Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T08:16:00.743Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Expert CALL: data-based versus knowledge-based interaction and feedback

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 December 2008

Jesús Soria
Jesús Soria
Affiliation:
University of Northumbria at Newcastle
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article attempts to define Expert CALL, siting in between traditional data-based CALL and intelligent CALL (ICALL). It relies on the concapts of expert knowledge and expert interaction and feedback. These are explored in the context of inflexional morphology, using as reference the auther's own ‘The Spanish Verb’ program. An electic computational algorithm, rather than a fully-fledged linguistic for malism suffices to deliver a stable and reliable lingustic knowledge basa on which to base Expert CALL applications. A similar ‘intermediate technology’ approach to syntax may bypass current difficulties encountered by ICALL to deliver linguistic reliabity.

Type
Research Article
Information
ReCALL , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , November 1997 , pp. 43 - 50
Copyright
Copyright © European Association for Computer Assisted Language Learning 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Crisswell, E. (1992) ‘Intelligent automated strategies of teaching foreign language in context’. In Swartz, M. L. and Yazdani, (eds.), Intelligent Tutiring Systems for Foreign Language Learning, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 307–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Decoo, W. (1993) ‘In defence of drill and practice in CALL: a re-evalution of fundamental strategies’ Computers & Education 23 (1\2). (Selected Papers from Eurocall 93 conference.)Google Scholar
Kane-Iturrioz, R. (1997) ‘Computer-based language assessmant: a formative approach’. ReCALL 9 (1), 15–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, B. (1995) ‘Cannot without process of speech be told: learning from the failures of computational modelling’. In Gimeno, A. (ed.), EUROCALL 95: Proceedings, Valencia: Universidad Politécnica.Google Scholar
McCarthy, B. (1996) ‘Fully integrated CALL: mission accomplished’. ReCALL 8 (2), 17–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manning, P. (1996) ‘Exploratory teaching of grammar rules and CALL’. ReCALL 8 (1), 24–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, C. (1992) ‘Going AI: foundations of ICALL’. CALL 5 (1\2).Google Scholar
Matthews, C. (1994) ‘Intelligent COmputer Assisted LAnguage Learning as congnitive science: the choice of syntacic frameworks for language tutoring’. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Rducation 5 (4), 533–556.Google Scholar