Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-q6k6v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T20:26:09.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Elizabethan Prose Fiction and Some Trends in Recent Criticism*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

A. C. Hamilton
A. C. Hamilton*
Affiliation:
Queen's University, Kingston
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Current methodological trends now influence the study of most literature, but as I shall argue, in the future they may alter radically the study of Elizabethan prose fiction. Some works of literature, especially the major ones, may be enjoyed by readers in any age, but many, perhaps now most, depend on literary criticism to be properly understood and fully appreciated. At one time Milton's Paradise Lost was a popular work, requiring of its readers only that their lives be grounded in the Bible to ensure their full response to it. For most readers today, an adequate response to Milton's poem is a product of the historical scholarship and the New Criticism practiced mostly in America in the first half of the twentieth century.

Type
Research Article
Information
Renaissance Quarterly , Volume 37 , Issue 1 , Spring 1984 , pp. 21 - 33
Copyright
Copyright © Renaissance Society of America 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

An earlier version of this paper was presented at the meetings of the South Central Renaissance Conference and the Renaissance Society of America in Memphis, Tennessee on March 26, 1983, as part of its panel on “Current Methodological Trends in Renaissance Studies.“ I acknowledge gratefully the financial assistance given me by the School of Graduate Studies and Research at The Queen's University, Kingston towards the expense of my trip to the Conference.

References

1 Sterg, O'Dell, A Chronological List of Prose Fiction in English Printed in England and Other Countries, 1475-1640 (Cambridge, Mass. 1954).Google Scholar

2 John, Buxton, Elizabethan Taste (London, 1963), p. 246.Google Scholar

3 Noted by Richard S., M. Hirsch in the Introduction to his edition of Richard, Johnson, The Most Pleasant History of Tom a Lincolne(Columbia, S.C. 1978) pp. xix-xx.Google Scholar

4 Roger, Ascham, The Schoolmaster (1570), ed. Lawrence V., Ryan (Ithaca, 1967), pp. 68-9.Google Scholar

5 Sir Philip, Sidney, The Countess of Pembroke's Arcadia (The Old Arcadia), ed. Jean, Robertson (Oxford, 1973), p. xliii. Sidney's Works, ed. Albert, Feuillerat (Cambridge, 1923), III, 130.Google Scholar

6 Sir Fulke, Greville, Life of Sir Philip Sidney (1652), ed. Nowell, Smith (Oxford, 1907), p. 11.Google Scholar

7 John, Carey, “Sixteenth and Seventeenth Century Prose,” in English Poetry and Prose, 1540-1674, ed. Christopher, Ricks (London, 1970), p. 361 Google Scholar. As usual with such pronouncements, the death has been greatly exaggerated. See, for example, Walter R., Davis, Idea and Act in Elizabethan Fiction (Princeton, 1969)Google Scholar; Margaret, Spufford, Small Books and Pleasant Histories: Popular Fiction and its Readership in Seventeenth-Century England (London, 1981)Google Scholar, and James L., Harner, English Renaissance Prose Fiction, 1500- 1660, An Annotated Bibliography of Criticism (Boston, 1978).Google Scholar

8 “Elizabethan Romance: the Example of Prose Fiction,” ELH, 49 (1982), p. 290.

9 I cite, in modern spelling, from the 1587 edition reprinted in the Everyman Edition, Shorter Novels, Elizabethan and Jacobean, vol. 1.

10 Northrop, Frye, The Secular Scripture: A Study of the Structure of Romance (Cambridge, Mass. 1976) p. 80.Google Scholar

11 I cite, in modern spelling, from Feuillerat's edition, Sidney's Works, 1, 90.

12 Frye, The Secular Scripture, pp. 85-86.

13 English Literature in the Sixteenth Century (Oxford, 1954), p. 335.

14 Education and the University (London, 1943), cited from the Cambridge 1979 edition, p. 38.

15 ” ‘Bring forth a wonder': Presentation in Shakespeare's Romances,” Texas Studies in Literature and Language, 21 (1979), p. 455.

16 Penguin Edition, 1977, p. 20.

17 Beyond Genre: New Directions in Literary Classification (Ithaca, 1972) p. 184. See Alastair, Fowler, Kinds of Literature: An Introduction to the Theory of Genres and Modes (Cambridge, Mass., 1982).Google Scholar

18 “Structuralism and Literature,” in Contemporary Approaches to English Studies, ed. Hilda Schiff (London, 1977), p. 64.