Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-ckgrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-07T09:21:28.862Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Radiocarbon and Archaeology in Japan and Korea: What has Changed Because of the Yayoi Dating Controversy?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Shin'ya Shoda
Shin'ya Shoda*
Affiliation:
National Research Institute for Cultural Properties, Nara 94-1 Kinomoto, Kashihara, Nara 634-0025, Japan. Email: shoda@nabunken.go.jp
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Since the sensational 2003 announcement that pushed the start of the Yayoi period back by 500 yr, archaeologists working on 1st millennium BC material from northeast Asia have had to switch from the older short chronology to a new long chronology. However, this change need not apply to the entire northeast Asian region as China's chronology is tied to written records. The timeline of the Korean peninsula, intermediate between the Chinese and Japanese ones, needs to be reexamined. The chronology of the 1st millennium BC in the Korean peninsula is still in dispute, in part because many of the radiocarbon dates lack clear archaeological contexts. This paper shows that a reliable typological relationship observed in archaeological materials existed at this time linking northeast Asia from China to Japan. This paper includes absolute dates based on the initial AMS 14C measurements of charred crops from South Korean sites.

Type
Archaeology
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 52 , Issue 2: 20th Int. Radiocarbon Conference Proceedings , 2010 , pp. 421 - 427
Copyright
Copyright © 2010 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

References

Bae, JS. 2007. Formation of Mumun Pottery Culture and Social Classification. Seoul: Seogyong. 263 p. In Korean.Google Scholar
Baek, HK, Ji, HB, Park, YK. 2002. Dwelling Sites in Gyodong, Kangnung. Kangnung: Museum of Kangnung National University. 200 p. In Korean.Google Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. 1995. Radiocarbon calibration and analysis of stratigraphy: the OxCal program. Radiocarbon 37(2):425–30.Google Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. 2001. Development of the radiocarbon calibration program. Radiocarbon 43(2A):355–63.Google Scholar
Crawford, G, Lee, GA. 2003. Agricultural origin in the Korean peninsula. Antiquity 77(295):87–95.Google Scholar
Fujio, S. 2007. The beginning date of Yayoi period. In: Nishimoto, T, editor. From Jomon Period to Yayoi Period. Tokyo: Yuzankaku. p 7–19. In Japanese.Google Scholar
Fujio, S, Imamura, M. 2009. Environmental change in the beginning of Yayoi period based on the carbon-14 record. In: Shitara, H, Fujio, S, Matsugi, T, editors. Archaeology of Yayoi Period 2. Tokyo: Douseisha. p 172–87. In Japanese.Google Scholar
Fukasawa, Y, Shoda, S. 2009. Seon Songgukri /Songukri type pottery and Yusu Itazuke type pottery. In: Shitara, H, Fujio, S, Matsugi, T, editors. Archaeology of Yayoi Period 2. Tokyo: Douseisha. p 172–87. In Japanese.Google Scholar
Harunari, H, Fujio, S, Imamura, M, Sakamoto, M. 2003. Yayoi Jidai no Kasishi Nendai (The beginning date of the Yayoi period). Abstracts for the 69th Annual Meeting of the Japanese Archaeological Association. p 65–8. In Japanese.Google Scholar
Hashiguchi, T. 1984. Iron tools. Ishizaki Magarita Site II. p 423. Fukuoka: Education Board of Fukuoka Prefecture. In Japanese.Google Scholar
Kim, JS. 2001. Rethinking Hunamri assemblage. Yeonnam Kokohak 28. In Korean.Google Scholar
Korean Institute for Archaeology and Environment. 2008. Information Packet for On-site Explanatory Meeting on the Excavation of the Site for MACCA. In Korean.Google Scholar
Lee, BK. 1974. Mumun pottery and polished stool tools in Geyongi-do. Archaeology 3:53–130. In Korean.Google Scholar
Lee, HW. 2009. Settlement Structure and Social Organization in the Bronze Age. Seoul: Seogyong. 292 p. In Korean.Google Scholar
Lee, SK. 1999. Outline of the excavation on Jinju Daepyong Eoeun loc.1 site. Seminar on the Prehistoric Remains of the Nam River. Busan: Dong-a University Museum. p 103–10. In Korean.Google Scholar
Miyaji, S. 2009. Typological reconsideration of pottery samples for radiocarbon dating at the beginning of Yayoi period. Quarterly of Archaeological Studies 55(4):35–54. In Japanese.Google Scholar
Mizunoe, K. 2009. Reexamination of Kurokawa type pottery. In: Nishimoto, T, editor. The Beginning of Yayoi Agriculture and Its Dating. Tokyo: Yuzankaku. p 114–27. In Japanese.Google Scholar
Na, GJ. 2006. Report on the Excavation of Jagae-ri Site (I), Dangjin. Gongju: Chungcheong Cultural Properties Research Institute. In Korean.Google Scholar
Nishimoto, T. 2007. From Jomon culture to Yayoi culture. In: Nishimoto, T, editor. From Jomon Period to Yayoi Period. Tokyo: Yuzankaku. p 3–6. In Japanese.Google Scholar
Nojima, H. 2008. Studies of the Introduction and Circulation of Early Iron in Yayoi Period. Hiroshima: Hiroshima University. 128 p. In Japanese.Google Scholar
Onuki, S. 2003. Orthodoxy and heresy. In: Kokogaku Kenkyukai Tokyo Branch 4th Meeting Abstracts. Tokyo. p 37–46. In Japanese.Google Scholar
Otomasu, S. 1981. Saitoyama site. In: The Japan Archaeologists Association, editor. The Origin and Growth of Farming Community in Japan. Tokyo: Tokyodo. p 5–131. In Japanese.Google Scholar
Park, SB. 1993. Bronze and Iron culture in the Han River Basin. In: The History of Han River Basin. Seoul: Mineunsa. p 115–223. In Korean.Google Scholar
Park, SB. 1999. Investigation on formation of Hunam-Ri Assemblage. Journal of the Hoseo Archaeological Society 1:79–93. In Korean.Google Scholar
Reimer, PJ, Baillie, MGL, Bard, E, Bayliss, A, Beck, JW, Bertrand, CJH, Blackwell, PG, Buck, CE, Burr, GS, Cutler, KB, Damon, PE, Edwards, RL, Fairbanks, RG, Friedrich, M, Guilderson, TP, Hogg, AG, Hughen, KA, Kromer, B, McCormac, G, Manning, S, Bronk Ramsey, C, Reimer, RW, Remmele, S, Southon, JR, Stuiver, M, Talamo, S, Taylor, FW, van der Plicht, J, Weyhenmeyer, CE. 2004. IntCal04 terrestrial radiocarbon age calibration, 0–26 cal kyr BP. Radiocarbon 46(3):1029–58.Google Scholar
Renfrew, C. 1973. Before Civilization. London: Jonathan Cape. 320 p.Google Scholar
Sahara, M. 1975. Beginning of agriculture and formation of class society. In: Japanese History 1. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten. p 113–82. In Japanese.Google Scholar
Sahara, M. 1981. Natural scientists as seen by an archaeologist. In: Mabuchi, H, Tominaga, T, editors. 10 Chapters on Chemistry for Archaeology. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press. p 1–24. In Japanese.Google Scholar
Sakurai, H, Kato, W, Takahashi, Y, Suzuki, K, Takahashi, Y, Gunji, S, Tokanai, F. 2006. 14C dating of ∼2500-yr-old Choukai Jindai cedar tree rings from Japan using highly accurate LSC measurement. Radiocarbon 48(3):401–8.Google Scholar
Shoda, S. 2006 A bronze dagger from Birae-dong and the dating of the Yayoi period (II). Kodai 119:123–58. In Japanese.Google Scholar
Shoda, S. 2007. A comment on the Yayoi period dating controversy. Bulletin of the Society for East Asian Archaeology 1:1–7.Google Scholar
Shoda, S. 2009a. Production and Society in the Southern Korean Bronze Age. Seoul: Hakyoun Cultural Publishing. 304 p. In Korean.Google Scholar
Shoda, S. 2009b. A chronological study of Korean Bronze Age. Journal of the Archaeological Society of Nippon 93(1):1–31.Google Scholar
Xia-Shang-Zhou Dating Project Group. 2000. Report of Xia-Shang-Zhou Dating Project, 1996–2000. Beijing: Shijie Tushu Publishing. 118 p. In Chinese.Google Scholar