Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-89wxm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-05T15:59:35.391Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Significance of Process Theology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

Illtyd Trethowan
Affiliation:
Monk of Downside Abbey

Extract

Process theology is far less prominent in Britain than in its country of origin, but its central doctrine of a developing God would prove, I think, to be held by many British theologians if one made enquiry. Professor Keith Ward may show which way the wind is blowing when he writes in his recent book Rational Theology and the Creativity of God: ‘only if God is temporal, can he be the free creator of a universe of free creatures; only if he is eternal, can he possess that necessity which is the foundation of the world; only if he is dipolar, can he be both’. To that extent he accepts the Whitehead-Hartshorne position. Why has the the absolute timelessness of God seemed obvious so regularly to thinking religious people down the ages? It must be, I shall say, that they have felt themselves in touch somehow with another world, or rather another state, in which time is absolutely transcended. But I am not concerned only with that in this article. My business is to suggest that process theology is important for a number of reasons. I shall return to Ward's book at the end.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 311 note 1 (Basil Blackwell, 1982), p. 230.

page 311 note 2 Vol. 18, no. 2.

page 313 note 1 Published in the U.S.A. by Westminster Press (1976) and in the U.K. by Christian Journals Limited, Belfast (1977).

page 314 note 1 P. 26.

page 314 note 2 Pp. 44–5.

page 315 note 1 P. 46.

page 315 note 2 Pp. 47–8.

page 316 note 1 St Thomas and the Problem of Evil (Marquette University Press, Milwaukee).Google Scholar

page 316 note 2 In Cahier XXIV of Nouvelle Journée.

page 317 note 1 P. 124.

page 317 note 2 July 1982.

page 317 note 3 Cobb and Griffin, op. cit. p. 65.Google Scholar

page 317 note 4 P. 31.

page 317 note 5 P. 34.

page 317 note 6 P. 36.

page 317 note 7 Science and the Modern World. p. 234.Google Scholar

page 318 note 1 Aquinas to Whitehead – Seven Centuries of Metaphysics of Religion, the Aquinas Lecture, 1976 (Marquette University Press, Milwaukee), p. 19.Google Scholar

page 318 note 2 An Essay in Christian Philosophy (Longman, 1954), p. 93. Here I consider St Thomas's attempt to justify his position.Google Scholar

page 319 note 1 Hartshorne, , op. cit. p. 11.Google Scholar

page 319 note 2 Op. cit. p. 13.Google Scholar

page 319 note 3 The Marriage of East and West (Collins, 1982), p. 178.Google Scholar

page 320 note 1 Religion (O.U.P. and Collins, Fontana), p. 98.Google Scholar

page 320 note 2 P. 141.

page 320 note 3 Rational Theology and the Creativity of God, p. 229.Google Scholar

page 320 note 4 P. 231.

page 320 note 5 P. 73.

page 320 note 6 P. 3.

page 321 note 1 P. 154.

page 321 note 2 P. 217.

page 321 note 3 P. 163.

page 321 note 4 P. 160.

page 322 note 1 P. 199.

page 322 note 2 P. 86.

page 322 note 3 See Bouyer, L., Le Consolateur (Les Editions du Cerf, Paris, 1980), p. 268.Google Scholar

page 322 note 4 Further information can be found in Lane, Dermot A., The Experience of God-An Invitation to do Theology (Paulist Press, New York and Veritas Publications, Dublin).Google Scholar