Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-m9pkr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T08:31:09.228Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Impact of Optional Preferential Voting on the 2001 Queensland State Election

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2016

Stephen Stockwell
Get access

Abstract

During the 2001 Queensland state election, the Australian Labor Party's (ALP) ‘Just Vote 1’ campaign message sought to limit preference exchange among conservative parties. This paper analyses the impact of this tactic that produced a 53.6 per cent increase in the exhausted vote over the last election. The size of the landslide to Labor made this tactic irrelevant but it affected the outcome in five seats and could have been decisive in a closer election. The concern is raised that the optional preferential system produces a less representative and less democratic outcome than the compulsory preferential system.

Type
Special Theme: Queensland: The Smart State
Information
Queensland Review , Volume 10 , Issue 1 , May 2003 , pp. 155 - 162
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, D., 1979, ‘New South Wales - Electoral reform’. Australian Quarterly, 51. June: 110–111.Google Scholar
Black, D., 1958, The theory of committees and elections, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.Google Scholar
Electoral and Administrative Review Commission (EARC) 1990, Report on Queensland Legislative Assembly Electoral System 2 volumes, EARC, Brisbane.Google Scholar
Electoral Commission of Queensland (ECQ) 2001, Queensland Election 2001: Statistical Returns, ECQ, Brisbane.Google Scholar
Franklin, M., 2001, ‘Voters confused by party dealing’, Courier-Mail, 24 January: 8.Google Scholar
Fraser, C., 1996, ‘Plastic rights: reading the freedom of political communication out of Langer v Commonwealth of Australia and Others’, Ormond Papers, 13: 77–90.Google Scholar
Green, A., 1995, ‘Why the odds are against Labor. Sydney Morning Herald, 18 Setember: 13.Google Scholar
Horowitz, D., 1990, ‘Presidents vs. parliaments: Comparing democratic systems’, Journal of Democracy 1(4), Fall: 73–79.Google Scholar
Mitchell, P., 2000, ‘Voters and their representatives: electoral institutions and delegation in parliamentary democracies’, European Journal of Political Research 37(3), May: 335–351.Google Scholar
Reilly, B., 1997, ‘Preferential voting and political engineering: a comparative study’, Journal of Commonwealth and Comparative Politics, 35(1): 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wanna, J., 1999, ‘Queensland’ The Australian Journal of Politics and History 45(4): 572.Google Scholar
Wright, J.F.H., 1980, Mirror of the Nation's Mind: Australia's Electoral Experiments, Hale & Iremonger, Sydney.Google Scholar