Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-rkxrd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T06:24:58.024Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

UNCLES EX MACHINA: FAMILIAL EPIPHANY IN EURIPIDES’ ELECTRA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 December 2016

Rosa Andújar
Rosa Andújar*
Affiliation:
King's College Londonrosa.andujar@kcl.ac.uk
Get access

Extract

At the close of Euripides’ Electra, the Dioscuri suddenly appear ‘on high’ to their distraught niece and nephew, who have just killed their mother, the divine twins’ mortal sister. This is in fact the second longest extant deus ex machina (after the final scene in Hippolytus), and the only scene in which a tragedian attempts to resolve directly the aftermath of the matricide. In this article, I argue that Castor's and Polydeuces’ sudden apparition to Orestes and Electra constitutes a specialised point of intersection between the mortal and immortal realms in Greek tragedy: familial epiphany, an appearance by a god who has an especially intimate relationship with those on stage. Euripides’ focus on the familial divine as a category accentuates various contradictions inherent to both ancient Greek theology and dramaturgy. The Dioscuri are a living paradox, ambiguously traversing the space between dead heroes and gods, managing at the same time to occupy both. They oscillate uniquely between the mortal and immortal worlds, as different sources assign different fathers to each brother, and others speak of each one possessing divinity on alternate days. As I propose, the epiphany of these ambiguous brothers crystallises the problem of the gods’ physical presence in drama. Tragedy is the arena in which gods burst suddenly into the mortal realm, decisively and irrevocably altering human action. The physical divine thus tends to be both marginal and directorial, tasked with reining in the plot or directing its future course. The appearance of the familial divine, on the other hand, can in fact obscure the resolution and future direction of a play, undermining the authority of the tragic gods. In the specific case of Electra, I contend that the involvement of the Dioscuri, who are Electra's and Orestes’ maternal uncles, produces a sense of claustrophobia at the close of the play, which simultaneously denies the resolution that is expected from a deus ex machina while also revealing the pessimistic nature of what is typically considered a reassuringly ‘domestic’ and character driven drama.

Type
Research Article
Information
Ramus , Volume 45 , Issue 2 , December 2016 , pp. 165 - 191
Copyright
Copyright © Aureal Publications 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allan, W. (2000), The Andromache and Euripidean Tragedy (Oxford).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernabé, A. (1996), Poetarum Epicorum Graecorum Testimonia et Fragmenta: Pars 1 (Stuttgart).Google Scholar
Bouvrie, S. des (2004), ‘Olympia and the Epinikion: A Creation of Symbols’, in Myth and Symbol II: Symbolic Phenomena in Ancient Greek Culture. Papers from the Second and Third International Symposia on Symbolism at the Norwegian Institute at Athens, September 21-24, 2000 and September 19-22, 2002 (Bergen: Papers from the Norwegian Institute at Athens 7), 353-91.Google Scholar
Bravo, J. (2004), ‘Heroic Epiphanies: Narrative, Visual, and Cultic Contexts’, ICS 29, 63-84.Google Scholar
Burkert, W. (1985), Greek Religion, tr. Raffan, J. (Cambridge MA).Google Scholar
Burnett, A.P. (1998), Revenge in Attic and Later Tragedy (Berkeley).Google Scholar
Camp, J.M. (1978), ‘A Spear Butt from the Lesbians’, Hesperia 47, 192-95.Google Scholar
Cartledge, P. (2001), Spartan Reflections (London).Google Scholar
Chourmouziades, N.C. (1965), Production and Imagination in Euripides: Form and Function of the Scenic Space (Athens).Google Scholar
Conacher, D.J. (1967), Euripidean Drama: Myth, Theme and Structure (Toronto).Google Scholar
Cook, A.B. (1914), Zeus: A Study in Ancient Religion Vol. 1 (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Cox, C.A. (1998), Household Interests: Property, Marriage Strategies, and Family Dynamics in Ancient Athens (Princeton).Google Scholar
Cropp, M.J. (1986), ‘ Heracles, Electra and the Odyssey ’, in Cropp, M., Fantham, E. and Scully, S.E. (eds.), Greek Tragedy and its Legacy: Essays Presented to D.J. Conacher (Calgary), 187-200.Google Scholar
Cropp., M.J. (2013), Euripides Electra 2 (Warminster).Google Scholar
Cropp., M.J., Lee, K. and Sansone, D. (eds.) (1999-2000), Euripides and Tragic Theatre in the Late Fifth Century (Champaign IL) = ICS 24-25.Google Scholar
Dale, A.M. (1967), Euripides Helen (Oxford).Google Scholar
Davies, M. (1988a), Epicorum Graecorum Fragmenta (Göttingen).Google Scholar
Davies, M. (1988b), Poetarum Melicorum Graecorum Fragmenta Vol. 1 (Oxford).Google Scholar
Denniston, J.D. (1939), Euripides Electra (Oxford).Google Scholar
Diggle, J. (1984), Euripidis Fabulae Vol. 1 (Oxford).Google Scholar
Dingel, J. (1969), ‘Der 24. Gesang der Odyssee und die Elektra des Euripides’, RhM 112, 103-90.Google Scholar
Donzelli, G.B. (1978), Studio sull'Elettra di Euripide (Catania).Google Scholar
Dunn, F.M. (1996), Tragedy's End: Closure and Innovation in Euripidean Drama (Oxford).Google Scholar
Easterling, P.E. (1993), ‘Gods on Stage in Greek Tragedy’, in Dalfen, J., Petersmann, G. and Schwarz, F. (eds.), Religio Graeco-Romana: Festschrift für Walter Pötscher (Horn), 77-86.Google Scholar
Falkner, T.M. (1998), ‘Containing Tragedy: Rhetoric and Self-Representation in Sophocles’ Philoctetes ’, ClAnt 17, 25-58.Google Scholar
Finglass, P.J. (2011), Sophocles Ajax (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Furley, W.D., and Bremer, J.M. (2001), Greek Hymns: Selected Cult Songs from the Archaic to the Hellenistic Period, Vol. 1 (Tübingen).Google Scholar
Gantz, T. (1993), Early Greek Myth: A Guide to Literary and Artistic Sources (Baltimore).Google Scholar
Garvie, A.F. (1965), ‘A Note on the Deity of Alcman's Partheneion ’, CQ 15, 185-87.Google Scholar
Gellie, G. (1981), ‘Tragedy and Euripides’ Electra ’, BICS 28, 1-12.Google Scholar
Goff, B. (1999-2000), ‘Try to Make it Real Compared to What? Euripides’ Electra and the Play of Genres’, in Cropp, Lee and Sansone (above), 93-105.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. (1986), Reading Greek Tragedy (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Griffith, M. (2009), ‘Orestes and the In-Laws’, in McCoskey, D.E. and Zakin, E. (eds.), Bound by the City: Greek Tragedy, Sexual Difference, and the Formation of the Polis (Albany NY), 275-330.Google Scholar
Hall, E. (2013), Adventures with Iphigenia in Tauris: A Cultural History of Euripides' Black Sea Tragedy (Oxford).Google Scholar
Hamilton, R. (1982), Euripides’ Hippolytus 2 (Bryn Mawr).Google Scholar
Hartigan, K.V. (1991), Ambiguity and Self-Deception: The Apollo and Artemis Plays of Euripides (Frankfurt).Google Scholar
Hawthorne, K. (2006), ‘Political Discourses at the End of Sophokles’ Philoktetes ’, ClAnt 25, 243-76.Google Scholar
Henrichs, A. (1993), ‘“He Has a God in Him”: Human and Divine in the Modern Perception of Dionysus’, in Carpenter, T.H. and Faraone, C.A. (eds.), Masks of Dionysus (Ithaca NY), 13-43.Google Scholar
Henry, W.B. (2005), Pindar's Nemeans: A Selection (Munich).Google Scholar
Holt, P. (1989), ‘The End of the Trachiniae and the Fate of Herakles’, JHS 109, 69-80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jedrkiewicz, S. (2012), ‘Vengeur? Sauveur? Menteur? Apollon aux yeux des “trois Electres”’, Lexis 30, 294-307.Google Scholar
Jones, M. (2012), ‘Siblings in the Choephori: A Psychoanalytic Approach’, Lexis 30, 134-44.Google Scholar
Jouan, J. (2000), ‘Héros tragique et deus ex machina dans deux pièces perdues d'Euripide’, in Pirenne-Delforge, V. and Suárez de la Torre, E. (eds.), Héros et héroïnes dans les mythes et les cultes grecs (Liège), 29-39.Google Scholar
Judet de la Combe, P. (2012), ‘Le théâtre, au-delà de la metathéâtralité: sur la fin de l’Electre d'Euripide’, Lexis 30, 341-53.Google Scholar
Kitto, H.D. (1939), Greek Tragedy: A Literary Study (London).Google Scholar
Klöckner, A. (2010), ‘Getting in Contact: Concepts of Human-Divine Encounter in Classical Greek Art’, in Bremmer, J.N. and Erskine, A. (eds.), The Gods of Ancient Greece: Identities and Transformations (Edinburgh), 106-25.Google Scholar
Kovacs, D. (1985), ‘Castor in Euripides’ Electra (El. 307-13 and 1292-1307)’, CQ 35, 306-14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larson, J. (2007), Ancient Greek Cults: A Guide (London).Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, M. (1989), ‘“Impiety” and “Atheism” in Euripides’ Dramas’, CQ 39, 70-82.Google Scholar
Lloyd, M. (1986), ‘Realism and Character in Euripides’ Electra ’, Phoenix 40, 1-19.Google Scholar
Loraux, N. (1993), The Children of Athena: Athenian Ideas about Citizenship and the Division between the Sexes, tr. Levine, C. (Princeton).Google Scholar
Lorenz, T. (1992), ‘Die Epiphanie der Dioskuren’, in Froning, H., Hölscher, T. and Mielsch, H. (eds.), Kotinos: Festschrift für Erika Simon (Mainz/Rhein), 114-22.Google Scholar
Marshall, C.W. (1999-2000), ‘Theatrical Reference in Euripides’ Electra’, in Cropp, Lee and Sansone (above), 325-41.Google Scholar
Marshall, C.W. (2014), The Structure and Performance of Euripides’ Helen (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Mastronarde, D.J. (1990), ‘Actors on High: The Skene-Roof, the Crane, and the Gods in Attic Drama’, ClAnt 9, 247-94.Google Scholar
Mastronarde, D.J. (2002), ‘Euripidean Tragedy and Theology’, SemRom 5, 17-49.Google Scholar
Mastronarde, D.J. (2005), ‘The Gods’, in Gregory, J. (ed.), A Companion to Greek Tragedy (Malden MA), 321-32.Google Scholar
Michelini, A.N. (1987), Euripides and the Tragic Tradition (Madison).Google Scholar
Otto, W.F. (1965), Dionysus: Myth and Cult, tr. Palmer, R.B. (Bloomington).Google Scholar
Papadopoulou, T. (2001), ‘Representations of Athena in Greek Tragedy’, in Deacy, S. and Villing, A. (eds.), Athena in the Classical World (Leiden), 293-310.Google Scholar
Parker, R. (1999), ‘Through a Glass Darkly: Sophocles and the Divine’, in Griffin, J. (ed.), Sophocles Revisited: Essays Presented to Sir Hugh Lloyd-Jones (Oxford), 11-30.Google Scholar
Poltera, O. (2008), Simonides Lyricus, Testimonia und Fragmente: Einleitung, kritische Ausgabe, Übersetzung und Kommentar (Basel).Google Scholar
Porter, J.R. (1990), ‘Tiptoeing through the Corpses: Euripides’ Electra, Apollonius, and the Bouphonia ’, GRBS 31, 255-80.Google Scholar
Pritchett, W.K. (1979), ‘Military Epiphanies’, in The Greek State at War. Part III: Religion (Berkeley), 11-46.Google Scholar
Pucci, P. (1985), ‘Epifanie testuali nell’ Iliade ’, SIFC 3 ser. 3, 170-83.Google Scholar
Pucci, P. (1988), ‘Strategia epifanica e intertestualità nel secondo libro dell’Iliade ’, SIFC 3 ser. 6, 5-24.Google Scholar
Pucci, P. (1994), ‘Gods’ Intervention and Epiphany in Sophocles’, AJPh 115, 15-46.Google Scholar
Pucci, P. (2012), ‘Jeux de miroirs dans l’Electre d'Euripide’, Lexis 30, 308-17.Google Scholar
Rehm, R. (1988), ‘Staging of the Suppliant Plays’, GRBS 29, 263-307.Google Scholar
Ringer, M. (1998), Electra and the Empty Urn: Metatheater and Role Playing in Sophocles (Chapel Hill/London).Google Scholar
Ritchie, W. (1964), The Authenticity of the Rhesus of Euripides (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Robbins, E. (2013), ‘The Divine Twins in Early Greek Poetry’, in Thalia Delighting in Song: Essays on Ancient Greek Poetry (Toronto), 238-53.Google Scholar
Roberts, D.H. (1988), ‘Sophoclean Endings: Another Story’, Arethusa 21, 177-94.Google Scholar
Sbardella, L. (2003), ‘Mogli o buoi? Lo scontro tra Tindaridi ed Afaretidi da Pindaro ai poeti alessandrini’, in Nicolai, R. (ed.), ΡΥΣΜΟΣ: Studi di poesia, metrica e musica greca offerti dagli allievi a Luigi Enrico Rossi per i suoi settant'anni (Roma), 133-50.Google Scholar
Schein, S. (2013), Sophocles Philoctetes (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Schlegel, A.W. (1883), Lectures on Dramatic Art and Literature, tr. Black, J. (London).Google Scholar
Seaford, R. (2006), Dionysos (London/New York).Google Scholar
Segal, C. (1997), Dionysiac Poetics and Euripides’ Bacchae (Princeton).Google Scholar
Slatkin, L. (2011), The Power of Thetis and Selected Essays (Cambridge MA).Google Scholar
Sourvinou-Inwood, C. (1997), ‘Tragedy and Religion: Constructs and Readings’, in Pelling, C. (ed.), Greek Tragedy and the Historian (Oxford), 161-86.Google Scholar
Sourvinou-Inwood, C. (2003), Tragedy and Athenian Religion (Lanham MD).Google Scholar
Taplin, O. (1977), The Stagecraft of Aeschylus: The Dramatic Use of Exits and Entrances in Greek Tragedy (Oxford).Google Scholar
Taplin, O. (1996), ‘Comedy and the Tragic’, in Silk, M.S. (ed.), Tragedy and the Tragic: The Greek Theatre and Beyond (Oxford), 188-202.Google Scholar
Vernant, J.-P. (1991), Mortals and Immortals: Collected Essays, ed. and tr. Zeitlin, F. (Princeton).Google Scholar
Vickers, B. (1973), Towards Greek Tragedy: Drama, Myth and Society (London).Google Scholar
Voigt, E.-M. (1971), Sappho et Alcaeus: Fragmenta (Amsterdam).Google Scholar
West, M.L. (1975), Immortal Helen (London).Google Scholar
West, M.L. (1987), Euripides Orestes (Warminster).Google Scholar
Whitehorne, J.E.G. (1978), ‘The Ending of Euripides’ Electra ’, RBPh 56, 5-14.Google Scholar
Wildberg, C. (1999-2000), ‘Piety as Service, Epiphany as Reciprocity: Two Observations on the Religious Meaning of the Gods in Euripides’, in Cropp, Lee and Sansone (above), 235-56.Google Scholar
Wildberg, C. (2002), Hyperesie und Epiphanie: ein Versuch über die Bedeutung der Götter in den Dramen des Euripides (Munich).Google Scholar
Wiles, D. (2007), Mask and Performance in Greek Tragedy: From Ancient Festival to Modern Experimentation (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Woodford, S. (1971), ‘Cults of Heracles in Attica’, in Mitten, D.G., Pedley, J.G. and Scott, J.A. (eds.), Studies Presented to George M.A. Hanfmann (Mainz), 211-15.Google Scholar
Wright, M. (2005), Euripides’ Escape-Tragedies (Oxford).Google Scholar
Zeitlin, F. (1970), ‘The Argive Festival of Hera and Euripides’ Electra ’, TAPhA 101, 645-69.Google Scholar
Zielinski, T. (1925), Tragodumenon libri tres (Krakow).Google Scholar
Zuntz, G. (1955), The Political Plays of Euripides (Manchester).Google Scholar