Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-k7p5g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T21:25:07.624Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Chemical Isotope Dilution for 14C Ams and the Potential for GC/AMS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Richard Gillespie
Richard Gillespie*
Affiliation:
Archaeology Department, Simon Eraser University, Burnaby British Columbia, Canada
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The advent of accelerator-based mass spectrometry (AMS) radiocarbon dating has reduced the minimum sample size required to ca 1 mg from the 1 g of traditional beta counting techniques (cf Wölfli, Polach & Andersen, 1984). However, it is clear that even smaller samples will be necessary for some fields of endeavor, particularly environmental work where the absolute quantities are small, perhaps of the order of a few micrograms (Currie et al, 1985). This raises serious problems in the handling and measurement of such small amounts, so that dilution will sometimes be required. Normally, sample dilution is accomplished by adding “dead” CO2 to the combusted sample CO2, which requires very careful measurement of two gas pressures for the calculation of a dilution ratio. By forming a chemical derivative of a sample before combustion, gas pressure measurement is not necessary and an exact dilution ratio can be selected by judicous choice of the dilution reagent. This paper demonstrates that such a technique is possible for the AMS 14C dating of derivatized amino acids.

Type
Research Article
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 28 , Issue 3 , 1986 , pp. 1065 - 1067
Copyright
Copyright © The American Journal of Science 

References

Currie, L A, Klouda, G A, Elmore, D and Gove, H E, 1985, Radiocarbon dating of microgram samples: accelerator mass spectrometry and electromagnetic isotope separation: Nuclear Instruments & Methods v B12, p 396–401.Google Scholar
Gillespie, R, Hedges, R E M and Wand, J O, 1984, AMS radiocarbon dating of bone: Jour Archaeol Sci, v 11, p 165–168.Google Scholar
Middleton, R, 1984, A review of ion sources for accelerator mass spectrometry, in Wölfli, W, Polach, H A and Andersen, H H, eds, Internatl conf on AMS, 3rd, Proc: Nuclear Instruments & Methods, v B5, p 193–199.Google Scholar
Nelson, D E, Southon, J R, Vogel, J S, Korteling, R G and Ku, T L, 1984, Progress in radioisotope dating; the SFU group, in Wölfli, W, Polach, H A and Andersen, H H, eds, Internatl conf on AMS, 3rd, Proc: Nuclear Instruments & Methods, v B5, p 139–143.Google Scholar
Okuyama, T and Satake, K, 1960, On the preparation and properties of 2,4,6-trinitrophenylamino acids and -peptides: Jour Biochem, v 47, p 454–465.Google Scholar
Vogel, J S, Southon, J R, Nelson, D E and Brown, T A, 1984, Performance of catalytically condensed carbon for use in accelerator mass spectrometry, in Wölfli, W, Polach, H A, and Andersen, H H, eds, Internatl conf on AMS, 3rd, Proc: Nuclear Instruments & Methods, v B5, p 289–293.Google Scholar
Wölfli, W, Polach, H A, and Andersen, H H, eds, 1984, Internatl conf on accelerator mass spectrometry, 3rd, Proc: Nuclear Instruments & Methods, v B5.Google Scholar