Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-jwnkl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T17:26:00.553Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Judgement and Atmosphere in Epic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2014

David M. Gaunt*
Affiliation:
University of Bristol
Get access

Extract

These quotations exemplify a general consensus among critics that the narrative poet must not be seen in process of shaping our opinions for us. Most people would agree that moralising interruptions disrupt the reader's chain of thought and weaken his hold on the world which the narrator is creating. We want to see as little as possible of the author's thought-processes; he should follow Schiller's precept and remain as invisible behind his material as the Creator behind his Universe. When in The Eustace Diamonds Trollope begins a paragraph about Frank Greystock by saying ‘Within the figure and frame and clothes and cuticle, within the bones and flesh of many of us, there is but one person, — a man or woman, with a preponderance either of good or of evil. …’, the reader will, according to his nature, either grit his teeth and pursue the homily to its conclusion a page and a half later, or skip to the next point in the narrative. Most modern readers wish that Trollope would spare them. But in fact even Homer, ‘rapid and direct’ as he is, does sometimes pause for a word of moralising comment. Perhaps the most striking occasion is at Il. XXIII, 24, where Achilles has in mind the mutilation of Hector's body, and Homer describes such deeds as aeikea (‘unseemly’).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Aureal Publications 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Ker, W. P., Epic and Romance (London, 1908Google Scholar) ch. 1.

2. Lewis, C. Day, The Lyric Impulse (London, 1965CrossRefGoogle Scholar) ch. 3.

3. Cf. following section.

4. Lucan, De Bello Civili I. 8–9.

5. Duckworth, G. E., Foreshadowing and Suspense in the Epics of Homer, Apollo-nius, and Virgil (Princeton, 1933Google Scholar).

6. T.L.S., 6 April 1973.

7. Cited by Gregor, I. and Nicholas, B., The Moral and the Story (London, 1962) 259Google Scholar.

8. Cf. Segal, C. P., ‘The Achievement of Vergil’, Arion 4 (1965) 144–5Google Scholar.

9. Woolf, Virginia, ‘On Not Knowing Greek’, in Collected Essays vol. I (London, 1966Google Scholar).

10. de la Mare, W., Desert Islands (London, 1930) 77Google Scholar (in an end-note on ‘The Romance Enshrined in the Old Testament’).

11. Nowotny, W., The Language Poets use (London, 1962) 2Google Scholar.

12. Iliad VIII. 553ff., omitting intrusive lines.

13. Hackett, Sir J., Reflections upon Epic Warfare, PCA 68 (1971) 13ffGoogle Scholar.

14. Cf. Parry, A., ‘The Language of Achilles’, TAP A 87 (1956) IffGoogle Scholar.

15. Bell, G., The Desert and the Sown (London, 1907) 120Google Scholar.

16. Numbers 22. 28–30.

17. Segal, C. P., ‘The Achievement of Virgil’, Arion 4 (1965) 137Google Scholar.

18. Lewis, C. S., ‘On Stories’, in Essays Presented to Charles Williams (Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1966Google Scholar).

19. Sir John Hackett, op. cit. 28.

20. For a discussion, cf. Gaunt, D. M., Surge and Thunder (Oxford, 1971Google Scholar).

21. Cf. I. 494–505, 637–642, 697–714, 725–730; IV. 136–9.

22. D. M. Gaunt, op cit.

23. Heitland, W. E., Intro, to C. E. Haskins' edition of Pharsalia (London, 1887) lxxiGoogle Scholar.