Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-tdptf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-24T11:27:36.518Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Seasonal Variations of Radiocarbon Content in Plant Leaves in a 14C-Depleted Area

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 February 2016

Rana Baydoun*
Affiliation:
Lebanese Atomic Energy Commission- National council for Scientific Research, Beirut, Lebanon
Omar El Samad
Affiliation:
Lebanese Atomic Energy Commission- National council for Scientific Research, Beirut, Lebanon
Bilal Nsouli
Affiliation:
Lebanese Atomic Energy Commission- National council for Scientific Research, Beirut, Lebanon
Ghassan Younes
Affiliation:
Beirut Arab University, Faculty of Sciences, Chemistry Department, Dibbieh, Lebanon
*
2.Corresponding author. Email: rbaydoun@cnrs.edu.lb.

Abstract

The determination of radiocarbon content in biogenic samples such as tree leaves and short-lived plants is crucial when studying the anthropogenic impact on the ecosystem and for detecting any alteration in stable and radioactive CO2. A total of 76 samples of evergreen and deciduous tree leaves as well seasonal plants were collected in winter, spring, and summer. Sampling was carried out from rural villages located in Mount Lebanon Province, Lebanon. Based on the data obtained from a previous study carried out in autumn, which showed that the selected sites are characterized by depletion of 14C caused by the releases of pollutants and CO2 from a cement factory in the region, further investigation was carried out in the present work to determine possible significant seasonal variations in Δ14C values. Reference samples of identical species were collected in the same period from a clean zone. The conventional 14C method was used to determine the carbon isotopic ratio. Δ14C data are compared to those obtained in autumn. 14C concentration in the studied sites was significantly lower than in the clean area in all seasons. ANOVA tests showed that there is a significant seasonal variation for deciduous leaves and seasonal plants, while this difference was not significant in evergreen leaves. In addition, no significant variation was recognized for different species in the same season.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2015 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baydoun, R, El Samad, O, Aoun, M, Nsouli, B, Younes, G. 2014. Set-up, optimization and first set of samples at the Radiocarbon Laboratory in Lebanon. Geochronometria 41:8791.Google Scholar
Baydoun, R, El Samad, O, Aoun, M, Nsouli, B, Younes, G. 2015. Measurement of radiocarbon content in leaves near a cement factory in Mount Lebanon. Radiocarbon 57(1):153–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chabarekh, C. 2010. Air quality. In: State and Trends of the Lebanese Environment. 1st edition. Lebanon: Ministry of Environment. p 101–36.Google Scholar
Knoll, GF. 2010. Radiation Detection and Measurement. 4th edition. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Levin, I, Kromer, B, Hammer, S. 2013. Atmospheric Δ14CO2 trend in Western European background air from 2000 to 2012. Tellus B 65:20092, http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/tellus.v65i0.20092.Google Scholar
Molnár, M, Bujtás, T, Svingor, É, Futó, I, Světlik, I. 2007. Monitoring of atmospheric excess 14C around Paks nuclear power plant, Hungary. Radiocarbon 49(2):1031–43.Google Scholar
Muraki, Y, Masua, K, Arslanov, , Toyoizumi, H, Kato, M, Naruse, Y, Murata, T, Nishiyama, T. 2001. Measurement of radiocarbon content in leaves from some Japanese sites. Radiocarbon 43(2B):695701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, JH, Hong, W, Park, G, Sung, KS, Lee, KH, Kim, YE, Kim, JK, Choi, HW, Kim, GD, Woo, HJ, Nakanishi, T. 2013. A comparison of distribution maps of Δ14C in 2010 and 2011 in Korea. Radiocarbon 55(2–3):841–7.Google Scholar
Pataki, DE, Randerson, JT, Wang, W, Herzenach, MK, Grulke, NE. 2010. The carbon isotope composition of plants and soils as biomarkers of pollution. In: West, JB, Bowen, GJ, Dawson, TE, Tu, KP, editors. Isoscapes: Understanding Movement, Pattern, and Process on Earth through Isotope Mapping. Dordrecht: Springer. p 407–23.Google Scholar
Pawełczyk, S, Pazdur, A. 2004. Carbon isotopic composition of tree rings as a tool for biomonitoring CO2 level. Radiocarbon 46(2):701–19.Google Scholar
Pazdur, A, Nakamura, T, Pawełczyk, S, Pawlyta, J, Piotrowska, N, Rakowski, A, Sensuła, B, Szczepanek, M. 2007. Carbon isotopes in tree rings: climate and the Suess effect interferences in the last 400 years. Radiocarbon 49(2):775–88.Google Scholar
Pazdur, A, Kuc, T, Pawełczyk, S, Piotrowska, N, Sensuła, B, Różański, K. 2013. Carbon isotope composition of atmospheric carbon dioxide in southern Poland: imprint of anthropogenic CO2 emissions in regional biosphere. Radiocarbon 55(2–3):848–64.Google Scholar
Rakowski, AZ, Nakamura, T, Pazdur, A, Measdows, J. 2013. Radiocarbon concentration in annual tree rings from the Salamanca region, western Spain. Radiocarbon 55(2–3):1533–40.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M, Polach, HA. 1977. Discussion: reporting of 14C data. Radiocarbon 19(3):355–63.Google Scholar
Svetlik, I, Povinec, PP, Molnar, M, Meinhardt, F, Michalek, V, Simon, J, Svingor, E. 2010. Estimation of long-term trends in the tropospheric 14CO2 activity concentration. Radiocarbon 52(2–3):815–22.Google Scholar
Tans, PP, De Jong, AFM, Mook, WG. 1979. Natural atmospheric 14C variation and the Suess effect. Nature 280(5725):826–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar