Our systems are now restored following recent technical disruption, and we’re working hard to catch up on publishing. We apologise for the inconvenience caused. Find out more: https://www.cambridge.org/universitypress/about-us/news-and-blogs/cambridge-university-press-publishing-update-following-technical-disruption
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 October 2008
Recently there have been a number of attempts at showing that God's attributes are conceptually defective (Kretzman, Mackie). Foremost among the attributes singled out for criticism is omnipotence. But critics have also questioned the logical compatibility of omniscience and immutability and also omnipotence and omniscience.
page 355 note 1 ‘Divine Perfection’, Religious Studies, XXI 2 (1985), 144–58.Google Scholar
page 355 note 2 Ibid. p. 147.
page 356 note 1 Ibid. p. 156.
page 356 note 2 Ibid. p. 156.
page 356 note 3 Ibid. p. 156.
page 357 note 1 Ibid. pp. 157–8.
page 357 note 2 Ibid. p. 158.
page 357 note 3 Ibid. p. 147.
page 358 note 1 Ibid. p. 158.
page 362 note 1 Swinburne, R. G., ‘Duty and the Will of God’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, IV, 2 (12. 1974), 213–27;CrossRefGoogle Scholar reprinted in Divine Commands and Morality, edited by Helm, Paul (Oxford University Press, 1981), p. 121.Google Scholar
