Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T03:34:31.520Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Beyond the metropolis? Popular peace and post-conflict peacebuilding

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 May 2011

DAVID ROBERTS
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The debate on peacebuilding is deadlocked. Leading scholars of ‘fourth generation’ peacebuilding, who take Liberalism to task for creating what they refer to as crises in peacebuilding, have themselves been challenged by those they criticise for over-stating Liberal failure and failing themselves to produce the goods in terms of an alternative. But behind this debate, it seems that both approaches are asking the same question: how can stable, legitimate, sustainable peace be engineered? This article engages critical theory with problem-solving social sciences. It proposes that the crises in orthodox post-conflict peacebuilding are genuine, but there are approaches that might put flesh on fourth generation concepts without bringing the Liberal edifice down, shifting the debate away from ontology and ideology and returning it to the people in whose name it is held.

Type
Research Article
Information
Review of International Studies , Volume 37 , Issue 5 , December 2011 , pp. 2535 - 2556
Copyright
Copyright © British International Studies Association 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The uncompromising nature of global governance and the dominant variants of peacebuilding, privileging the growth of markets above care for human life, makes it impossible for me to consider it as Liberal, since Liberalism was once associated with individual rights harnessed to social responsibility. The latter is in declining evidence. Because of this, I find it easier, and less inaccurate, to use the term ‘neoliberal’.

2 Paris, Roland, ‘Saving Liberal Peacebuilding’, Review of International Studies, 36 (2010), pp 337–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; Call, Charles and Cook, Susan, ‘On Democratization and Peacebuilding’, Global Governance, 9 (2003), pp. 233–246Google Scholar ; Chesterman, Simon, Ignatieff, Michael and Thakur, Ramesh, Making States Work: State Failure and the Crisis of Governance (New York: UN University, 2005)Google Scholar .

3 Richmond, Oliver, Peace in International Relations (London, Routledge, 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

4 Krause, Keith and Jutersonke, Oliver, ‘Peace, Security and Development in Postconflict Environments’, Security Dialogue, 36:4 (2005), p. 449CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

5 Carothers, Thomas, ‘The End of the Transition Paradigm’, Journal of Democracy, 13:1 (2002), pp. 5–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

6 Zakaria, Fareed, ‘The Rise of Illiberal Democracy’, Foreign Affairs (November/December 1997), pp. 22–43Google Scholar .

7 Ottaway, Marina, ‘Rebuilding State Institutions in Collapsed States’, Development and Change, 33:5 (2002), pp. 1001–1023CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

8 Chandler, David, Bosnia: Faking Democracy After Dayton (London: Pluto, 1999)Google Scholar ; Sorenson, Jens, ‘Balkanism and the New Radical Interventionism: a Structural Critique’, International Peacekeeping, 9:1 (2002), pp. 1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

9 Lizee, Pierre, Peace, Power and Resistance in Cambodia: Global Governance and the Failure of International Conflict Resolution (London: Macmillan, 2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; Heder, Stephen, ‘Cambodia's Democratic Transition to Neoauthoritarianism’, Current History: A Journal of Contemporary World Affairs, 94:596 (1995), pp. 425–429Google Scholar .

10 McMillan, John, ‘Promoting Transparency in Angola’, Journal of Democracy, 16:3 (2005), pp. 155–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; Wilson, J. Zoe, ‘Paradoxes and Dilemmas of Institutional Change: Human Rights and Livelihoods in Rural War-torn Angola’, Journal of Peacebuilding and Development, 2:1 (2004), pp. 37–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

11 Afoaku, George, Explaining the Failure of Democracy in the Democratic Republic of Congo: Autocracy And Dissent in an Ambivalent World (Cerdigion: Edwin Mellen Press, 2005)Google Scholar .

12 Dusing, Sandra, Traditional Leadership and Democratization in Southern Africa: A comparative study of Botswana, Namibia and South Africa (Transaction Publishers: New Jersey, 2005)Google Scholar .

13 Manning, Carrie, ‘Elite Habituation to Democracy in Mozambique: The View from Parliament, 1994–2000’, Commonwealth and Comparative Politics, 40:1 (2002), pp. 61–80Google Scholar .

14 Bratton, Michael and Walle, Nicholas Van de, ‘Neopatrimonial Regimes and Political Transitions in Africa’, World Politics, 46 (1994), pp. 453–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

15 Boas, Morten, ‘Liberia and Sierra Leone – dead ringers? The Logic of Neopatrimonial Rule’, Third World Quarterly (2001), pp. 697–723Google Scholar .

16 Boas, ‘Liberia and Sierra Leone’, pp. 697–723.

17 Cammack, Diana, ‘The Logic of African Neopatrimonialism: What Role for Donors?, Development Policy Review, 25:5 (2007), pp. 599–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; Ottaway, ‘Rebuilding State Institutions’.

18 Weinstein, Jeremy, Autonomous Recovery and International Intervention in Comparative Perspective (Stanford: Stanford University Press 2005)Google Scholar ; Ottaway, ‘Rebuilding State Institutions’.

19 Snyder, Richard, ‘Explaining Transitions from Neopatrimonial Dictatorships’, Comparative Politics, 24:4 (1992), pp. 379–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

20 Dahl, Robert, Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition (New Haven: Yale University, 1971)Google Scholar .

21 Krause and Jutersonke, ‘Peace, security and development’, p. 448.

22 Richmond, Peace in International Relations; Duffield, Mark, Global Governance and the New Wars: The Merging of Development and Security (London: Zed, 2001)Google Scholar ; Chandler, David, Empire in Denial: The Politics of State-building (London: Zed, 2006)Google Scholar .

23 Richmond, , Peace in International Relations, p. 109Google Scholar .

24 Ibid., p. 131.

25 Roland Paris, ‘Saving Liberal Peacebuilding’.

26 Richmond, Oliver, ‘A post-liberal peace: Eirenism and the Everyday’, Review of International Studies, 35 (2009), pp. 557–580CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

27 Richmond, Oliver, ‘The problem of peace: understanding the ‘liberal peace’, Conflict Security and Development, 6:3 (2006), pp. 291–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

28 Donais, Timothy, ‘Empowerment or Imposition? Dilemmas of Local Ownership in Postconflict Peacebuilding Processes’, Peace and Change, 34:1 (2009), pp. 3–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; Pugh, Mike and Turner, Mandy, ‘Towards a new agenda for transforming war economies’, Conflict Security and Development, 6:3 (2006), pp. 471–479Google Scholar ; Ginty, Roger Mac, ‘Indigenous Peace-Making Versus the Liberal Peace’, Conflict and Cooperation, 43:2 (2008), pp. 139–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

29 Richmond, Oliver, ‘Patterns of Peace 1’, Global Society, 20:4 (2006), pp. 367–394, p. 370CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

30 Pemberton, Simon, ‘A Theory of Moral Indifference: Understanding the production of harm by capitalist society’, in Hillyard, Paddy et al. , Beyond Criminology: Taking Harm Seriously (London: Pluto), pp. 67–83Google Scholar ; McMichael, A.‘Prisoners of the Proximate: Loosening the constraints on epidemiology in an age of change’, Journal of Epidemiology, 149 (1999), pp. 887–897CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; Piachaud, Jack, ‘Global Health and Human Security’, Medicine, Conflict and Survival (2008), pp. 1–4Google Scholar ; Roberts, David, Global Governance and Biopolitics: Regulating Human Security (London: Zed, 2010)Google Scholar .

31 Chandler, Empire in Denial.

32 Richmond, ‘Patterns of Peace 1’.

33 Roberts, Global Governance.

34 Grayson, Kyle, ‘Human security as power/knowledge: the biopolitics of a definitional debate’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 21:3 (2008), pp. 383–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; Roberts, Global Governance.

35 Clements, Barbara, ‘Emancipation through Communism: The Ideology of AM Kollontai’, Slavic Review, 32:2 (1973), pp. 323–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; Meszaros, Istvan, The Power of Ideology (London: Zed, 2005)Google Scholar .

36 Mies, Maria, Patriarchy and Accumulation on a World Scale: Women in the International Division of Labour (London: Zed, 1999)Google Scholar ; Enloe, Cynthia, Bananas, Beaches and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics (California: University of California Press 2001)Google Scholar .

37 Fanon, Franz, Studies in a Dying Colonialism (London: Earthscan, 1989)Google Scholar ; Zinoman, Philippe, The Colonial Bastille: A History of Imprisonment in Vietnam, 1862–1940 (California: University of California Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

38 Certeau, Michel deThe Practice of Everyday Life (California: University of California Press, 1984), p. xivGoogle Scholar .

39 Boege, Volker, Brown, Anne, Clements, Kevin and Nolan, Anna, ‘On Hybrid Political Orders and Emerging States: What is Failing? States in the Global South or Research and Politics in the West?’, in Fischer, Martina and Schmelzle, Beatrix (eds), Building Peace in the Absence of States: Challenging the Discourse on State Failure (Berlin: Berghof Research Centre, 2009), p. 20Google Scholar . Despite urbanisation trends, the majority of populations in most post-conflict spaces are still rurally-located.

40 Certeau, de, The Practice of Everyday Life, p. xivGoogle Scholar .

41 Foucault, Michel, ‘Technologies of the Self: A Seminar with Michel Foucault’, in Martin, Luther, Gutman, Huck, and Hutton, Patrick (eds), Technologies of the Self (Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1998)Google Scholar .

42 Richmond, ‘A Post-Liberal Peace’, p. 571.

43 Richmond, Oliver, ‘Becoming Liberal, Unbecoming Liberalism: Liberal-Local Hybridity via the Everyday as a Response to the Paradoxes of Liberal Peacebuilding’, Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 3:3 (2009), pp. 324–344, 326CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

44 Foucault, ‘Technologies of the Self’.

45 Duffield, Global Governance and the New Wars.

46 Brahimi, Lakhdar, Statebuilding in Crisis and Postconflict Countries, 7th Global Forum on Reinventing Government (2007)Google Scholar .

47 Roberts, David, Political Transition in Cambodia 1991–1999: Power, Elitism and Democracy (London: Curzon, 2001)Google Scholar .

48 Levitt, Mathew, Hamas: Politics, Charity and Terrorism in the Service of Jihad. (Yale: Yale University Press, 2006)Google Scholar ; Robinson, Glenn E., ‘Hamas as Social Movement’, in Wiktorowicz, Quintan (ed.), Islamic activism: a social movement theory approach (Indiana: Indiana University Press, 2004)Google Scholar .

49 Hristov, Jasmin, ‘Land, Blood and Capital Accumulation: Latin America's Eternal War on the Poor’, Journal of Peacebuilding and Development, 1:3 (2004), pp. 4–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

50 Tambiah, Stanley, ‘The Galactic Polity: the Structure of Traditional Kingdoms in Southeast Asia’, in Freed, Stanley (ed.), Anthropology and the Climate of Opinion (New York: New York Academy of Sciences, 1977), pp. 69–97Google Scholar .

51 Amin, S., Imperialism and Unequal Development: Essays by Samir Amin (Sussex: The Harvester Press, 1977)Google Scholar ; Rodney, Walt, How Europe Underdeveloped Africa (London and Dar-Es-Salaam: Tanzanian Publishing House, 1973)Google Scholar ; Bratton, Michael and Walle, Nicholas van de, Democratic Experiments in Africa: Regime Transitions in Comparative Perspective (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

52 Roberts, David, ‘Post-conflict Statebuilding and State Legitimacy: From Negative to Positive Peace?’, Development and Change, 39:4 (2008), pp. 537–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

53 Boege et al., ‘On Hybrid Political Orders’, p. 30.

54 Hagman, Tobias and Hoehne, Markus, ‘Failed States or Failed Debate?’, Politorbis: Zeitschrift zur Aussenpolitik, 42 (2007), pp. 20–26, 21Google Scholar .

55 See, for example, Afoaku, Explaining the Failure of Democracy in the Democratic Republic of Congo; Boas, Liberia and Sierra Leone; Chandler, Bosnia: Faking Democracy After Dayton.

56 Author's interviews with Cambodian Second Prime Minister Hun Sen, Private Residence, Phnom Penh (1 January 1994), First Prime Minister Ung Huot, Council of Ministers, Phnom Penh (8 January 1998) and Minister of Information Khieu Kanharith, Phnom Penh, Ministry of Information (12 April 1996); Bratton and Van de Walle, Neopatrimonial Regimes and Political Transitions in Africa; Ottaway, Rebuilding State Institutions in Collapsed States.

57 Richmond, Oliver and Franks, Jason, ‘Liberal Hubris? Virtual Peace in Cambodia’, Security Dialogue, 38:1 (2007), pp. 27–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; Mehta, Harish and Mehta, Julie, Hun Sen: Strongman of Cambodia (Singapore: Graham Brash, 1999)Google Scholar ; Lizee, Peace, Power and Resistance in Cambodia.

58 Dillon, Michael and Reid, Julian, ‘Global Liberal Governance: Biopolitics, Security and War’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 30:1 (2001), pp. 41–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; Chandler, David, ‘Human Security II: waiting for the tail to wag the dog, a rejoinder to Ambrosetti, Owen and Wibben’, Security Dialogue, 39:4 (2008), pp. 463–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; Lipschutz, Ronnie, ‘Global civil society and global governmentality: or, the search for politics and state amidst the capillaries of social power’, in Barnett, Michael and Duvall, Raymond (eds), Power in Global Governance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005)Google Scholar .

59 Boege, Volker, Brown, Anne, Clements, Kevin and Nolan, Anna, ‘Undressing the Emperor: A Reply to Our Discussants’, in Fischer, and Schmelzle, , Building Peace, p. 24Google Scholar .

60 Boege et al., ‘On Hybrid Political Orders’, p. 24.

61 Liden, Kristoffer, ‘Building Peace between Global and Local Politics: The Cosmopolitical Ethics of Liberal Peacebuilding’, International Peacekeeping, 16:5 (2009), pp. 616–634, 622CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

62 Hamlin, Christopher and Sheard, Sally, ‘Revolutions in public health: 1848, and 1998’, British Medical Journal, 317 (1998), pp. 587–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

63 Richards, Paul, Indigenous Agricultural Revolution: Ecology and Food Crops in West Africa (London: Westview, 1985)Google Scholar .

64 Observations from field research exercises.

65 Lund, Christian, Twilight Institutions: Public Authority and Local Politics in Africa (Oxford, Blackwell Publishing, 2007)Google Scholar .

66 Carothers, Thomas, Confronting the Weakest Link: Aiding Political Parties in New Democracies (New York: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 2006)Google Scholar .

67 Fuller, Abigail, ‘Toward an Emancipatory Methodology for Peace Research’, Peace and Change, 17:3 (1992), pp. 286–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

68 Nagl, John A., Exum, Andrew M., Humayun, Ahmed A., A Pathway to Success in Afghanistan: The National Solidarity Program, Center for a New American Security (March 2009)Google Scholar , available at: {http://www.cnas.org/files/documents/publications/CNAS%20Policy%20Brief%20-%20Supporting%20Afghanistans%20NSP%20March%202009.pdf}; Sultan Barakat, Richard Brown, Margaret Chard, David Connolly, Mark Evans, Richard Jones and Arne Strand, ‘Mid-Term Evaluation Report of the National Solidarity Programme (NSP), Afghanistan’, Post-war Reconstruction and Development Unit, University of York/Ministry of Rural Rehabilitation and Development (May 2006), available at: {http://www.york.ac.uk/depts/poli/prdu/revival/NSP%20Evaluation%20Summary.pdf}.

69 Jhazbhay, Iqbal, Somaliland: An African Struggle for Nationhood and International Recognition, Institute for Global Dialogue & South African Institute of International Affairs, Johannesburg (2009)Google Scholar ; More, Louise Wiuff, ‘Negotiating Political Legitimacy: the Case of State Formation in Post-conflict Somaliland’, {http://cigj.anu.edu.au/cigj/link_documents/IssuesPapers/Wiuff.pdf; Mark Bradbury}, Becoming Somaliland (London: James Currey, 2008)Google Scholar .

70 Ohiorhenuan, John and Stewart, Frances, Post-Conflict Economic Recovery: Enabling Local Ingenuity (New York: UNDP, 2008)Google Scholar .

71 Water TNCs emphasise very expensive provision in metropolitan centres, and will rarely touch sanitation there. Further, they are unwilling to supply water to rural areas because the return is too limited. They will also not make bids for contracts without subsidies to pay for the bidding process. Lobina, Emmanuel and Hall, David, ‘Problems with Private Water Concessions: A Review of Experiences and Analysis of Dynamics’, International Journal of Water Resources Development, 21:1 (2005), pp. 55–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar . Spronk, Susan, ‘Water and Sanitation Utilities in the Global South: Re-centering the Debate on “Efficiency”’, Review of Radical Political Economics, 42:2 (2010), pp. 156–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; Hall, David and Lobina, Emmanuel, Water as a public service (London: Public Services International, 2006)Google Scholar .