Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-03T09:22:41.458Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Adding value in the organic sector: Characteristics of organic producer–handlers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2008

Lydia Oberholtzer*
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602-7509, USA.
Carolyn Dimitri
Affiliation:
United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Washington, DC 20036, USA.
Catherine Greene
Affiliation:
United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Washington, DC 20036, USA.
*
*Corresponding author: loberholtzer@ers.usda.gov

Abstract

Sales of organic food have soared over the past decade. Although nearly all organic commodities pass through the hands of at least one intermediary on the way from the farmer to the consumer, there is a dearth of literature examining organic food marketing, especially for the middle section of the supply chain. This paper uses new survey data on organic intermediaries (organic handlers) to characterize firms that are certified to both handle and produce organic foods, or organic producer–handlers. Because of their direct link to the production level, the producer–handler has the potential to provide insight into value-added activities in the organic sector. A logistic regression is estimated in order to identify characteristics that make it more likely that a firm would be both a certified organic handler and a certified organic producer, while survey results are also used to describe some of the main challenges these producer–handlers face in handling their products. Organic producer–handlers ranked problems with ingredient procurement and supply and international trade issues as the highest barriers to growth. The model indicated that with few exceptions, many of the operational and procurement characteristics of organic producer–handlers are comparable to the entire organic handling population. However, those facilities dedicated solely to organic handling and those certified longer are more likely to be organic producer–handlers. Use of direct markets by organic handlers has the most robust relationship in the model, although marketing to natural products independent retailers and wholesalers are also important.

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Organic Trade Association (OTA). 2006. The Organic Trade Association's 2006 manufacturers' survey. Nutrition Business Journal, Greenfield, MA.Google Scholar
2 Nutrition Business Journal (NBJ). 2007. US Organic Food Sales ($Mil) 1997–2010e – Chart 22. Penton Media, Inc., New York, NY.Google Scholar
3 Pirog, R. (ed.). 2007. Ecolabel Value Assessment: Consumer and Food Business Perceptions of Local Foods. Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture and Iowa State University Business Analysis Laboratory, Ames, IA.Google Scholar
4 Halweil, B. 2002. Home Grown: The Case for Local Food In A Global Market. Worldwatch Paper No. 163, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
5 Kremen, A., Greene, C., and Hanson, J. 2004. Organic produce, price premiums, and eco-labeling in US farmers markets. VGS-301-01. US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, April. Available at Web site http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/VGS/Apr04/vgs30101/vgs30101.pdfGoogle Scholar
6 Walz, E. 2004. Final results of the fourth national organic farmers' survey: Sustaining organic farms in a changing organic marketplace. Organic Farming Research Foundation. Available at web site http://www.ofrf.org/publications/survey/index.html/Google Scholar
7 Dimitri, C. and Richman, N. 2000. Organic food markets in transition. Policy Studies Report No. 14. Henry A. Wallace Center for Agricultural and Environmental Policy.Google Scholar
8 US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service (USDA, ERS). 2007. Organic agricultural production in 2005. Available at web site http://www.ers.usda.gov/data/organic/Google Scholar
9 Austin, J. and Chase, R. 2004. 2002 Survey of certified organic agriculture in Florida. Florida Certified Organic Growers and Consumers Inc. Available at web site http://www.foginfo.org/docs/2002SurveyofCertifiedOrganicAgricultureinFloridaBody.docGoogle Scholar
10 Bingen, J., Osborne, C., and Reardon, E. 2007. Organic agriculture in Michigan: 2006 survey report. Michigan Organic Food and Farm Alliance.Google Scholar
11 Dillman, D. 1999. Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
12 US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service (USDA, ERS). 2005. 2004 Nationwide survey of organic manufacturers, processors, and distributors. Unpublished data.Google Scholar
13 Organic Trade Association (OTA). 2004. The Organic Trade Association's 2004 manufacturers' survey. Nutrition Business Journal, Greenfield, MA.Google Scholar
14 Hanson, J., Dismukes, R., Chambers, W., Greene, C., and Kremen, A. 2004. Risk and risk management in organic agriculture: views of organic farmers. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 19(4):218227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar