Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-lvtdw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-16T19:29:44.266Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

How growth and location are sensitive to transport and telecommunication infrastructures?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2016

Stéphane Riou*
Affiliation:
Creuset, University of Saint-Etienne, France
Get access

Summary

This paper is an extension of the new economic geography and growth model of Martin (1999) which proposes an interesting framework to analyze the effects of the european regional policy. We introduce imperfect interregional knowledge spillovers in this framework which are diffused by two infrastructures: transport and telecommunication infrastructures. If an investment in transport infrastructures may be at the origin of a centrifugal effect through non market interactions, we show that only a policy improving telecommunication can reduce regional inequalities and attain higher aggregate growth rate.

Résumé

Résumé

Cet article propose un prolongement du modèle d'économie géographique et de croissance de Martin [1999] qui offre un cadre intéressant pour analyser les effets de la politique régionale européenne. Nous introduisons des externalités technologiques inter-régionales imparfaites qui se diffusent par des infrastructures de transport et de télécommunication. Nous montrons alors qu'une politique d'infrastructures de transport peut engendrer un effet de dispersion des activités économiques en facilitant les interactions hors-marché. Néanmoins seule une politique de télécommunication semblerait théoriquement en mesure à la fois de diminuer les inégalités régionales et de favoriser la croissance globale.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de recherches économiques et sociales 2003 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Address: Creuset, Université Jean Monnet, 6, rue basse des rives, 42023 Saint-Etienne cedex 02. e-mail: stephane.riou@univ-st-etienne.tr

References

Baldwin, R. and Forslid, R. (2000), “The Core-Periphery model and endogenous growth : stabilizing and de-stabilizing integration”, Economica, (67)3 pp. 307324.Google Scholar
Baldwin, R., Martin, Ph. and Ottaviano, G. (2001), “Global Income Divergence, Trade and Industrialisation : the geography of growth take-offs”, Journal of Economic Growth, 6, pp. 537.Google Scholar
Baldwin, R., Forslid, R., Martin, Ph., Ottaviano, G. and Robert-Nicoud, F. (2003), Economic geography and public policy, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Caballero, R. and Jaffe, A. (1993), “Standing on the Giant’s Shoulder: an assessment of knowledge spillovers and creative destruction in a model of economic growth”, NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 8, pp. 1573.Google Scholar
Cairncross, F. (2001), The death of distance : how the communication revolution will change our lives, Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Dixit, A.K. and Stiglitz, J.E. (1977), “Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity”, American Economic Review, 67, pp. 297308.Google Scholar
Eaton, J. and Kortum, S. (1997), “International technology diffusion : theory and measurement”, Working Paper 4931, NBER.Google Scholar
Englmann, F.C. and Walz, U. (1995), “Industrial centers and regional growth in the presence of local inputs”, Journal of Regional Science, 35(1), pp. 327.Google Scholar
European Commission (1999), Sixth periodic report on the social and economic situation and development of the regions of the community, Bruxelles.Google Scholar
Feldman, M. (1994), The Geography of Innovation, Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Gaspar, J. and Glaeser, E. (1998), “Information technology and the future of cities”, Journal of Urban Economics, 43, pp. 136156.Google Scholar
Grossman, G. and Helpman, E. (1991), Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy, Cambridge USA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jaffe, A. (1989), “Real effects of academic research”, American Economic Review, 79, pp. 957–70.Google Scholar
Krugman, P. (1991), “Increasing returns and economic geography”, Journal of Political Economy, 99, pp. 483–99.Google Scholar
Kuznets, S. (1966), Modern economic growth, rate structure and spread, New Haven, Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Marshall, A. (1926), Principles of Economics, 7 th ed., London, Macmillan.Google Scholar
Martin, P. (1998), “Can regional policies affect growth and geography in Europe”, World Economy, (21) 6, pp. 757774.Google Scholar
Martin, P. (1999), “Public policies, regional inequalities and growth”, Journal of Public Economics, pp. 73, 27.Google Scholar
Martin, P. (2000), “A quoi servent les politiques régionales?”, Économie Internationale, 81, pp. 319.Google Scholar
Martin, P. and Ottaviano, G.(1999), “Growing location : industry location in a model of endogeneous growth”, European Economie Review, (43)2, pp. 281302.Google Scholar
Martin, P. and Rogers, C.A. (1995), “Industrial location and public infrastructure”, Journal of International Economies, 39, pp. 335–51.Google Scholar
Maurseth, B. and Verspagen, B. (1999), “Knowledge spillovers in Europe. A patent citation analysis”, MERIT, Discussion Paper.Google Scholar
Quah, D. (1996), Regional cohesion from local isolated actions : I. historical outcomes, mimeo, London School of Economic.Google Scholar
Quah, D. (2000), “Internet cluster emergence”, Working Paper 441, London School of Economic.Google Scholar
Riou, S. (2002), “When transport infrastructures promote global growth and regional cohesion?”, Discussion Paper, Creuset, University of Saint-Étienne.Google Scholar
Romer, P. (1990), “Endogenous technological change”, Journal of Political Economy, 98 (5), pp. 71102.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. (1954), “The transfer problem and transport costs: analysis of effects of trade impediments”, Economic Journal, 64, pp. 264–89.Google Scholar
Venables, A. (2001), Geography and international inequalities : the impact of new technologies, mimeo, London School of Economic.Google Scholar
Walz, U. (1996), “Transport costs, intermediate goods and localized growth”, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 26, pp. 671695.Google Scholar