Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wp2c8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-14T08:09:42.488Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Income, Uncertainty and the Probability of Self-Employment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2016

Friedhelm Pfeiffer
Affiliation:
Universität Mannheim
Winfried Pohlmeier
Affiliation:
Universität Mannheim
Get access

Summary

This paper aims at investigating the determinants of self- employment within a structural model of discrete choice under uncertainty. The basic idea of our approach centres around Knight's (1921) famous view of entrepreneurs receiving risk-adjusted income that has to exceed the income of employees because of the greater variance of the income stream. Unlike previous econometric approaches, which use reduced form specifications that are more or less based on ad-hoc reasoning, we derive a choice equation of which the parameters have a clear interpretation in terms of the parameters of the underlying von Neumann-Morgenstern utility function. The specification allows to identify how the difference in income risk between wage-employment and self- employment enters the choice equation without approximating the risk difference via a reduced form specification. The model is estimated using a random effects panel probit estimator with unrestricted autocorrelation structure. Estimates are based on a balanced panel of 1,926 working men selected from the West German Socio-Economic Panel 1984 to 1989.

Résumé

Résumé

Le but de cet article est d'analyser les déterminants du travail indépendant dans un modèle structurel de choix discret dans un contexte d'incertitude. Notre approche est basée sur l'idée bien connue de Knight (1921), selon laquelle le revenu ajusté pour le risque des entrepreneurs doit dépasser la rémunération des employés en raison de la plus grande variance de leur flux de revenu. Alors que d'habitude les modèles économétriques s'appuient sur des spécifications plus ou moins ad hoc, nous dérivons une équation de comportement dont les paramètres sont directement interprétables à partir de la fonction d'utilité von Neumann-Morgenstern sous-jacente. Cette spécification permet de mesurer dans quelle mesure la différence aléatoire de revenu entre l'emploi salarié et le travail indépendant est incorporée dans l'équation de comportement sans que cette différence ne soit préalablment appéhender par une spécification de forme réduite. Le modèle est estimé en utilisant, sur des données en panel, un estimateur probit aléatoire à structure autocorrélée non restreinte. Les estimations sont basées sur un échantillon représentatif de 1926 travailleurs issus de donées socio-économiques ouest-allemandes pour le période 1984-1989.

Type
Part I: Labour Demand and Supply
Copyright
Copyright © Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de recherches économiques et sociales 1992 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

(*)

For helpful comments we would like to thank Axel Börsch-Supan, François Laisney, Jörn-Steffen Pischke, Sikandar Siddiqui as well as three anonymous referees. Bettina Burger and Donald DeVault provided qualified research assistance. Our special thanks go to Michael Lechner for his panel estimation programme. The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. The usual disclaimer applies.

References

REFERENCES

Blanchflower, D.G. and Meyer, B.D. (1991), A Longitudinal Analysis of Young Entrepreneurs in Australia and the United States, NBER Working Paper, n° 3746.Google Scholar
Blanchflower, D.G. and Oswald, A.J. (1990), What Makes a Young Entrepreneur?, NBER Working Paper, n° 3252.Google Scholar
Blau, D.M. (1987), A Time-Series Analysis of Self-Employment in the United States, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 95, n° 3, 445467.Google Scholar
Bögenhold, D. and Staber, U. (1990), Selbständigkeit als ein Reflex auf Arbeitslosigkeit? Makrosoziologische Befunde einer international- komparativen Studie, Kölner Zeitschrift fur Soziologic und Sozialpsychologie, vol. 42, n° 2, 265279.Google Scholar
Börsch-Supan, A. and Pfeifper, F. (1990), Determinanten der Selbständigkeit in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Schwerpunktprogramm der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft: Marktstruktur und gesamtwirtschaftliche Entwicklung. Working paper n° 5/91; a short version is published in Hujer, R. Schneider, H. and Zarf, Lund W., (eds.), Heraus forderungen an den Wohlfahrtsstaat im structurellen Wandel, Frankfurt: Campus.Google Scholar
Brock, W. A. and Evans, D. S. (1986), The Economics of Small Businesses. Their Role and Regulation in the U.S. Economy, A CERA Research Study, New York: Holmes & Meier.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, G. (1978), On the Use of Panel Data, paper presented at the Social Science Research Council conference on life-cycle aspects of employment and the labor market, Mt., Kisco, N. Y. Google Scholar
Chamberlain, G. (1984), Panel Data, Chapter 22 in Handbook of Econometrics, vol. II, Griliches, Z. and Intrilligator, M. D. (eds.), New York: Elsevier Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (eds.) (1990), Das Sozio-oekonomische Panel (SOEP), Benutzerhandbuch, Version 4 - Oktober/90, Berlin.Google Scholar
De Wit, G. and van Winden, F.A.A.M. (1989), An Empirical Analysis of Self-Employment in the Netherlands, Small Business Economics: An International Journal, vol. 1, n° 4, 263272.Google Scholar
Evans, D.S. and Jovanovich, B. (1989), An Estimated Model of Entrepreneurial Choice under Liquidity Constraints, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 97, n° 4, 808827.Google Scholar
Evans, D.S. and Leighton, L.S. (1989a), The Determinants of Changes in U.S. Self-Employment 1968-1987, Small Business Economics, vol. 1, n° 1, 111119.Google Scholar
Evans, D.S. and Leighton, L.S. (1989b), Some Empirical Aspects of Entrepreneurship, American Economic Review, vol. 79, n° 3, 519535.Google Scholar
Evans, D.S. and Leighton, L.S. (1990), Small Business Formation by Unemployed and Employed Workers, Small Business Ecnomics, vol. 2, n ° 4, 319330.Google Scholar
Fujii, E.T. and Hawley, C.B. (1991), Empirical Aspects of Self-Employment, Economics Letters, vol. 36, 323329.Google Scholar
bler, O. (1991), Was unterscheidet Freiberufler, Gewerbetreibende und abhängig Beschäftigte. Eine empirische Untersuchung über Gruppenhetero-genität, Einkommensdeterminanten und Statuswechsler, Mitteilungen aus der Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsfbrschung, vol. 24, n° 1, 101116.Google Scholar
Kaiser, M. and Otto, M. (1990), Übergang von Arbeitslosigkeit in berufliche Selbstándigkeit. Erste Ergebnisse aus IAB-Verlaufserhebungen bei Überbrückungsgeldempfángern nach 55 a AFG der Jahre 1986-1988, Mitteilungen aus der Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung, vol. 23, n ° 2, 284299.Google Scholar
Kihlstrom, R.E. and Laffont, J.-J. (1979), A General Equilibrium Entrepreneurial Theory of Firm Formation Based on Risk Aversion, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 87, n° 4, 719748.Google Scholar
Klinge, G. (1989), Europäischer Binnenmarkt 1992 - Niederlassungsrecht für Handwerker, Die Krankenversicherung, vol. 41, 177183.Google Scholar
Knight, F. (1921), Risk, Uncertainty and Profit, New York: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Lentz, B.F and Laband, D.N. (1990), Entrepreneurial Success and Occupational Inheritance among Proprietors, Canadian Journal of Economics, vol. 23, n° 3, 563579.Google Scholar
Pickles, A.R. and O'Farrel, (1987), An Analysis of Entrepreneurial Behaviour from Male Work Histories, Regional Studies, vol. 21, n° 5, 425444.Google Scholar
Rees, H. and Shah, A. (1986), An Empirical Analysis of Self-Employment in the U.K., Journal of Applied Econometrics, vol. 1, 95108.Google Scholar