22 August 2024: Due to technical disruption, we are experiencing some delays to publication. We are working to restore services and apologise for the inconvenience. For further updates please visit our website: https://www.cambridge.org/universitypress/about-us/news-and-blogs/cambridge-university-press-publishing-update-following-technical-disruption
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 October 2008
In this short paper, I want to say one thing about the problem of communicating religious understanding. But first it might be helpful to locate the problem in current thinking on religious education.
page 253 note 1 Logos and Praxis (Spring, 1979).Google Scholar
page 254 note 1 Hirst, P. H., ‘Liberal education and the nature of knowledge’, British journal of Educational Studies (November 1965).Google Scholar
page 254 note 2 See especially Peters, R. S., Ethics and Education (London: Allen and Unwin).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
page 254 note 3 White, J. P., Towards a Compulsory Curriculum (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1973).Google Scholar
page 255 note 1 Op. cit. p. 44.Google Scholar
page 256 note 1 Anscombe, G. E. M., On Transubstantiation (London: Catholic Truth Society).Google Scholar
page 257 note 1 Kant's Works, ed. Verlander, K. (Felix Meiner, 1794)Google Scholar (letter trs. Rush Rhees).
page 258 note 1 I owe this example to Rush Rhees.
