Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m42fx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T18:33:55.141Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Trinity, simplicity, and contradictory theology: a theologian's reflections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2024

Thomas H. McCall*
Affiliation:
Asbury Theological Seminary, Wilmore, KY, USA

Abstract

I explore the promise of Beall's proposal for a long-standing challenge for traditional theology. I first offer a sketch of the problem and a brief overview of some of the more common responses to it. I then show how Beall's proposal holds initial promise; following this I highlight some concerns and raise some questions.

Type
Book Symposium
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ayres, L (2004) Nicaea and its Legacy: An Approach to Fourth-Century Trinitarian Theology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beall, Jc (2023) Divine Contradiction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beall, Jc and Logan, SA (2017) Logic: The Basics. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradshaw, D (2019) Essence and energies: what kind of distinction? Analogia 6, 535.Google Scholar
Cross, R (2022) Christology and Metaphysics in the Seventeenth Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gracia, JJE (1994) Introduction: the problem of individuation. In Gracia, JJE (ed.), Individuation in Scholasticism: The Later Middle Ages and the Counter-Reformation, 1150–1650. Albany: State University of New York Press, pp. 120.Google Scholar
Marschler, T (2016) Substantiality and personality in the scholastic doctrine of God. In Schartl, T, Tapp, C and Wegner, V (eds), Rethinking the Concept of a Personal God: Classical Theism, Theistic Personalism, and Alternative Concepts of God. Münster: Aschendorff Verlag, pp. 79106.Google Scholar
McCall, T (2012) Forsaken: The Trinity and the Cross, and Why it Matters. Downers Grove: InterVarsity Academic.Google Scholar
McCall, T (2014) Trinity doctrine plain and simple. In Crisp, OD and Sanders, F (eds), Advancing Trinitarian Theology. Grand Rapids: Zondervan Academic, pp. 4259.Google Scholar
McCall, T (2021) Analytic Christology and the Theological Interpretation of the New Testament. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montoya, DRD (1625) Commentaria as Disputationes im primano partem Santi Thomas, De Trinitate. n.p.Google Scholar
Page, M (2021) Detachment issues: a dilemma for Beall's contradictory Christology. Journal of Analytic Theology 9, 201204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, T (1990) True contradictions. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 20, 335354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reese, P-N (2023) Contradictory Christology: a conciliar concern. Asian Journal of Philosophy 2, 314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Restall, G (2015) Assertion, denial, accepting, rejecting, symmetry, and paradox. In Caert, CR and Hjortland, OT (eds), Foundations of Logical Consequence. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 310321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stump, E (2003) Aquinas. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Suarez, F (1947) On the Various Kinds of Distinctions. Vollert, C SJ (trans.). Milwaukee: Marquette University Press.Google Scholar
Turretin, F (1992) Institutes of Elenctic Theology. Giger, GM (trans.), Dennison, JT Jr (ed.), vol. 1. Philipsburg: P & R Publishing.Google Scholar
Vidu, A (2021) The Same God Who Works All Things: Inseparable Operations in Trinitarian Theology. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar