No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
ERASING THE AETHIOPIAN IN CICERO'S POST REDITUM IN SENATU
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 January 2023
Extract
The Roman attitude toward the Ethiopian as expressed in scattered passages is far less kindly than the Greek. The usage in Terence and the Auctor ad Herennium which imply a vogue for Ethiopians is probably in imitation of Greek usage. How early the Roman attitude crystalized into racial feeling it is hard to say, and as those who express it are chiefly satirists one must be careful in drawing conclusions. Nevertheless in the absence of an expressed good will and in the face of references which have a superior or contemptuous tone it is evident that the Romans had no special affection for Ethiopians at Rome, however romantically they may have spoken of the races of distant India. The earliest passage in which they are spoken of slightingly seems to be in Cicero—cum hoc homine an cum stipite Aethiope, Cicero, De Sen., 6. The word does not occur in all the manuscripts and the Oxford and Teubner texts omit it entirely. In notes it is translated ‘blockhead’ and the statement made that in antiquity the Ethiopians were synonymous with stupidity, a conclusion obviously drawn from the passage and the modern attitude toward them. Even if the word was actually used by Cicero, this passage alone is basis for such a theory.
Mrs. Beardsley (op. cit., pp.119–120), in my judgement, is wrong in her conclusion that the Roman attitude toward the Negro crystallized into racial feeling. In support of her view that the Romans referred to the Ethiopians at Rome in a superior and contemptuous tone, Mrs. Beardsley includes the following passages: (1) Cicero, Red. in Sen., 6.14 (cited incorrectly as De Sen., 6); (2) Martial, VI, 39, 6; (3) Juvenal, II, 23. Cicero, Red in Sen., 6.14…cum hoc homine an stipite Aethiope…, as Mrs. Beardsley admits, does not appear in all the manuscripts and is omitted in the best established texts. A consideration of the context leads me to believe that the editors (Oxford, Teubner, Loeb) are right in rejecting Aethiope or stipite Aethiope and in reading stipite. Nevertheless, the appearance of the variant indicates that the author of the reading used Aethiope in a derogatory sense. (It is possible that the pejorative meaning of aethiops was a medieval development.)
In these two excerpts, Grace Hadley Beardsley and Frank M. Snowden, Jr., discuss the appearance of the word Aethiops (‘Aethiopian’) in Cicero's Post reditum in senatu 14. Beardsley, whose intellectual project was motivated, as Maghan Keita and, more recently, Najee Olya have discussed, by racial animus and who sought to find evidence of Greco-Roman anti-Blackness that was both consistent with, and therefore a legitimizing exemplum for, contemporary anti-Blackness in 20th-century America, took Cicero's words as ‘the earliest passage in which [Aethiopians] are spoken of slightingly’ at Rome—doing so cautiously, given the fact that most editors had deleted it from the text. Frank M. Snowden, Jr.—whose own work W.E.B. Du Bois explicitly contrasted with Beardsley—responded to Beardsley's assertion that Post reditum in senatu contained evidence of anti-Blackness with scepticism, ultimately doubting the legitimate textual presence of the term and interpreting its presence instead as an artefact of hostile scribal intervention. Indeed, both Beardsley and Snowden discuss the fact that Aethiope does not occur in all of the Cicero manuscripts. While it is true that none of the authoritative textual editions print Aethiope at Post reditum in senatu 14, the textual apparatus nonetheless demonstrates clearly that the term appears in the manuscript tradition more often than it does not:
stipe P1: etiope P2
stipe uel ethiope G
uel aethiope stipe E1
esope H
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Ramus 2023
References
Bispham, E. (2007), From Asculum to Actium. The Municipalization of Italy from the Social War to Augustus (Oxford).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, A.A. (2000), The Melancholy of Race. Psychoanalysis, Assimilation, and Hidden Grief (Oxford).Google Scholar
Claros, Y. (2021), ‘Biology, Gender, Color, and the Racialization of Politics at Imperial Athens’, paper delivered at the RaceB4Race conference, 7 May (Arizona Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies).Google Scholar
Corbeill, A. (1996), Controlling Laughter. Political Humor in the late Roman Republic (Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
Čulík-Baird, H. (2020), ‘Archias the Good Immigrant’, Rhetorica 38.4, 382–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dee, J. (2003), ‘Black Odysseus, White Caesar: When Did “White People” Become “White”?’, CJ 99.2, 157–67.Google Scholar
Dench, E. (1995), From Barbarians to New Men. Greek, Roman, and Modern Perceptions of Peoples from the Central Apennines (Oxford).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dugan, J. (2001), ‘How to Make (and Break) a Cicero: Epideixis, Textuality, and Self-fashioning in the Pro Archia and In Pisonem’, CA 20.1, 35–77.Google Scholar
Fielder, B.N. (2013), ‘Animal Humanism: Race, Species, and Affective Kinship in Nineteenth-Century Abolitionism’, American Quarterly 65.3, 487–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fields, K.E., and Fields, B.J. (2012), Racecraft. The Soul of Inequality in American Life (London/Brooklyn).Google Scholar
Ford, R.B. (2020), Rome, China, and the Barbarians. Ethnographic Traditions and the Transformation of Empires (Cambridge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goetz, G., and Schöll, F. (1910), M. Terenti Varronis De Linguae Latinae Quae Supersunt (Leipzig).Google Scholar
Gotter, U. (2009), ‘Cato's “Origines”: The historian and his enemies’, in Feldherr, A. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to the Roman Historians (Cambridge), 108–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haley, S.P. (1993), ‘Black Feminist Thought and Classics: Re-membering, Re-claiming, Re-empowering’, in Rabinowitz, N.S. and Richlin, A. (eds), Feminist Theory and the Classics (New York/Oxford), 23–43.Google Scholar
Haley, S.P. (2009), ‘Be Not Afraid of the Dark: Critical Race Theory and Classical Studies’, in Nasrallah, L. and Schüssler Fiorenza, E. (eds), Prejudice and Christian Beginnings: Investigating Race, Gender and Ethnicity in Early Christian Studies (Minneapolis, MN), 27–50.Google Scholar
Haley, S.P. (2021), ‘“Surely in many ways I hold different views from others”: racialized gender in ancient Hellenic and Roman societies’, paper delivered at The Seventh Annual Adam Parry and Anne Amory Parry Lecture, 25 March (Yale University).Google Scholar
Isaac, B. (2004), The Invention of Racism in Classical Antiquity (Princeton, NJ).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, M. (2016), Ovid on Cosmetics. Medicamina Faciei Femineae and Related Texts (New York).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, R.F. (2016), ‘Airs, Waters, Metals, Earth. People and Environment in Archaic and Classical Greek Thought’, in Kennedy, R.F. and Jones-Lewis, M. (eds), The Routledge Handbook of Identity and the Environment in the Classical and Medieval Worlds (Oxford/New York), 9–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Köster, I.K (2014), ‘Feasting Centaurs and Destructive Consuls in Cicero's In Pisonem’, ICS 39, 63–79.Google Scholar
Lenaghan, J.O. (1969), A Commentary on Cicero's Oration De Haruspicum Responso (The Hague).Google Scholar
Maslowski, T. (1981), Orationes Cum Senatui gratius egit, Cum populo gratius egit, De domo sua, De haruspicum responsis (Leipzig).Google Scholar
Olya, N. (2021), ‘Exiting Frank M. Snowden, Jr.'s Anthropological Gallery: Toward an Understanding of Visual Representations of Africans in Ancient Greek Vase-Painting’, paper delivered, 22 October (University of Virginia).Google Scholar
Olya, N. (2022), ‘On the (In)visibility of Aithiopians: Interrogating the Presentation of Greek Images of Black Africans in Museums and Their Absence in Greek Art Survey Textbooks’, paper delivered at the Res Difficiles 3 conference, 20 May (https://youtu.be/ZFCAvf6VOSY).Google Scholar
Padilla Peralta, D. (2020a), ‘Epistemicide: The Roman Case’, Classica 33.2, 151–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Padilla Peralta, D. (2020b), Divine Institutions. Religions and Community in the Middle Republic (Princeton, NJ/Oxford).Google Scholar
Paltineri, S. (2015), ‘The Ligurians’, in Farney, G.D. and Bradley, G. (eds), The Peoples of Ancient Italy (Boston, MA/Berlin), 673–700.Google Scholar
Peterson, W. (1911), M. Tulli Ciceronis Orationes Cum senatui gratias egit; Cum populo gratias egit; De domo sua; De haruspicum responso; Pro Sestio; In Vatinium; De Provinciis Consularibus; Pro Balbo (Oxford).Google Scholar
Rankine, P. (2011), ‘Black Apollo?’, in Orrells, D., Bhambra, G.K., and Roynon, T. (eds), African Athena: New Agendas (Oxford/New York), 40–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rankine, P. (2021), ‘Pre-Racial Fantasies: Locating Antiquity and the American Stage at the fin de siècle’, paper delivered at the RaceB4Race conference, 6 May (Arizona Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies).Google Scholar
Snowden, F.M. (1960), ‘Some Greek and Roman Observations on the Ethiopian’, Traditio 16, 19–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snowden, F.M. (1970), Blacks in Antiquity: Ethiopians in the Greco-Roman Experience (Cambridge, MA/London).Google Scholar
Vasaly, A. (1993), Representations. Images of the World in Ciceronian Oratory ( Berkeley, CA/Los Angeles, CA/London).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vasaly, A. (2002), ‘Cicero's Early Speeches’, in May, J.M. (ed.), Brill's Companion to Cicero. Oratory and Rhetoric (Leiden/Boston, MA), 71–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, J.H.C. (2001), Beyond the Rubicon. Romans and Gauls in Republican Italy (Oxford).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolf, G. (2011), Tales of the Barbarians. Ethnography and Empire in the Roman West (Chichester, West Sussex/Malden, MA).CrossRefGoogle Scholar