Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T17:00:18.891Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Moving the Monarch: The Rhetoric of Persuasion in Camões's Lusíadas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

John De Oliveira E Silva
John De Oliveira E Silva*
Affiliation:
City University of New York, Laguardia College
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Like many other medieval and Renaissance works, the Lusíadas by Luis de Camões can be profitably interpreted as a work of rhetorical persuasion. Although rhetoric was a primary feature of the educational curriculum of the time, this line of reasoning has been missing from the critical studies of the poem, most of which are committed instead to historical, biographical, and ideological approaches. In each narrative surface of the Lusíadas, a royal audience is cajoled, admonished, guided, or taught by an eloquent petitioner who may lack the credentials of power but manifestly possesses those of experience, wisdom, virtue, and love. Finally, this petitioner, whether in the form of a historical or mythological personage, Vasco da Gama the protagonist, or some projection of the inspired poet-orator, accesses a wide range of rhetorical strategies, among them the popular and efficacious Aristotelian categories of ethos, pathos, and logos, in order more effectively to move and persuade.

Type
Studies
Information
Renaissance Quarterly , Volume 53 , Issue 3 , Autumn 2000 , pp. 735 - 768
Copyright
Copyright © Renaissance Society of America 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbot, Don. 1983. “La Retórica y el Renacimiento: An Overview of Spanish Theory.” In Murphy, 95–104.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . 1954. Rhetoric. Trans. Rhys Roberts, W.. New York.Google Scholar
Barkan, Leonard. 1980. “Diana and Actaeon: The Myth as Synthesis.” English Literary Renaissance 10: 317-59.Google Scholar
Bell, Aubrey. 1923. Luisde Camões. Oxford.Google Scholar
Bowra, C. M. 1945. From Virgil to Milton. London.Google Scholar
Camoes, Luísde. 1776, 1778. The Lusiad: or the Discovery of India, from Camoens. Trans. Mickle, William Julius. 2 vols. Oxford.Google Scholar
Camoes, Luísde. 1946-1947. Obras completas. Ed. Cidade, Hernani. 5 vols. Lisbon.Google Scholar
Camoes, Luísde. 1950. The Lusiads of Luiz de Camões. Trans. Bacon, Leonard. New York.Google Scholar
Camoes, Luísde. 1963. “The Lusiads,” in Richard Fanshawe's Translation. Ed. Bullough, Geoffrey. Carbondale, IL.Google Scholar
Camoes, Luísde. 1972. Lusladas de Luis de Camões. Ed. Manuel de Faria e Sousa. 2 vols. 1632. Reprint, Lisbon.Google Scholar
Camoes, Luísde. 1973. Luis de Camões: Os Lusladas. Ed. Pierce, Frank. Oxford.Google Scholar
Cicero, . 1996. De Oratore, Books 1-2. Trans. Sutton, E. W. Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Couto, Diogo do. 1947. Décadas. Ed. Baião, António. 2 vols. Lisbon.Google Scholar
Couto, Diogo do. 1954. O soldado prático portugues. Ed. Rodriguez Lapa, M.. Lisbon.Google Scholar
Cunha, Maria Helena Ribeiro da. 1980. Lirismo e epopéia em Luís de Camões. São Paulo.Google Scholar
Danvila, Alfonso. 1954. Felipe IIy El Rey Don Sebastián de Portugal. Madrid.Google Scholar
Dias, José Sebastião da Silva. 1985. “Camões perante o Portugal do seu tempo.” In Hower, 135-54.Google Scholar
Dyck, Joachim. 1983. “The First German Treatise on Homiletics: Erasmus Sarcer's Pastorale and Classical Rhetoric.“ In Murphy, 221-37.Google Scholar
Fernándes, Rogério. 1980. “Os Lusíadas e a educação do príncipe.” Vértice 40: 375-99, 436-39.Google Scholar
Fothergill-Payne, Peter. 1985. “A Prince of our Disorder: ‘Good Kingship’ in Camões, Couto, and Manuel de Melo.” In Hower, 12–21.Google Scholar
Garcia, José Martins. 1985. “A contradição fundamental de Os Lusíadas.” In Camoniana California: Commemorating the Quadricentennial of the Death of Luís Vaz de Camões, ed. de Lourdes Belchior, Maria, 13–19. Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
Giamatti, A. Bartlett. 1966. The Earthly Paradise and the Renaissance Epic. Princeton.Google Scholar
Gordon, Alex L. 1983. “The Place and Function of Style in Renaissance Poetics.“ In Murphy, 376-84.Google Scholar
Greene, Thomas. 1963. The Descent from Heaven: A Study in Epic Continuity. New Haven.Google Scholar
Hadas, Moses. 1954. Ancilla to Classical Reading. New York.Google Scholar
Hart, Henry Hersch. 1962. Luis de Camoens and the Epic of the Lusiads. Norman, OK.Google Scholar
Hart, Thomas R. 1976. “The Author's Voice in The Lusiads.” Hispanic Review 44: 45–55.Google Scholar
Hower, Alfred, and Preto-Rodas, Richard A.. 1985. Empire in Transition: The Portuguese World in the Time of Camoes. Gainsville, FL.Google Scholar
Lucan, . 1962. The Civil War. Trans. Duff, J. D.. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Kennedy, William J. 1978. Rhetorical Norms in Renaissance Literature. New Haven.Google Scholar
Lausberg, Heinrich. 1993. Elementos de Retdrica Literdria. Trans. Rosado Fernandes, R. M.. Lisbon.Google Scholar
Livermore, H. V. 1969. A New History of Portugal. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Macedo, Helder. 15 November, 1983. “The Purpose of Praise: Past and Future in The Lusiads of Luis de Camoes.” Inaugural Lecture in the Camoens Chair of Portuguese, King's College. London.Google Scholar
Martinez Martinez, Manuel. 1980. “La dedicatoria de Os Lusiadas.” In Homenaje a Camoens: Estudios y ensayos hispano-portugueses, ed. Tapia, Nicolds Extramera and Fernandez, Manuel Correia, 247-57. Granada.Google Scholar
Melville, Herman. 1979. White Jacket, or the World in a Man-of-War. New York.Google Scholar
Moser, Gerald M. 1985. “Grumbling Veterans of an Empire.” In Hower, 97–105.Google Scholar
Murphy, James J. 1983. Renaissance Eloquence: Studies in the Theory and Practice of Renaissance Rhetoric. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Pierce, Frank. 1954. “The Place of Mythology in the Lusiads.” Comparative Literature 6.2: 97–122.Google Scholar
Post, H. Houwens. 1972. “A cronologia da composição de várias passagens de Os Lusiadas.” Ocidente 83: 293–316.Google Scholar
Puttenham, George. 1970. The Arte of English Poesie. Ed. Hathaway, Baxter. Kent State, OH.Google Scholar
Rauh, Sister Miriam Joseph. 1957. Shakespeare's Use of the Arts of Language. New York.Google Scholar
Reali, Erilde Melillo. 1980. “Camões e Dom Sebastião.” Brotéria 111: 69–76.Google Scholar
Saraiva, António José 1949. Luis de Camões. Lisbon.Google Scholar
Saraiva, António José, and Lopes, Óscar. 1957. Histdria da literaturaportuguesa. Porto.Google Scholar
Saraiva, José Hermano. 1978. Vida ignorada de Camoes. Mira-Sintra.Google Scholar
Sena, Jorge de. 1973. “Aspectos do pensamento de Camões através a esrrutura lingufstica de Os Lusiadas.” In Actas da I Reunião Internacional de Camonistas, 50–57. Lisbon.Google Scholar
Sérgio, Antonio. 1977. “Camões Panfletário: Camões e Dom Sebastião.” In Em torno das ideias politicas de Camões, 31–63. Lisbon.Google Scholar
Sidney, Sir Philip. 1970. An Apology for Poetry. Ed. Robinson, Forrest G.. Indianapolis.Google Scholar
Silva, Vitor de Aguiare. 1972. O significado do episddio da Ilha dos Amores na estrutura de “Os Lusiadas. “ Lisbon.Google Scholar
Tillyard, E. M. W. 1954. The English Epic and Its Background. New York.Google Scholar
Trevor-Roper, Hugh. 1974. Princes and Artists: Patronage and Ideology at Four Hapsburg Courts, 1517-1633. New York.Google Scholar
Trinkaus, Charles. 1983. “The Question of Truth in Renaissance Rhetoric and Anthropology.” In Murphy, 207-20.Google Scholar
Velloso, J. M. Queirós. 1945. D. Sebastião, 1554-78. Lisbon.Google Scholar
Vickers, Brian. 1983a. “Epideictic and Epic in the Renaissance.” New Literary History 14.3: 497–537.Google Scholar
Vickers, Brian. 1983b. “'The Power of Persuasion': Images of the Orator, Elyot to Shakespeare.” In Murphy, 411-35.Google Scholar
Ward, John O. 1983. “Renaissance Commentators on Ciceronian Rhetoric.“ In Murphy, 126-73.Google Scholar