates. This is a complex area. Discrepancies in the evidence base for the relative bioavailability of natural folates compared with folic acid have been identifiedReference Sanderson, McNulty, Mastroiacovo, McDowell, Melse-Boonstra and Finglas4.

Clearly, there are many unknowns about the absorption and metabolism of synthetic folic acid (other synthesised nutrients need to be considered on a case by case basis). Mandatory folic acid fortification would result in the target group and the population as a whole being exposed to historically unprecedented raised levels of folic acid over extended periods of time. Hence, there is a need to conduct a particularly comprehensive risk–benefit analysis for such an intervention.

I am not aware of any evidence that unusually high consumption of folate from foods could do harm. This lack of evidence probably has more to do with self-regulation than with the form of the substance. Many authorities have set the upper level of safety for folic acid at 1000 μg day− 1, and exclude food folates from this estimate (the estimate is based on studies in which supplemental folic acid was taken in addition to diet). Hypothetically, and drawing on the dietary folate equivalent calculation, 1000 μg of folic acid as a fortificant would equate approximately to an additional 1700 μg  of food folates per day – that is a lot of fruits and vegetables to eat!

References

1Cannon, G. Response from Geoffrey Cannon. Public Health Nutrition 2006; 9: 829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Lawrence, M. Mandatory folic acid fortification and the science of ‘sociality’. Public Health Nutrition 2006; 9: 827–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Kelly, P, McPartlan, J, Goggins, M, Weir, DG, Scott, JM. Unmetabolised folic acid in serum: acute studies in subjects consuming fortified foods and supplements. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1997; 65: 1790–5.Google Scholar
4Sanderson, P, McNulty, H, Mastroiacovo, P, McDowell, IF, Melse-Boonstra, A, Finglas, PM, et al. . Folate bioavailability: UK Food Standards Agency workshop report. British Journal of Nutrition 2003; 90: 473–9.Google Scholar