Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qlrfm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-09T16:20:12.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

From Walras’s General Equilibrium to Hicks’s Temporary Equilibrium

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2016

Bruna Ingrao*
Affiliation:
Università di Sassari
Get access

Summary

Starting by and overview of open problems in the Walrasian heritage, the paper reviews tne debates which paved the way to Hicksian temporary equilibrium. In the late twenties and the thirties the open issue of equilibrium and business fluctuations gave rise to new research programmes centered on the need to add the time dimension in equilibrium analysis. The crucial result of the equilibrium and time controversy was that the general equilibrium concept cannot be defined unless it is related to a time horizon and to a process of planning over a time horizon. Ideas of intertemporal and temporary equilibrium in the writings of Hayek and Lindhal are examined in close connection with the debate on information and perfect foresight. The paper evaluates the novelty of Value and Capital with respect to the previous Austrian and Swedish contributions, arguing that the temporally equilibrium approach gained a more precise body of theory, but at the same time it lost its more innovative perspective.

L’objet de cet article est d’évaluer les débats qui ont conduit au concept d’équilibre temporaire de Hicks. A la fin des années 1920 et dans les années 1930 les problématiques de l’équilibre et des fluctuations conjoncturelles ont donné naissance à un nouveau programme de recherche centré sur la nécessité d’adjoindre la dimension temporelle à l’analyse de l’équilibre. Le résultat principal de cette controverse sur «l’équilibre et le temps» est la nécessité de rattacher le concept d’équilibre général à un processus de planification sur un horizon temporel et fini. L’article examine les notions d équilibres intertemporel et temporaire à la lumière de la controverse sur l’information et la perfection des prévisions. Enfin, l’article évalue la nouveauté du livre Value and Capital pour rapport aux contributions antérieures des auteurs autrichiens et suédois, par conclure que si, grâce à la contribution de Hicks, l’approche de l’équilibre temporaire a gagné une présentation théorique plus précise, c’est au prix d’un abandon d’une perspective plus innovatrice.

Keywords

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de recherches économiques et sociales 1989 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arrow, K. (1959), Toward a Theory of Price Adjustment, in: Abramovitz, W. (ed.), The Allocation of Economic Resources, Stanford University Press, Stanford.Google Scholar
Arrow, K. (1978), The Future and the Present in Economic Life, Economic Inquiry, 16, 157160.Google Scholar
Caldwell, B. (1988), Hayek’s transformation, History of Political Economy, Winter 1988.Google Scholar
Donzelli, F. (1986), Temporary Equilibrium, Intertemporal Equilibrium and the “Complete Markets’ Hypothesis”, Ricerche Economiche, XL, 23.Google Scholar
Donzelli, F. (1987), Il concetto di equilibrio nella teoria economica neoclassica, La Nuova Italia Scientifica, Roma.Google Scholar
Donzelli, F. (1988), Introduzione, in: Hayek, F., Conoscenza, mercato, pianificazione, Il Mulino, Bologna.Google Scholar
Hahn, F. (1989),General Equilibrium in an Imperfect World: Incomplete Markets, paper presented at the Conference ‘Emergence and Foundation of Equilibrium Concepts in Economies’, Strasbourg, 2122 SeptemberGoogle Scholar
Hayek, F. (1928), Intertemporal Price Equilibrium and Movements in the Value of Money, reprinted in Hayek (1984).Google Scholar
Hayek, F. (1935a), Price Expectations, Monetary Disturbances and Malinvestments, reprinted in Hayek (1975).Google Scholar
Hayek, F. (1935b), The Maintenance of Capital, reprinted in Hayek (1975).Google Scholar
Hayek, F. (1937), Economics and Knowledge, Economica, TV, 13, reprinted in Individualism and Economic Order, Routledge & Kegan, London, 1949.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. (1941), The Pure Theory of Capital, Routledge & Kegan, London.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. (1975), Profits, Interest and Investment and Other Essays on Industrial Fluctuations, Augustus M. Kelley, Clifton.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. (1984), Money, Capital and Fluctuations. Early Essays, Routledge & Kegan, London.Google Scholar
Hicks, J. (1939), Value and Capital, 2nd ed., 1946, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Hicks, J. (1973), Recollections and Documents, in: Economic Perspectives, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Hicks, J. (1977) Preface (and Survey), in: Economic Perspectives, Clarendon Press, Oxford Google Scholar
Ingrao, B. (1989a), The hidden epistemology of rational expectations and the paradoxes of rationality, Ricerche Economiche, July 1989.Google Scholar
Ingrao, B. (1989b), L’analogia meccanica nel pensiero di Pareto, paper presented at the annual meeting of the Società Italiana degli Economisti, Rome, 27 October 1989.Google Scholar
Ingrao, B. and Israel, G. (1985), General Economic Equilibrium Theory – A History of Ineffectual Paradigmatic Shifts, Fundamenta Scientiæ, 6, 1, pp. 145 and 6, 2, pp. 89–125.Google Scholar
Ingrao, B. and Israel, G. (1987), La mano invisibile, Laterza Bari.Google Scholar
Lindahl, E. (1929), The Place of Capital in the Theory of Price, in Lindahl (1939b).Google Scholar
Lindahl, E. (1930), The Rate of Interest and the Price Level, in Lindhal (1939b).Google Scholar
Lindahl, E. (1939a), The Dynamic Approach to Economic Theory, in Lindahl (1939b).Google Scholar
Lindahl, E. (1939b) Studies in the Theory of Money and Capital, reprint, Augustus M. Kelley, New York, 1970.Google Scholar
Lindahl, E. (ed.) (1958), K. Wicksell – Selected Papers on Economic Theory, reprint, Augustus M. Kelley, New York, 1969.Google Scholar
Milgate, M. 1979 On the Origin of the Notion of’Intertemporal Equilibrium’, Economica, 46, pp. 110 Google Scholar
Morgenstern, O. (1935), Perfect Foresight and Economic Equilibrium, reprinted in: Schotter, A. (ed.), Selected Economic Writings of Oskar Morgenstern, New York University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Morgenstern, O. (1941), Professor Hicks on Value and Capital, reprinted in: Schotter, A. (ed.), Selected Economic Writings of Oskar Morgenstern, New York University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Morgenstern, O. (1976) The Collaboration Between Oskar Morgenstern and John von Neumann on the Theory of Games, Journal of Economic Literature, 14, 3.Google Scholar
Myrdal, G. (1939), Monetary Equilibrium, William Hodge, London.Google Scholar
Ohlin, B. (1977) Keynesian Economics and The Stockholm School. A Comment on Don Patinkin’s Paper, in: Strom, S. and Thalberg, B. (eds.), The Theoretical Contributions of Knut Wicksell.Google Scholar
Pareto, V. (1895), Théorie mathématique des changes étrangers, reprinted in: Busino, G. (ed.), O. C. VIII, Librairie Droz, Genève, 1966.Google Scholar
Pareto, V. (1896–97), Cours d’économie politique, Lausanne, Rouge.Google Scholar
Pareto, V. (1901), Le equazioni dell’equilibrio dinamico, reprinted in: Busino, G. (ed.), O. C. VIII, Librairie Droz, Genève, 1982.Google Scholar
Pareto, V. (1902) Applicazioni delle matematiche all’economia politica, in: Busino, G. (ed.). O.C. VIII, Librairie Droz, Genève.Google Scholar
Pareto, V. (1906), Manuale di Economia Politica, reprint 1965, Bizzarri, Roma.Google Scholar
Pareto, V. (1911), Economic Mathématique, reprinted in: Busino, G. (ed.), O. C. VIII, Librairie Droz, Genève, 1966.Google Scholar
Patinkin, D. (1977), On the Relation between Keynesian Economics and the “Stockholm School”, in: Strom, S. and Thalberg, B. (eds.), The Theoretical Contributions of Knut Wicksell.Google Scholar
Radner, R. (1982), Equilibrium under Uncertainty, in: Arrow, K. and Mintriligator, D., (eds.), Handbook of Mathematical Economics, North Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J.A. (1949), Vilfredo Pareto (1848–1923), reprinted in: Ten Great Economists from Marx to Keynes, George Allen and Unwin, London Google Scholar
Walras, L. (1900), Eléments d’économie politique pure ou théorie de la richesse sociale, 4th ed., English translation by Jaffé, W..(ed.), Elements of Pure Economics, Allen and Unwin, London, 1954.Google Scholar
Wicksell, K. (1899), Vilfredo Pareto’s Cours d’économie politique, reprinted in Lindahl, (ed.) (1958).Google Scholar
Wicksell, K. (1911), Bohm-Bawerk’s Theory of Capital, reprinted in Lindahl, (ed.) (1958).Google Scholar
Wicksell, K. (1913), Vilfredo Pareto’s Manuel d’économie politique, reprinted in Lindahl, (ed.) (1958).Google Scholar