Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vsgnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T05:07:56.443Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

New Radiocarbon Dates of the North Asian Steppe Zone and its Consequences for the Chronology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Jochen Görsdorf*
Affiliation:
German Institute of Archaeology, Eurasian-Department, P.O. Box 33 00 14, D–14191 Berlin, Germany
Hermann Parzinger
Affiliation:
German Institute of Archaeology, Eurasian-Department, P.O. Box 33 00 14, D–14191 Berlin, Germany
Anatoli Nagler
Affiliation:
German Institute of Archaeology, Eurasian-Department, P.O. Box 33 00 14, D–14191 Berlin, Germany
*
Corresponding author. Email: 14C@dainst.de
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The chronological problems of the Steppe zone have been under intensive investigation during the last years but no generally accepted chronological system existed up to now. We present new radiocarbon dates of samples from several excavation sites. The dates allow a comparison of the Bronze Age development in the Siberian Steppe Zone with other neighboring regions.

Type
II. Our ‘Wet’ Environment
Copyright
Copyright © 2001 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

References

Görsdorf, J. 1990. Die Interpretation von 14-Datierungen im Berliner 14C-Labor. Zeitschrift für Archäologie 24:2734.Google Scholar
Görsdorf, J, Bojadžiev, J. 1996. Zur absoluten chronologie der bulgarischen Urgeschichte. Berliner 14-Datierungen von bulgarischen archäologischen Fundplätzen. Eurasia Antiqua 2:105–73.Google Scholar
Görsdorf, J. 2000. Datierungen im Berliner 14C-labor. Berliner Beiträge zur Archäometrie 17: 121–31.Google Scholar
Görsdorf, J, Parzinger, H, Nagler, A, Leont'ev, N. 1998. New radiocarbon dates from the Siberian Steppe Zone and ist consequences for the regional Bronze Age chronology. Actes du colloque “C14 Archéologie” 1998, Supplément 1999 de la Revue d'Archéométrie: 305–9.Google Scholar
Görsdorf, J, Parzinger, H, Nagler, A, Leont'ev, N. 1998. Neue 14C-Datierungen für die Sibirische Steppe und ihre Konsequenzen für die regionale Bronzezeitchronologie. Eurasia Antiqua 4:7380.Google Scholar
Leont'ev, N, Parzinger, H, Nagler, A. 1996. Die russischdeutschen Ausgrabungen beim Berg Suchanicha am mittleren Enisej. Eurasia Antiqua 2:175204.Google Scholar
Lin, Yün. 1986. A reexamination of the relationship between bronzes of the Shang culture and of the Northern Zone. In: Chang, KC, editor. Studies of Shang archaeology. London, New Haven.Google Scholar
Longin, R. 1970. Extraction du collagéne des os fossiles pour leur datation par la méthode du carbonne 14 [Thesis]. University of Lyon.Google Scholar
Mook, WG, Streurman, HJ. 1983. Physical and chemical aspects of radiocarbon dating. Journal of the European Study Group on Physical, Chemical and Mathematical Techniques Applied to Archaeology. PACT 8:3155.Google Scholar
Olsson, IU, El-Daoushy, MFAF, Abd-El-Mageed, AI, Klasson, M. 1974. A comparison of different methods for pretreatment of bones. Geol. Fören. Stockh. Förhandl. 96:171–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsey, CB. 1995. Radiocarbon calibration and analysis of stratigraphy: the OxCal program. Radiocarbon 37(2):425–30.Google Scholar
Ramsey, CB. 2000. Internet version of the OxCal Program v.3.4. Google Scholar
Semencov, A.A., Romanova, EN, Doluchanov, PM. 1969. Radiouglerodnye daty laboratorii LOIA. SA, H. 1: 251–61.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M, Reimer, PJ, Bard, E, Beck, JW, Burr, GS, Hughen, KA, Kromer, B, McCormac, FG, van der Plicht, J, Spurk, M. 1998. INTCAL98 radiocarbon age calibration, 24,000–0 cal BP. Radiocarbon 40(3): 1041–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vadeckaja, EB 1986. Archeologièeskie pamjatniki v stepjach Srednego Eniseja. Leningrad.Google Scholar