Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-7nlkj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-30T18:53:22.336Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Tutoring learning disabled children using cognitive strategy training techniques

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2015

Robyn Gillies*
Affiliation:
Ipswich District Special Services Centre
Get access

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effect of a peer tutoring program that was implemented to improve the reading skills of a group of learning disabled children. The study used peer tutoring strategies in conjunction with cognitive strategy training techniques to change the reading behaviours of both the tutors and tutees. Emphasis was attached to ensuring that reciprocal benefits would be derived by both the tutors and tutees by sharing a task on which there was room for both to gain in skill. The results indicated that learning disabled children can be tutored by peers who are only slightly better readers and that reading gains accrued to both parties.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Campbell, D.T., & Stanley, J.C. (1966) Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand, McNally & Co. Google Scholar
Clay, M.M. (1979) The early detection of reading difficulties: A diagnostic survey with recovery procedures (2nd ed.). Auckland: Hineman Educational.Google Scholar
Glynn, T., & McNaughton, S. (1985) The Mangere home and social reading procedures: Continuing research on their effectiveness. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 15, 6677.Google Scholar
Jacobs, L. (1984) Cognition and learning disabilities. Teaching Exceptional Children, 16, 213218.Google Scholar
Johnson, D.W., & Ahgren, A. (1976) Relationships between student attitudes about cooperation and competition and attitudes towards schooling. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68 (1), 92102.10.1037/0022-0663.68.1.92Google Scholar
Kazdin, A.E. (1977) Assessing the clinical or applied importance of behavior change through social validation. Behavior Modification, 1 (4), 427453.10.1177/014544557714001Google Scholar
Limbrick, L., McNaughton, S., & Glynn, T. (1985) Reading gains for underachieving tutors and tutees in a cross-age tutoring program. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 26 (6), 939953.10.1111/j.1469-7610.1985.tb00608.x4066818Google Scholar
Melser, G.A. (1980) Story box series. Shortland Publications: Auckland, New Zealand.Google Scholar
McGinnis, E., & Goldstein, A. (1984) Skillstreaming the elementary school child. Research Press: Champaign, Ill. Google Scholar
Morgan, R., & Lyon, E. (1979) Paired reading: A preliminary report on a technique for parental tuition of reading retarded children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 20, 151160.10.1111/j.1469-7610.1979.tb00495.x457825Google Scholar
Palinscar, A., & Brown, A. (1987) Enhancing instructional time through attention to metacognition. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20 (2), 6675.10.1177/0022219487020002013559367Google Scholar
Ryan, E.B., Short, E., & Weed, K. (1986) The role of cognitive strategy training in improving the academic performance of learning disabled children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19, (9), 521529.10.1177/0022219486019009023537180Google Scholar
Sheinker, A., Sheinker, J., & Stevens, L. (1984) Cognitive strategies for teaching the mildly handicapped. Focus on Exceptional Children, 17 (1), 115.Google Scholar
Tarver, S.G. (1986) Cognitive behavior modification, direct instruction and holistic approaches to the education of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19 (6), 368375.10.1177/0022219486019006133734622Google Scholar