Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-sh8wx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T09:37:46.641Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pollen Grains in Lake Sediments: Pollen Percentages in Surface Sediments from Southern Michigan1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

M. B. Davis ,
L. B. Brubaker  and
J. M. Beiswenger
M. B. Davis
Affiliation:
Great Lakes Research Division, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104
L. B. Brubaker
Affiliation:
Great Lakes Research Division, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104
J. M. Beiswenger
Affiliation:
Great Lakes Research Division, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Pollen in surface sediments from five lakes in southern Michigan shows evidence of differential deposition. In most lakes, pollen from ragweed occurs in a higher ratio to tree pollen in shallow-water sediment than in deep water. Pine and certain herbs with small pollen grains follow the same pattern. One very deep lake is an exception, with the ratio of ragweed to tree pollen highest in deep-water sediment. Pollen from local aquatics and from willow, which grows along the lake shore, is also unevenly distributed, occurring in highest frequencies near the parent plants. Pollen from deciduous trees, however, occurs in similar ratios at all sampling stations within each lake. Deciduous pollen occurs in uniform ratios, also in older sediment, deposited in the early 19th century, when the landscape was still forested.

Percentages of deciduous tree pollen (as percent tree pollen) were compared among lakes. Single samples were taken for this purpose from the deepest part of each lake basin. Oak pollen percentages are higher in three lakes in western Washtenaw County than in three lakes in eastern Washtenaw County. This difference reflects a similar difference in present-day vegetation: second-growth oak forests grow near the lakes in the western half of the county, while all but 5% of the area in the eastern part of the county is farmland. (The difference in the ratio of farmland to forestland in the two parts of the county is not reflected clearly in the ratio of herb pollen to tree pollen, because there is so much variation within each lake.) In 140-year-old sediment, on the other hand, tree pollen percentages in the six samples are homogeneous as shown by a chi-square test. The homogeneity in sediment deposited before the forest was cleared is surprising, because witness-tree data from presettlement time show that the frequencies of tree species in the two areas were quite different. Pollen dispersal at that time must have been effective enough, to counteract differences over distances of a few tens of kilometers in the amounts and kinds of pollen produced by the vegetation.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Quaternary Research , Volume 1 , Issue 4 , December 1971 , pp. 450 - 467
Copyright
University of Washington

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anonymous, . (1881). “History of Washtenaw County, Michigan.” Chas. C. Chapman & Co., Chicago.Google Scholar
Davis, M.B. (1968). Pollen grains in lake sediments: redeposition caused by seasonal water circulation. Science 162, 796–799.Google Scholar
Davis, M.B. Redeposition of pollen grains in lake sediments. Limnology and Oceanography, in press.Google Scholar
Davis, R.B. (1967). Pollen studies of near-surface sediments in Maine lakes. In “Quaternary Paleoecology.” (Cushing, E.J. and Wright, H.E. Jr., Eds.), pp. 143–173 Yale Press New Haven Google Scholar
Davis, R.B., Brewster, L.A., and Sutherland, J. (1969). Variation in pollen spectra within lakes Pollen et Spores 11 557–572.Google Scholar
Faegri, K., and Iversen, J. (1964). “Textbook of Pollen Analysis,” 2nd ed. Munksgaard Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Fries, M. (1962). Pollen profiles of late Pleistocene and Recent sediments from Weber Lake, Minnesota. Ecology 43, 295–308.Google Scholar
Janssen, C.R. (1966). Recent pollen spectra from the deciduous and coniferous-deciduous forests of northeastern Minnesota: A study in pollen dispersal. Ecology 47, 804–825.Google Scholar
Kabaleine, M. (1970). On formation of pollen spectra and restoration of vegetation (In Russian, English Summary). Ministry of Geology of the USSR, Inst. of Geol. (Vilnius) Trans., Vol. II, 147 p.Google Scholar
McAndrews, J. (1966). Postglacial history of prairie, savanna and forest in northwestern Minnesota. Torrey Botanical Club Memoir 22, 72 pp.Google Scholar
Merk, J.W. (1951). “Tree Species Distribution on the Basis of the Original Land Survey of Washtenaw County, Michigan.” M.S. thesis, University of Michigan Google Scholar
Phleger, F.B. (1951). Ecology of Foraminifera, northwest Gulf of Mexico: Part 1. Foraminifera distribution. Geological Society of America Memoir 46, 1–88.Google Scholar
Pohl, F. (1937). Die Pollenerzeugung der Windblütler. Beih. Bot. Centralbl.. 56 A, 365–470.Google Scholar
Rowley, J.R., and Dahl, A.O. (1956). Modifications in design and use of the Livingstone piston sampler. Ecology 37, 849–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tauber, H. (1967). Differential pollen dispersion and filtration. In “Quaternary Paleoecology.” Cushing, E.J. Wright, H.E. Jr., Eds.), pp. 131–141. Yale Press, New Haven.Google Scholar