Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-xq9c7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-07T08:45:00.718Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Development of an approach to assess critical doses and dose rates for cultivated plants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 January 2012

J. Barescut ,
D. Lariviere ,
T. Stocki ,
A.A. Oudalova ,
L.N. Ulyanenko  and
S.A. Geras’kin
A.A. Oudalova
Affiliation:
Russian Institute of Agricultural Radiology and Agroecology, 249032 Obninsk, Russia
L.N. Ulyanenko
Affiliation:
Russian Institute of Agricultural Radiology and Agroecology, 249032 Obninsk, Russia
S.A. Geras’kin
Affiliation:
Russian Institute of Agricultural Radiology and Agroecology, 249032 Obninsk, Russia
Get access

Abstract

The aim of this work is to develop methods for an assessment of critical doses and dose rates that can result in significant radiation-induced effects in agrocenoses. This is realized on an example of cultivated plants which are one of the main components of agroecosystems. Available information on dose dependences in such umbrella endpoints as reproduction, survival, morbidity, alterations in morphological and biochemical processes, genetic effects in crops, vegetables, fruit trees, etc are gathered from papers issued mainly in Russian scientific press during last 50 years. Data are maintained as database in MS Access that contains about 10000 records at the moment. As critical exposure values, doses are considered producing 50% changes of biological effect at acute impact (ED50), or dose rates resulting in 10% changes at chronic exposure of plants (EDR10). The critical doses and dose rates for agrocenosis estimated from available information on reproduction and survival are presented here. Primary data are assesed for their quality according to several criteria. Three models (linear, logariphmic, logistic) for dose-effect relationship are tested for an applicability to fit a dose-effect dependence taking account of their goodness-of-fit and robustness of ED50 and EDR10 estimates.

Type
Research Article
Information
Radioprotection , Volume 46 , Issue 6: ICRER 2011 – International Conference on Radioecology & Environmental Radioactivity: Environment & Nuclear Renaissance , 2011 , pp. S249 - S254
Copyright
© Owned by the authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ICRP Publication 91. A framework for assessing the impact of ionising radiation on non-human species (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 2003).
ICRP Publication 108. Environmental protection: the concept and use of reference animals and plants (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 2009).
Agricultural radioecology, edited by Alexakhin R.M., Korneev N.A. (Ecology, Moscow, 1991).
ICRP Publication 103. 2007 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 2007).
Garnier-Laplace J., Della-Vedova C., Gilbin R., et al., Environ. Sci.Technol. 40 (2006) 6498-6505.
Garnier-Laplace J., Copplestone D., Gilbin R., et al., J. Environ. Radioact. 99 (2008) 1474-1483.
Siemer E.G., Constantin M.J., Killion D.D., In Survival of Food Crops and Livestock in the Event of Nuclear War. Edited by D.W. Bensen, A.H. Sparrow (U.S. Atomic Energy Comission Office of Information Service, N.Y., 1971) pp. 287-305.
Zolotova A.A. and Shcherbakov V.K., Radiobiology. 27 (1987) 62-68 (in Russian).
Oudalova A.A., Ulyanenko L.N., Alexakhin R.M., et al., Radiat.Biol.Radioecol. 50 (2010) 572-581(in Russian).
Oudalova A., Ulyanenko L., Geras’kin S., Filipas A., Assessment of critical doses for reproduction and survival of cultivated plants. In Proceedings of the Third European IRPA Congress, Helsinki, Finland, 14-18 June 2010 (http://www.irpa2010europe.com/ proceedings/P09.htm)
Effects on non-human biota. Annex C to UNSCEAR 2008 Report to the General Assembly (United Nations, New York, 2008)
Geras’kin S.A., Fesenko S.V., Alexakhin R.M. Environ. Intern. 80 (2008) 59-74.
Copplestone D., Hingston J., Real A., J. Environ. Radioact. 99 (2008) 1456-1463.
Andersson P., Garnier-Laplace J., Beresford N., et al., J. Environ. Radioact. 100 (2009) 1100-1108.