Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qs9v7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T18:21:51.491Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

MAPPIT 2: Second Generation High-resolution Imaging at the AAT

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2016

J. G. Robertson*
Affiliation:
School of Physics, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia European Southern Observatory, Karl-Schwarzschild-Str. 2, D-85748 Garching, Federal Republic of, Germanyg.robertson@physics.usyd.edu.au
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Interferometric methods have been used at a number of observatories to improve the spatial resolution of large optical telescopes, approaching and in some cases reaching the diffraction limit. The principal methods used have been speckle interferometry and non-redundant masking (NRM). The MAPPIT (Masked APerture Plane Interference Telescope) instrument has been used for NRM observations at the 3·9 m Anglo-Australian Telescope. This paper describes a proposed instrument, MAPPIT 2, which would use a Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor in parallel with an interferometer performing NRM or one-dimensional speckle interferometry. The inclusion of the data from the wavefront sensor will enhance the sensitivity of the instrument, especially for the imaging of relatively complex objects (those giving more than a few resolution elements with non-zero intensities). Limiting the instantaneous spatial resolution to one dimension allows available CCD detectors to operate with 100% duty cycle. Observations at a number of position angles allow two-dimensional images to be obtained.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of Australia 1997

References

Andersen, T. (ed.) 1992, Wavefront-supported Post-facto Image Correction, Nordic Optical Telescope Scientific Association MiniworkshopGoogle Scholar
Beckers, J. M. 1993, ARA&A, 31, 13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bedding, T. R., Robertson, J. G., & Marson, R. G. 1994, A&A, 290, 340 Google Scholar
Buscher, D. F., Haniff, C. A., Baldwin, J. E., & Warner, P. J. 1990, MNRAS, 245, 7PGoogle Scholar
Davis, J. 1994, Very High Angular Resolution Imaging, ed. J. G. Robertson and W. J. Tango (Dordrecht: Kluwer), p. 135 Google Scholar
Gonglewski, J. D., & Dayton, D. 1992, in Wavefront-supported Post-facto Image Correction, ed. T. Andersen (Nordic Optical Telescope Scientific Association Miniworkshop), p. 18Google Scholar
Haniff, C. A. 1989, in Diffraction-limited Imaging with Very Large Telescopes, ed. D. M. Alloin & J.-M. Mariotti (Dordrecht: Kluwer), p. 171 Google Scholar
Labeyrie, A. 1970, A&A, 6, 85 Google Scholar
Marais, T., Michau, V., Fertin, G., Primot, J., & Fontanella, J. C. 1992, in High Resolution Imaging by Interferometry II, ed. F. Merkle (Munich: European Southern Observatory), p. 589 Google Scholar
Primot, J., Rousset, G., & Fontanella, J. C. 1990, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 7, 1598 Google Scholar
Weigelt, G., Baier, G., Ebersberger, J., Fleischmann, F., Hofmann, K.-H., & Ladebeck, R. 1986, Opt. Eng., 25, 706 Google Scholar
Wilson, R. W., Baldwin, J. E., Buscher, D. F., & Warner, P. J. 1992, MNRAS, 257, 369 Google Scholar