Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-k7p5g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T13:48:06.599Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

AMS 14C Dating of Human Bones Using Sequential Pyrolysis and Combustion of Collagen

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Hong Wang
Affiliation:
Illinois State Geological Survey, Institute of Natural Resource Sustainability, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois 61820, USA.
Stanley H Ambrose
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, USA.
Kristin M Hedman
Affiliation:
Illinois State Archeological Survey, Institute of Natural Resource Sustainability, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois 61820, USA.
Thomas E Emerson
Affiliation:
Illinois State Archeological Survey, Institute of Natural Resource Sustainability, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois 61820, USA.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The Radiocarbon Dating Laboratory at the University of Illinois has been using the pyrolysis-combustion technique to separate pyrolysis-volatile (Py-V) or low molecular weight and pyrolysis-residue (Py-R) or high molecular weight compounds for 14C dating of organic remains since 2003. We have applied this method to human collagen dating to examine the 14C age difference between low and high molecular weight organic compounds. Results show that both fractions of late prehistoric period human bones from Illinois archaeological sites yield identical 14C dates but that Py-V or low molecular weight fractions of Archaic period human bones appear to be slightly contaminated. In this case, Py-V components or low molecular weight collagen fraction yield older 14C dates, which could result from contamination from old organic-rich sediments. The pyrolysis-combustion technique provides an economical alternative method to date bones that have not been satisfactorily dated using conventional purification techniques.

Type
Methods, Applications, and Developments
Copyright
Copyright © 2010 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

References

Ambrose, SH. 1990. Preparation and characterization of bone and tooth collagen for isotopic analysis. Journal of Archaeological Science 17(4):431–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ambrose, SH, Norr, L. 1993. Isotopic composition of dietary protein and energy versus bone collagen and apatite: purified diet growth experiments. In: Lambert, J, Grupe, G, editors. Molecular Archaeology of Prehistoric Human Bone. Berlin: Springer. p 137.Google Scholar
Ambrose, SH. 1993. Isotopic analysis: methodological and interpretive considerations. In: Sandford, MK, editor. Investigations of Ancient Human Tissue: Chemical Analyses in Anthropology. New York: Gordon and Breach Scientific. p 59130.Google Scholar
Bluhm, E, O'Brien, P, Wenner, DJ. 1990. Hoxie Farm and Huber: two Upper Mississippian archaeological sites in Cook County, Illinois. In: Brown, JA, O'Brien, P, editors. At the Edge of Prehistory: Huber Phase Archaeology in the Chicago Area. Kampsville: Center for American Archaeology. p 1190.Google Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C, Higham, TFG, Bowles, A, Hedges, REM. 2004. Improvements to the pretreatment of bone at Oxford. Radiocarbon 46(1):155–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, TA, Nelson, DE, Vogel, JS, Southon, JR. 1988. Improved collagen extraction by modified Longin method. Radiocarbon 30(2):171–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, MJ, Nielsen-Marsh, CM, Hiller, J, Smith, CI, Roberts, JP, Prigodich, RV, Wess, TJ, Csapò, J, Millard, AR, Turner-Walker, G. 2002. The survival of organic matter in bone: a review. Archaeometry 44(3):383–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeNiro, MJ, Weiner, S. 1988. Use of collagenase to purify collagen from prehistoric bones for stable isotopic analysis. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 52(10):2425–31.Google Scholar
Dobberstein, RC, Collins, MJ, Craig, OE, Taylor, G, Penkman, KEH, Ritz-Timme, S. 2009. Archaeological collagen: Why worry about collagen diagenesis? Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences 1(1):3142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, BM, Pearsall, D, Boellstorff, J. 1980. Post-Sangamon record of volcanism and climatic change at Natural Trap Cave, Wyoming. In: Abstracts and Program, 6th Biennial Meeting, American Quaternary Association. p 26.Google Scholar
Hedges, REM, Law, IA, Bronk Ramsey, C, Housley, RA. 1989. The Oxford accelerator mass spectrometry facility: technical developments in routine dating. Archaeometry 31(2):99113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higham, TFG, Jacobi, RM, Bronk Ramsey, C. 2006. AMS radiocarbon dating of ancient bone using ultrafiltration. Radiocarbon 48(2):179–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longin, R. 1971. New method of collagen extraction for radiocarbon dating. Nature 230(5292):241–2.Google Scholar
Minami, M, Muto, H, Nakamura, T. 2004. Chemical techniques to extract organic fractions from fossil bones for accurate 14C dating. Nuclear Instrumental Methods in Physics Research B 223–224:302–7.Google Scholar
Nelson, DE. 1991. A new method for carbon isotopic analysis of protein. Science 251(4993):552–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nolan, DJ, Fishel, L. 2009. Archaic cultural variation and lifeways in west-central Illinois. In: Emerson, TE, McElrath, DL, Fortier, AC, editors. Archaic Societies: Diversity and Complexity Across the Midcontinent. Albany: State University of New York Press. p 401–90.Google Scholar
Southon, JR. 2007. Graphite reactor memory—where is it from and how to minimize it? Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 259(1):288–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stafford, TW Jr, Jull, AJT, Brendel, K, Duhamel, RC, Donahue, DJ. 1987. Study of bone radiocarbon dating accuracy at the University of Arizona NSF accelerator facility for radioisotope analysis. Radiocarbon 29(1):2444.Google Scholar
Stafford, TW, Brendel, K, Duhamel, RC. 1988. Radiocarbon, 13C, and 15N analysis of fossil bone: removal of humates with XAD-2 resin. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 52(8):2257–67.Google Scholar
Stafford, TW, Hare, PE, Currie, L, Jull, AJT, Donahue, DJ. 1991. Accelerator radiocarbon dating at the molecular level. Journal of Archaeological Science 18(1):3572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tisnerat-Laborde, N, Valladas, H, Kaltnecker, E, Arnold, M. 2003. AMS radiocarbon dating of bones at LSCE. Radiocarbon 45(3):409–19.Google Scholar
Tripp, JA, McCullagh, JSO, Hedges, REM. 2006. Preparative separation of underivatized amino acids for compound-specific stable isotope analysis and radiocarbon dating of hydrolyzed bone collage. Journal of Separation Science 29(1):41–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Klinken, G. 1999. Bone quality indicators for paleodietary and radiocarbon measurements. Journal of Archaeological Science 26(6):687–95.Google Scholar
van Klinken, GJ, Hedges, REM. 1995. Experiments on collagen-humic interactions: speed of humic uptake, and effects of diverse chemical treatments. Journal of Archaeological Science 22(2):263–70.Google Scholar
van Klinken, GJ, Mook, WG. 1990. Preparative high-performance liquid chromatographic separation of individual amino acids derived from fossil bone. Radiocarbon 32(2):155–64.Google Scholar
van Klinken, GJ, Bowles, AD, Hedges, REM. 1994. Radiocarbon dating of peptides isolated from contaminated fossil bone collagen by collagenase digestion by re-versed-phase chromatography. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 58(11):2543–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, H, Hackley, KC, Panno, SV, Coleman, DD, Liu, JCL, Brown, J. 2003. Pyrolysis-combustion 14C dating of soil organic matter. Quaternary Research 60(3):348–55.Google Scholar
Wang, X, Martin, LD. 1993. Natural Trap Cave. National Geographic Research and Exploration 9:422–35.Google Scholar