Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-pfhbr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T09:24:49.493Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On Not Confusing Necessity with Compulsion: a Reply to Paul Helm

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

Vincent Brümmer
Vincent Brümmer
Affiliation:
Faculty of Theology, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 80105, 3508 TC Utrecht, The Netherlands
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This paper responds to Helm's rebuttal of Brummer's account of Bernard and Calvin in Religious Studies 30, 4. It contends that Helm confuses indeterminism with nondeterminism and that a clear distinction between freedom from necessity and freedom from compulsion must be drawn. Contra Helm, there is still a contradiction between Calvin's defence of freedom from compulsion and his account of the perseverance of God's grace.

Type
Research Article
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 31 , Issue 1 , March 1995 , pp. 105 - 109
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Sutherland, , ‘Religion, ethics and action’, in Hebblethwaite, B. and Sutherland, S. R. (eds.), The Philosophical Frontiers of Christian Theology (Cambridge, 1982), 160f.Google Scholar See also chapter 7 of my What are we doing when we Pray? (London, 1964).Google Scholar