Last updated 10th July 2024: Online ordering is currently unavailable due to technical issues. We apologise for any delays responding to customers while we resolve this. For further updates please visit our website https://www.cambridge.org/news-and-insights/technical-incident
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 October 2008
The late Karl Barth once wrote that no one can hope to overcome Ludwig Feuerbach ‘…with whining or with angry criticism of his views of religion.’ This is plainly correct, for Feuerbach's argument that religious language is always anthropological is an argument of great attractiveness—and, apparently, of great explanatory utility to psychologists, historians, and philosophers. Barth's solution to the problem raised by Feuerbach is less satisfactory. It just will not do for Christian believers simply to cleanse Christian theology of anthropological foundations by admitting ‘…that even in our relation to God,… we can lay claim to his truth, his certainty, his salvation as grace and only as grace’. Nor will it do for Christian believers, secure in the promise of divine succour, to ‘… laugh… at Feuerbach’ for his naive view of human possibilities. Even though a cleansing of theology may be helpful to the Church, it will have little (more likely, no) effect upon the widespread popular and scholarly acceptance of Feuerbach's conclusions.
page 457 note 1 Karl Barth, ‘An Introductory Essay’ (from Die Theologie und die Kirche [Zollikon-Zürich: Evangelischer Verlag A.G., 1928]), trans. James Luther Adams, reprinted in Ludwig, Feuerbach, The Essence of Christianity, trans. George, Eliot, Torchbook edition (New York: Harper & Brothers, Publishers 1957,) p. xxviii.Google Scholar
page 457 note 2 Barth, ‘An Introductory Essay’, ibid., p. xxix.
page 457 note 3 Barth, ‘An Introductory Essay’, ibid., p. xxviii.
page 458 note 1 Feuerbach, Essence, p. 2.
page 458 note 2 ibid., p. 2.
page 458 note 3 ibid., p. 4.
page 458 note 4 ibid., p. 5.
page 458 note 5 ibid., p. 12.
page 458 note 6 ibid., p. 12.
page 458 note 7 ibid., p. 16.
page 458 note 8 ibid., p. 14.
page 459 note 1 , Feuerbach, Essence, pp. 12–32.Google Scholar
page 460 note 1 , Feuerbach, Essence, chaps. 3–6.Google Scholar
page 460 note 2 Karl, Marx, ‘Theses on Feuerbach’, The Marx-Engels Reader, ed. Tucker, Robert C. (New York, W. W. Norton & Company, Inc., 1972), pp. 107–109Google Scholar, thesis 4.
page 460 note 3 Marx, ‘Theses on Feuerbach’, ibid., thesis 6
page 460 note 4 Marx, ‘Theses on Feuerbach’, ibid., theses 6, 8.
page 460 note 5 Cf., e.g., Friedrich, Schleiermacher, The Christian Faith, trans. (from the second edition) and ed. MacKintosh, H. R. and Stewart, J. S., Torchbook edition, (New York, Harper & Row, Publishers, 1963), 2 vols.: vol. I, pp. 62–68Google Scholar; vol. II, pp. 377–424; Immanuel, Kant, Religion within the Limits of Reason Alone, trans. Greene, Theodore M. and Hudson, Hoyt H., Torchbook edition (New York, Harper & Brothers, 1960), pp. 59–60.Google Scholar
page 461 note 1 Feuerbach, , Essence, p. 45.Google Scholar
page 461 note 2 ibid., p. 59.
page 461 note 3 ibid., p. 63.
