Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T09:21:44.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Doing all things for God's glory, acting so that it is God who acts: Kierkegaard, Edwards, and the problem of total devotion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 August 2020

DANIEL M. JOHNSON Open the ORCID record for DANIEL M. JOHNSON [Opens in a new window]
DANIEL M. JOHNSON*
Affiliation:
English and Humanities Department, Shawnee State University, 940 Second Street, Portsmouth, OH, 45662, USA
*
e-mail: djohnson2@shawnee.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article accomplishes two things. First, it explores and defends Kierkegaard's distinctive solution to the Problem of Total Devotion, a problem which has been helpfully identified by Robert Adams. Second, it extends that solution by advancing an interpretation of the command to do all things to the glory of God (1 Corinthians 10:31) according to which we are being commanded to intentionally make every one of our actions such that it simultaneously counts as a divine action: in other words, to act intentionally in all things such that it is God who acts through us.

Type
Original Article
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 58 , Issue 1 , March 2022 , pp. 197 - 216
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, Robert M. (1986) ‘The problem of total devotion’, in Audi, Robert & Wainwright, William J. (eds) Rationality, Religious Belief, and Moral Commitment (Ithaca: Cornell University Press), 169–194.Google Scholar
Adams, Robert M. (1999) Finite and Infinite Goods (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Alexander, David E. (2014) Goodness, God, and Evil (New York: Bloomsbury).Google Scholar
Alexander, David E. & Johnson, Daniel M. (2016) Calvinism and the Problem of Evil (Eugene OR: Wipf & Stock).Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas (2003) On Evil, Davies, Brian (ed.) & Regan, Richard (tr.) (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Breiner, Nikolaus (unpublished) ‘Preferential relationships, but not preferential love: Kierkegaard and a proposal for the Ferreira–Krishek debate’.Google Scholar
Chernow, Ron (2017) Grant (New York: Penguin).Google Scholar
Edwards, Jonathan (2009) A Dissertation Concerning the End for Which God Created the World, in Paul Ramsey (ed.) Works of Jonathan Edwards, I (New Haven CT: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
Ferreira, M. J. (2001) Love's Grateful Striving: A Commentary on Kierkegaard's Works of Love (New York: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frame, John (2008) The Doctrine of the Christian Life (Phillipsburg NJ: Presbyterian & Reformed).Google Scholar
Johnson, Daniel M. (2011) ‘Kant, Hegel, and Kierkegaard's supposed irrationalism: a reading of Fear and Trembling’, Kierkegaard Studies Yearbook (2011), 51–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kierkegaard, Søren (1962) Works of Love, Hong, Howard & Hong, Edna (trs) (New York: Harper & Row)Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, Søren [Johannes De Silentio] (2006) Fear and Trembling, Stephen Evans, C. (ed.) & Walsh, Sylvia (tr.) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Koons, Robert C. (2002) ‘Dual agency: a Thomistic account of providence and human freedom’, Philosophia Christi, 4, 397–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kretzman, Norman (1991) ‘A general problem of creation: why would God create anything at all?’, in MacDonald, Scott (ed.) Being and Goodness: The Concept of the Good in Metaphysics and Philosophical Theology (Ithaca: Cornell University Press), 208–228.Google Scholar
Krishek, Sharon (2008) ‘Two forms of love: the problem of preferential love in Kierkegaard's Works of Love’, Journal of Religious Ethics, 36, 595–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krishek, Sharon (2014) ‘In defence of a faith-like model of love: a reply to John Lippitt's “Kierkegaard and the problem of special relationships: Ferreira, Krishek and the ‘God filter’”’, International Journal for the Philosophy of Religion, 75, 155–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, C. S. (1960) The Four Loves (Orlando FL: Harcourt).Google Scholar
Lippitt, John (2012) ‘Kierkegaard and the problem of special relationships: Ferreira, Krishek and the “God filter”’, International Journal of Philosophy of Religion, 72, 177–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Mark C. (2017) God's Own Ethics: Norms of Divine Agency and the Argument from Evil (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 148–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pruss, Alexander R. (2011) ‘From love to union as one body’, in Watt, Helen (ed.) Fertility and Gender: Issues in Reproductive and Sexual Ethics (Oxford: Anscombe Bioethics Center), 17–27.Google Scholar
Van Til, Cornelius (1974) Introduction to Systematic Theology, 2nd edn, Edgar, William (ed.) (Phillipsburg NJ: Presbyterian & Reformed).Google Scholar
White, Heath (2020) Fate and Free Will: A Defense of Theological Determinism (South Bend IN: Notre Dame University Press).Google Scholar
Wolterstorff, Nicholas (1995) Divine Discourse: Philosophical Reflections on the Claim that God Speaks (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar