Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-rvbq7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T13:36:58.875Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

M-Form adoption and firm performance : an empirical investigation*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2016

R.S. Thompson
R.S. Thompson*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, University College, Cork
Get access

Extract

This paper presents the results of an empirical study on the relationship between internal structural change and performance, in a sample of 138 large U.K. companies, 1959-1976. The paper considers the introduction of the multidivisional form (M-form) within the sample and addresses itself to three principal questions:

Firstly, whether re-organization to an M-form structure followed a significant decline in the performance of the firm?

Secondly, whether M-form adoption was followed by a significant improvement in performance?

Finally, was the performance impact, if any, of re-organization related in a systematic way to firm characteristics — e.g. size, diversification etc. — in a manner consistent with the M-form hypothesis?

Type
Research Article
Information
Recherches Économiques de Louvain/ Louvain Economic Review , Volume 49 , Issue 1 , March 1983 , pp. 3 - 24
Copyright
Copyright © Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de recherches économiques et sociales 1983 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Valuable comments on earlier drafts of this paper were received from Tony Appleyard, John Cable, Landis Gabel, Leonard Wrigley and participants at the nineth E.A.R.I.E. Conference. Leuven 1982. In addition, the paper has benefited greatly from a number of points made by two anonymous referees of this Journal. None of these individuals, however, bears responsibility for the remaining shortcomings. Financial assistance from the Management Fund, UCC., is gratefully acknowledged.

References

REFERENCES

Allen, S.A. (1978), Organizational Choice and General Management Networks in Divisionalized Companies. Academy of Management Journal, 21 (3) 341–65.Google Scholar
Allen, S.A. (1979), Understanding Reorganizations of Divisionalized Companies, Academy of Management Journal, 22, (4) 641–71.Google Scholar
Appleyard, A.R. (1980), Takeovers : Accounting Policy, Financial Policy and the Case Against Accounting Measures of Performance: A Synopsis, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 7, pp. 41–54.Google Scholar
Armour, H., and Teece, D.J. (1978), Organizational Structure and Economic Performance: A Test of the Multidivisional Form Hypothesis, Bell Journal of Economics, 9 (Spring), 106–22.Google Scholar
Arrow, K.J. (1974), On the Agenda of Organizations, in Marris, R. (Ed.), The Corporate Society, Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bhargava, N. (1973), The Impact of Organizational Form on the Firm: Experience of 1920–70. Unpublished Ph. D. thesis University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Cable, J. and Dirrheimer, M.J. (1983), Hierarchies and Markets : An Empirical Test of the Multidivisional Hypothesis in West Germany, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 1, 1, 43–62.Google Scholar
Castagna, A.D. and Malotecy, Z.P. (1981), The Market Characteristics of Failed Companies, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 8, pp. 467–504.Google Scholar
Caves, R. (1980), Corporate Strategy and Structure, Journal of Economic Literature, 18, pp. 64–92.Google Scholar
Chandler, A.D. (1963), Strategy and Structure : Chapter in the History of American Industrial Entreprise. M.I.T. Press, Cambridge Mass.Google Scholar
Chandler, A.D. (1982), The M-form : Industrial Groups, American Style, European Economic Review, 19, 3–23.Google Scholar
Channon, O.P. (1978), The Service Industries Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Cyert, R.M. and March, J. (1963), A Behavioural Theory of the Firm, Prentice Hall, Engle-wood Cliffs, N.J. Google Scholar
Dawson, S. and Wedderburn, D. (1980), Introduction in Woodward, J., Industrial Organization: Theory and Practice 2nd ed., Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Donaldson, L. (1982), Divisionalization and Size: A Theoretical and Empirical Critique, Organizational Studies, 3, 321–38.Google Scholar
King, B.F. (1960), Market and Industry Factors in Stock Price Behaviour, Journal of Business, 39, pp. 139–90.Google Scholar
Kuehn, D. (1975), Takeovers and the Theory of the Firm, Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Loasby, B. (1976), Choice, Complexity and Ignorance, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Marris, R. (1964), The Economic Theory of Managerial Capitalism, Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Mayers, D. and Rice, E.M. (1979), Measuring Portfolio Performance and the Empirical Content of Asset Pricing Models, Journal of Financial Economics, 3–28.Google Scholar
Roll, R.A. Critique of the Asset Pricing Theory’s Tests: Part 1, Journal of Financial Economics, 4, pp. 129–76.Google Scholar
Sharpe, W.F. (1963), A Simplified Model for Portfolio Analysis, Management Science, pp. 277–93.Google Scholar
Solomon, E. and Laya, J. (1967), Measurement of Company Profitability: Some Systematic Errors in the Accounting Rate of Return, in Robicheck, A. (Ed.), Financial Research and Management Decisions, John Wiley, N.Y. Google Scholar
Steer, P.A. and Cable, J. (1978), Internal Organization and Profit: An Empirical Analysis of Large U.K. Companies, Journal of Industrial Economics, 27, 13–30.Google Scholar
Teece, D.J. (1981), Internal Organization and Economic Performance, Journal of Industrial Economics, 30, 173–200.Google Scholar
Thompson, R.S., (1981), Internal Organization and Profit: A Note, Journal of Industrial Economics, 30, 201–13.Google Scholar
Thompson, R.S. (1982), The Diffusion and Performance Impact of the M-form in the U.K. : An Empirical Investigation, unpublished Ph. D. thesis, University of Newcastle-upon-Tyne, U.K. Google Scholar
Thompson, R.S. (1983), Diffusion of the M-form Structure in the U.K.: Rate of Imitation, Inter-firm and Inter-industry Differences, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 1, 297–315.Google Scholar
Williamson, O.E. (1971), «Managerial Discretion, Organization Form and the Multidivisio-nal Hypothesis», in Marris, R. and Wood, A. (Eds.), The Corporate Economy, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, O.E. (1975), Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications, Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
Williamson, O.E. and Bhargava, N. (1972), «Assessing and Classifying the Internal Control Structure and Apparatus of the Modern Corporation», In Cowling, K. (Ed.), Market Structure and Corporate Behaviour, (Gray Mills, London).Google Scholar
Wrigley, L.W. (1970), Divisional Autonomy and Diversification, Unpublished D.B.A. thesis, Harvard Business School.Google Scholar