Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-rkxrd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T19:27:13.718Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Can Belgium Borrow Itself out of the Budget Deficit?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2016

Michele Fratianni
Get access

Extract

The deficit of the general government averaged 1.5 percent of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in the 1960s, 5.0 percent in the 1970’s, and 11.9 percent in the 1981-84 period. This growth occurred depite a sharp rise in the average tax burden, as tax revenues went from 31.7 percent of GDP in the 1960s to 41.3 percent in the 1970s and 46.3 percent in the 1981-84 period. The engine of the budget deficit has been and continues to be the rise in expenditures.

This note raises two questions. First, is the existing structure of expenditures, taxation, growth of output, and real interest rate consistent with a stable (that is, finite) ratio of government debt to GDP. The answer is no. The second question asks what economic conditions will have to emerge to stabilize the bond-to-income ratio of the nation. There is no unique answer to this question; nonetheless, I offer one solution whose «realism» may be beyond the scope of what political economy can yield at the moment.

Type
Research Article
Information
Recherches Économiques de Louvain/ Louvain Economic Review , Volume 53 , Issue 1 , March 1987 , pp. 89 - 96
Copyright
Copyright © Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de recherches économiques et sociales 1987 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

(*)

Indiana University and Visiting Professor at the Catholic University of Louvain. I want to thank Guy Verfaille for revealing some of the more mysterious parts of the Belgian data; and Paul De Grauwe, Theo Peeters and Anton Banen for discussions on this topic.

References

REFERENCES

Boeykens, D. & Vuchelen, J. (1984), De marktwaarde van de obligatieschuld van de overheid, typescript.Google Scholar
Commission of the European Communities (1984), European Economy, November, Brussels.Google Scholar
Cukierman, A. & Mortensen, J. (1983), Monetary Assets and Inflation Induced Distortions of the National Accounts – Conceptual Issues and Correction of Sectoral Income Flows in Five EEC Countries, Economic Papers of the European Economic Commission, DG II.Google Scholar
De Grau We, P. & Verfaille, G. (1984), Zijn de rentelasten van de overheidsschuld ondraaglijk geworden?, Leuvense Economische Standpunten, 1984/31.Google Scholar
De Grauwe, P., Fratianni, M. & Mustapha, N. (1985), Exchange Rate, Money and Output: the European Experience, London, Macmillan.Google Scholar
Darby, M.R. (1984), Some Pleasant Monetarist Arithmetic, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, Quarterly Review, pp. 15–20.Google Scholar
International Monetary Fund, International Financial Statistics, Yearbook 1984, Washington D.C. Google Scholar
Mccallum, B.T. (1981), Monetarist Principles and the Money Stock Growth Rule, American Economic Review, vol. 71, n° 2.Google Scholar
Ministrèe des Affaires économiques (1985), Aperçu économique trimestriel, 1/85, Brussels.Google Scholar
Ministerie van Financien (1985), Documentatieblad.Google Scholar
Sargent, T.J. & Wallace, N. (1981), Some Unpleasant Monetarist Arithmetic, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, Quarterly Review, pp. 1–17.Google Scholar