Article contents
Good, God, and the open-question argument
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 August 2005
Abstract
In Finite and Infinite Goods, Robert Adams defends his metaphysical account that good is resemblance to God via an ‘open-question’ intuition. It is, however, unclear what this intuition amounts to. I give two possible readings: one based on the semantic framework Adams employs, and another based on Adams's account of humankind's epistemological limitations. I argue that neither of these readings achieves Adams's advertised aim.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- © 2005 Cambridge University Press
- 2
- Cited by