Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-07T02:17:14.330Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Radiocarbon level in the Atmosphere of Ramnicu Valcea, Romania

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 November 2019

I Faurescu Open the ORCID record for I Faurescu [Opens in a new window] ,
C Varlam ,
I Vagner ,
D Faurescu ,
D Bogdan  and
D Costinel
I Faurescu*
Affiliation:
National Institute for Cryogenics and Isotopic Technologies – ICSI Rm.Valcea, Romania
C Varlam
Affiliation:
National Institute for Cryogenics and Isotopic Technologies – ICSI Rm.Valcea, Romania
I Vagner
Affiliation:
National Institute for Cryogenics and Isotopic Technologies – ICSI Rm.Valcea, Romania
D Faurescu
Affiliation:
National Institute for Cryogenics and Isotopic Technologies – ICSI Rm.Valcea, Romania
D Bogdan
Affiliation:
National Institute for Cryogenics and Isotopic Technologies – ICSI Rm.Valcea, Romania
D Costinel
Affiliation:
National Institute for Cryogenics and Isotopic Technologies – ICSI Rm.Valcea, Romania
*
*Corresponding author. Email: ionut.faurescu@icsi.ro.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper presents radiocarbon (14C) variations in the atmosphere from Ramnicu Valcea, Romania. The samples were collected in the vicinity of the Experimental Pilot Plant for Tritium and Deuterium Separation (PESTD) from the Institute of the Cryogenics and Isotopic Technologies (ICSI) placed about 10 km south from the Ramnicu Valcea city (Romania), in the Govora industrial area. This facility is an experimental project in the national nuclear energy research program, which has the aim of developing technologies for tritium separation from heavy water. It should be noted that in the Govora industrial area operates a 315 MW coal-fired thermoelectric power plant and two chemical plants. In order to determine radiocarbon activity in the atmosphere, samples were collected monthly by absorption of CO2 into sodium hydroxide (NaOH) at Ramnicu Valcea. In addition, control materials (tree leaves, wild vegetation, and grapes), known activity standards, and process blanks (marble) were analyzed. Radiocarbon measurements were performed using the direct absorption method and liquid scintillation counting. The measured Δ14C levels varied between –57‰ and 61‰. The results have a decreasing trend, but due to local influence caused by the continuous production of fossil CO2, we cannot observe Δ14C seasonal variations.

Keywords

atmosphereLSCradiocarbon
Type
Conference Paper
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 61 , Issue 6: Radiocarbon 2018 Conference Proceedings Trondheim, Norway, June 17–22, 2018 Part 2 of 2 , December 2019 , pp. 1625 - 1632
Copyright
© 2019 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Selected Papers from the 23rd International Radiocarbon Conference, Trondheim, Norway, 17–22 June, 2018

References

REFERENCES

Baydoun, R, El Samad, O, Nsouli, B, Younes, G. 2015. Seasonal variations of radiocarbon content in plant leaves in a 14C-depleted area. Radiocarbon 57(3):389–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronic, IK, Horvatincic, N, Baresic, J, Obelic, B. 2009. Measurement of 14C activity by liquid scintillation counting. Applied Radiation and Isotopes 67:800–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammer, Samuel; Levin, Ingeborg. 2017. Monthly mean atmospheric Δ14CO2 at Jungfraujoch and Schauinsland from 1986 to 2016. https://doi.org/10.11588/data/10100, heiDATA, V2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Atomic Energy Agency [IAEA]. 2004. Management of waste containing tritium and carbon-14. Technical reports, no. 421. Vienna: IAEA. pp 5–37. Available online at http://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/TRS421_web.pdf.Google Scholar
Ješkovský, M, Povinec, PP, Steier, P, Šivo, A, Richtáriková, M. 2015. Retrospective study of 14C concentration in the vicinity of NPP Jaslovské Bohunice using tree rings and the AMS technique. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 361:129–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kianpour, M, Sobati, MA, Shahhosseini, S. 2012. Experimental and modeling of CO2 capture by dry sodium hydroxide carbonation. Chemical Engineering Research and Design 90(11):2041–2050 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leaney, F, Herczeg, A, Dighton, J. 1994. New developments for the direct CO2 absorption method for radiocarbon analysis. Quaternary Science Reviews 13(2):171–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levin, I, Hesshaimer, V. 2000. Radiocarbon—a unique tracer of global carbon cycle dynamics. Radiocarbon 42(1):69–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levin, I, Kromer, B. 1997. Twenty years of atmospheric 14CO2 observations at Schauinsland Station, Germany. Radiocarbon 39(2):205–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levin, I, Kromer, B. 2004. The tropospheric 14CO2 level in mid-latitudes of the Northern Hemisphere (1959–2003). Radiocarbon 46(3):1261–1272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levin, I, Naegler, T, Kromer, B, Diehl, M, Francey, RJ, Gomez-Pelaez, AJ, Steele, LP, Wagenbach, D, Weller, R, Worthy, DE. 2010. Observations and modeling of the global distribution and long-term trend of atmospheric 14CO2. Tellus B 62(1):26–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levin, I, Kromer, B, Hammer, S. 2013. Atmospheric Δ14CO2 trend in Western European background air from 2000 to 2012. Tellus B: Chemical and Physical Meteorology 65(1). doi: 10.3402/tellusb.v65i0.20092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moghissi, AA, Bretthauer, EW, Whittaker, EL, McNelis, DN. 1975. Oxygen bomb combustion of environmental and biological samples for tritium analysis. The International Journal of Applied Radiation and Isotopes 26(6–7):339–342.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Major, I, Haszpra, L, Rinyu, L, Futo, I, Bihari, A, Hammer, S, Jull, T, Molnar, M. 2018. Temporal variation of atmospheric fossil and modern CO2 excess at a Central European rural tower station between 2008 and 2014. Radiocarbon 60(5):1285–1299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molnar, M, Haszpra, L, Svingor, E, Major, I, Svetlik, I. 2010. Atmospheric fossil fuel CO2 measurement using a field unit in a central European city during the winter of 2008/09. Radiocarbon 52(2–3):835–845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peng, Y, Zhao, B, Li, L. 2012. Advance in post-combustion CO2 capture with alkaline solution: A brief review. Energy Procedia 14:1515–1522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Povinec, PP, Chudy, M, Sivo, A. 1986. Anthropogenic radiocarbon: Past, present, and future. Radiocarbon 28(2A):668–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Povinec, PP, Sivo, A, Simon, J, Holy, K, Chudy, M, Richtáriková, M, Morávek, J. 2008. Impact of the Bohunice Nuclear Power Plant on atmospheric radiocarbon. Applied Radiation and Isotopes 66(11):1686–1690.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Povinec, PP, Chudy, M, Sivo, A, Simon, J, Holy, K, Richtáriková, M. 2009. Forty years of atmospheric radiocarbon monitoring around Bohunice nuclear power plant, Slovakia. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 100(2):125–130.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Randerson, JT, Enting, IG, Schuur, EAG, Caldeira, K, Fung, IY. 2002. Seasonal and latitudinal variability of troposphere Δ14CO2: Post bomb contributions from fossil fuels, oceans, the stratosphere, and the terrestrial biosphere. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 16(4):1112. doi: 10.1029/2002GB001876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roussel-Debet, S, Gontier, G, Siclet, F, Fournier, M. 2006. Distribution of carbon-14 in the terrestrial environment close to French nuclear power plants. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 87(3):246–259.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stuiver, M, Polach, H. 1977. Discussion: reporting of 14C data. Radiocarbon 19(3):355–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suess, HE. 1955. Radiocarbon concentration in modern wood. Science 122(3166):415–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varlam, C, Stefanescu, I, Varlam, M, Faurescu, I, Popescu, I. 2006. Optimization of 14C concentration measurement in aqueous samples using the direct absorption method and LSC. In: Chalupnik, S, Schoenhofer, F, Noakes, J, editors. LSC 2005: Advances in liquid scintillation spectrometry. Tucson (AZ): Radiocarbon. p. 423–428.Google Scholar
Xu, S, Cook, GT, Cresswell, AJ, Dunbar, E, Freeman, S, Hastie, H, Hou, X, Jacobsson, P, Naysmith, P, Sanderson, D. 2015. Radiocarbon concentration in modern tree rings from Fukushima, Japan. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 146:67–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed