Article contents
The logic of hope: a defence of the hopeful
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 February 2017
Abstract
This article explicates and defends the attitude of hope as a distinctive religious attitude that cuts across the standard trichotomy of atheism, agnosticism and theism.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017
References
Boulton, D. (2006) Godless for God's Sake, 1st edn (Hobson's Farm, Dent, Cumbria: Dales Historical Monographs).Google Scholar
Cresson, O. (2014) Quaker and Naturalist Too, 1st edn (Iowa City: Morning Walk Press).Google Scholar
Durham, G. (2013) Being a Quaker: A Guide for Newcomers, Kindle edition (London: Quaker Quest).Google Scholar
Jordan, J. (2016) ‘A problem with theistic hope’, Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion, VII (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
McKaughan, D. J. (2013) ‘Authentic faith and acknowledged risk: dissolving the problem of faith and reason’, Religious Studies, 49, 10–24.Google Scholar
McKaughan, D. J. (2016) ‘Action-centered faith, doubt, and rationality’, Journal of Philosophical Research, 41, Issue Supplement: Selected Papers in Honor of William P. Alston, 71–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muyskens, J. (1979) The Sufficiency of Hope: The Conceptual Foundations of Religion (Philadelphia: Temple University Press).Google Scholar
Poston, T. (2009) ‘Review: Believing by Faith: An Essay in the Epistemology of Ethics and Religious Belief, by John Bishop’, Mind, 118, 15–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sessions, W. L. (1994) The Concept of Faith: A Philosophical Investigation (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Snyder, C. R. (ed.) (2000) Handbook of Hope: Theory, Measures, and Applications (London: Academic Press).Google Scholar
- 3
- Cited by