Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-4hvwz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-04T13:19:21.858Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Philo's Final Conclusion in Hume's Dialogues1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

A. G. Vink
A. G. Vink
Affiliation:
Lelystad, The Netherlands
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

‘Truly this is the sweetest of theologies’, William said, with perfect humility, and I thought he was using that insidious figure of thought that rhetors call irony, which must always be prefaced by the pronunciatio, representing its signal and its justification – something William never did. For which reason the abbot, more inclined to the use of figures of speech, took William literally…

Type
Articles
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 25 , Issue 4 , December 1989 , pp. 489 - 499
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Echelbarger, Charles. ‘Hume's Tacit Atheism’, Religious Studies, xi (1975), 19–35.Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto. Il nome della Rosa (Milano, 1980). English translation, The Name of the Rose (London, 1984).Google Scholar
Gaskin, J. C. A. ‘Hume's Critique of Religion’, Journal of the History of Philosphy, xiv (1976), 301–11.Google Scholar
Gaskin, J. C. A.Hume's Philosophy of Religion (London, 1978).Google Scholar
Gaskin, J. C. A. ‘Hume's Attenuated Deism’, Archivfür Geschichte der Philosophie, LXV (1983), 160–73.Google Scholar
Gawlick, Günther (ed.). David Hume. Dialoge über natürliche Religion (Hamburg, 1980).Google Scholar
Grave, S. A. ‘Hume's Criticism of the Argument from Design’, Revue Internationale de Philosophie, xxx (1976), 64–78.Google Scholar
Kemp Smith, Norman (ed.). David Hume, Dialogues concerning Natural Religion (Indianapolis, 1947 (1 1935)).Google Scholar
Penelhum, Terence. ‘Hume's Skepticism and the Dialogues’, in: McGill Hume Studies, Ed. Norton, D. F./Capaldi, N./Robison, W. L. (San Diego, 1979), pp 253–78.Google Scholar
Pike, Nelson (ed.). Hume: Dialogues concerning Natural Religion (Indianapolis, 1970).Google Scholar
Popkin, Richard H. (ed.). David Hume, Dialogues concerning Natural Religion and the Posthumous Essay (Indianapolis, 1980).Google Scholar
Prado, C. G. ‘Hume and the God-Hypothesis’, Hume Studies, vii (1981), 154–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tweyman, Stanley. ‘An ‘ Inconvenience ’ of Anthropomorphism’, Hume Studies, viii (1982), 19–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tweyman, Stanley. Scepticism and Belief in Hume's Dialogues concerning Natural Religion (Dordrecht, 1986).Google Scholar