Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-dwq4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-31T15:48:02.206Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Prime minister and foreign secretary: the dual role of James Ramsay MacDonald in 1924

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2011

CAROLYN J. KITCHING
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The career and reputation of James Ramsay MacDonald are generally influenced by his actions in 1931, and yet, as Donald Cameron Watt has stated, it is ‘not really possible to blackguard him for 1931 without having to cast aspersions on his extraordinary achievements earlier on’. This article examines some of these ‘extraordinary’ achievements by considering the role of MacDonald himself in the formation and leading of the 1924 minority Labour Government. It considers the difficulty he experienced in creating a Cabinet from colleagues whom he generally considered to be unsuitable and incapable, and which led him to become both Prime Minister and Foreign Secretary. He faced criticism from many in his party for his failure to implement a measure of socialist reforms, yet given the nature of the domestic problems with which his government was faced, and the tenuous nature of this government, held in place, as it was, by a fractured Liberal Party, this ‘failure’ is scarcely surprising. However, this article maintains that in foreign policy, and in his powerful joint role, MacDonald's reputation in 1924 really can be described as outstanding.

Type
Research Article
Information
Review of International Studies , Volume 37 , Issue 3 , July 2011 , pp. 1403 - 1422
Copyright
Copyright © British International Studies Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Iconoclast, , [Mary Agnes Hamilton], J. Ramsay MacDonald 1923–1925 (London: Leonard Parsons, 1925), p. 9.Google Scholar

2 Ibid.

3 References to the treachery of MacDonald in 1931 are legion; see, for example, Agnes Hamilton, Mary, Arthur Henderson (London: Heinemann, 1938)Google Scholar ; Wrigley, Chris, Arthur Henderson (Cardiff: GPC Books, 1990)Google Scholar ; Cross, Colin, Philip Snowden (London: Barrie & Rockliffe, 1966)Google Scholar .

4 In fact, one of the author's under-graduate students (aged 20) declared recently that he despised MacDonald because of what he did to the Labour Party in 1931.

5 D. C. Watt, review on cover of Marquand, David, Ramsay MacDonald (London: Jonathan Cape, 1977)Google Scholar .

6 Ibid.

7 Cowling, Maurice, The Impact of Labour 1920–1924 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1971)Google Scholar .

8 See, for example, Attlee, C. R., The Labour Party in Perspective (London: Victor Gollancz, 1937)Google Scholar ; Iconoclast, J Ramsay MacDonald, 1923–1925, and Adelman, Paul, The Rise of the Labour Party 1880–1944 (London: Longman, 1996)Google Scholar .

9 W. Lyman, Richard, The First Labour Government 1924 (London: Chapman & Hall, 1957)Google Scholar .

10 Shepherd, John and Laybourn, Keith, Britain's First Labour Government (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

11 Paul Adelman, The Rise of the Labour Party, p. 58.

12 Quoted by Roskill, Stephen, in Hankey, Man of Secrets, Volume 2 1919–1931 (London: Collins, 1972), p. 357Google Scholar .

13 Kirkpatrick, Ivone, The Inner Circle (London: Macmillan, 1959)Google Scholar .

14 Roskill, , Man of Secrets, p. 381Google Scholar .

15 Lyman, , First Labour Government, p. 105Google Scholar .

16 Attlee, , The Labour Party in Perspective, pp. 51–52Google Scholar .

17 See, for example, Iconoclast, who states that many party members felt that the only reason for taking office in 1924 was ‘for a purely spectacular action’, J Ramsay MacDonald, p. 16.

18 See, for example, Cowling, The Impact of Labour 1920–1924; Marquand, Ramsay MacDonald, and Shepherd and Laybourn, Britain's First Labour Government.

19 MacDonald Papers, PRO30/69/1743/1, Diary entry (13 January 1923).

20 Ibid., (9 December 1923).

21 See, for example, the account in Lyman, Richard, First Labour Government,Google Scholar chap. VII.

22 For a detailed description of MacDonald's Cabinet-making process, see Marquand, Ramsay MacDonald, pp. 300ff.

23 Unpublished biographical notes on William Leach, prepared by S. Bradfield, a freelance journalist, in the possession of Leach's grandson, Richard Leach.

24 Cowling, , Impact of Labour, p. 372Google Scholar .

25 Unpublished biographical notes on William Leach.

26 Marquand, , Ramsay MacDonald, p. 299Google Scholar .

27 Ibid., pp. 301–3.

28 See, for instance, Marquand, Ramsay MacDonald; Lyman, First Labour Government; Sherpherd and Laybourn, Britain's First Labour Government, and Kitching, C. J., Britain and the Problem of International Disarmament, 1919–1934 (London: Routledge, 1999)Google Scholar , for a detailed discussion on Cabinet formation.

29 Hankey Papers, HNKY 4/6, Correspondence file: Hankey to Smuts (1 April 1924).

30 Ibid.

31 Ibid., HKNY 3/12. Hankey to Adeline (11 August 1924).

32 Roskill, Stephen, Hankey, Man of Secrets, Volume II, 1919–1931 (Collins, London, 1972), p. 375Google Scholar .

33 Cabinet Conclusions, CAB23/47/148, 7(24) (23 January 1924).

34 Ibid.

35 Ibid., 8(24) (26 January 1924).

36 Hankey Papers, HKNY 4/16, Hankey to Smuts (22 May 1924).

37 Shepherd, and Laybourn, , Britain's First Labour Government, p. 104Google Scholar .

38 Ibid., p. 105.

39 Since 1920, moves had been made to implement trade agreements with the Soviet Union, but the resumption of diplomatic relations was considered to be fraught with political difficulties. At the time of the Genoa Conference in 1922 Lloyd George, had stressed the necessity of resuming full diplomatic relations before a trade agreement could be concluded. See, for example, CAB/23/26, Memorandum by Hankey relating to Note recording conversation between Lloyd George and Benes (20 February 1922).

40 For a detailed discussion of the question of relations with Russia, see Lyman, First Labour Government, chap. XI.

41 CAB23/47/148, 9(24)1 Cabinet Conclusions (4 February 1924).

42 Ibid.

43 Ibid.

44 Cooper, Duff, Old Men Forget (London, 1953), p. 123Google Scholar . Duff Cooper was Secretary for Arthur Ponsonby, Parliamentary Under-Secretary at the Foreign Office in 1924, and implies, in his diary entry for 29 January 1924, that this delay was routine.

45 Lyman, , First Labour Government, p. 187Google Scholar .

46 Ibid., p. 191.

47 CAB23/47/148, 44(24), Cabinet Conclusions (30 July 1924).

48 Ibid.

49 Ball, Stuart, Parliament and Politics in the Age of Baldwin and MacDonald: The Headlam Diaries, 1923–1935 (The Historians Press, 1992)Google Scholar ; Diary entry (7 August 1924), p. 42.

50 Webb, Sidney, ‘The First Labour Government’, Political Quarterly, 32 (1961), p. 22CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

51 See, for example, CAB23/47/148, 27(14)8, Cabinet Conclusions (15 April 1924), and 32(24)5 (15 May 1924).

52 CAB24/165, Cabnet Memoranda, CP273, Interim Report of the Industrial Unrest Committee (20 April 1924).

53 Ibid.

54 Hankey Papers, HKNY 4/16, Hankey to Smuts (22 May 1924).

55 Ibid.

56 Letter of 26 January 1924, the text of which appeared in The Times (4 February 1924).

57 See, for example, Fischer, Conan, The Ruhr Crisis 1923–1924 (Oxford University Press, 2003)Google Scholar , and O'Riordan, Elspeth, Britain and the Ruhr Crisis (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2001)Google Scholar .

58 PRO30/69/1753/1, MacDonald Diary entry (22 June 1924).

59 Ibid., (17 July 1924).

60 Ibid.

61 Ibid., Diary entry (23 July 1924).

62 Ibid., Diary entry (5 August 1924).

63 Ibid.

64 Ibid.

65 Ibid., Diary entry (8 August 1924).

66 Ibid.

67 Ibid.

68 Ibid., Diary entry (12 August 1924).

69 Ibid., Diary entry (13 August 1924).

70 Ibid., Diary entry (12 August 1924).

71 Ibid., Diary entry (16 August 1924).

72 Roskill, , Hankey, Man of Secrets, p. 374Google Scholar .

73 PRO30/69/1753/1, MacDonald Diary entry (9 October 1924).

74 CAB2/3 Minutes of 140th Meeting of the CID (10 June 1921).

75 CAB23/47, Cabinet Conclusions 18(24) Appendix (5 March 1924).

76 Ibid.

77 Ibid.

78 Ranft, B. McL, The Beatty Papers (Scholar Press, for the Navy Records Society, 1993), p. 362Google Scholar .

79 Chalmers, W. S., The Life and Letters of David Beatty, Admiral of the Fleet (London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1951), p. 395Google Scholar .

80 Ibid., Letter to Lady Beatty (3 February 1924).

81 Ibid., (9 February 1924).

82 Ranft, , Beatty Papers, p. 274Google Scholar ; Beatty to Lady Beatty (23 February 1924).

83 Chalmers, , Life and Letters (19 February 1924)Google Scholar .

84 Ranft, , Beatty Papers, p. 392Google Scholar ; Beatty to Lady Beatty (3 March 1924).

85 CAB23/47, Cabinet Conclusions 21(24) (17 March 1924).

86 CAB21/335, CID subcommittee on the Development of the Singapore Naval Base (June 1930).

87 For a detailed account of the League's search for a disarmament agreement see, inter alia, Carolyn J. Kitching, Britain and the Problem of International Disarmament; Richardson, Dick, The Evolution of British Disarmament Policy in the 1920s (London: Pinter, 1989)Google Scholar ; Robert Cecil, Lord, A Great Experiment (London: Cape, 1941)Google Scholar .

88 CAB4/8, CID Paper No. 383-BH, Memorandum by Lord Robert Cecil (21 December 1922).

89 CAB2/3, Minutes of 171st Meeting of CID (11 April 1923).

90 Marquand, , Ramsay MacDonald, p. 169Google Scholar .

91 MacDonald Papers, PRO30/69/1753/1, Diary entry (3 February 1924).

92 Ibid.

93 Ibid.

94 Cecil Papers, Add Ms.51081, ff. 36–39. Memorandum by Cecil to MacDonald (23 June 1924).

95 Ibid.

96 Ibid., fn. 18; MacDonald to Cecil (25 February 1924).

97 CAB23/48, Cabinet Conclusions 35(24(a)) (30 May 1924).

98 Ibid.

99 PRO30/69/1753/1, MacDonald Diary entry (21 September 1924).

100 Ibid.

101 Lyman, , First Labour Government, p. 173Google Scholar .

102 Marquand, , Ramsay MacDonald, p. 352Google Scholar .

103 Ibid., pp. 173–4.

104 PRO30/69/1753/1, MacDonald Diary entry (21 September 1924).

105 CAB24/165, Cabinet Memoranda CP200 (16 March 1924).

106 Marquand, , Ramsay MacDonald, p. 355Google Scholar .

107 CAB24/119, Cabinet Memoranda, Paper CP456(34), Memorandum by the First Lord of the Admiralty (27 September 1924).

108 CAB2/4, Minutes of 190th Meeting of the CID (4 December 1924).

109 Parmoor, Lord, A Retrospect (London: Heinemann, 1936), p. 251Google Scholar .

110 Ibid, p. 254.

111 CAB16/56, subcommittee of the CID on the Protocol for Pacific Settlement of International Disputes, GP(24), 1st meeting (18 December 1924).

112 For an assessment of the disarmament and security implications of Locarno, see Kitching, Carolyn J., ‘Locarno and the Irrelevance of Disarmament’,’ in Johnson, G (ed.), Locarno Revisited: European Diplomacy 1920–1929 (London: Routledge, 2004)Google Scholar .

113 Ramsay MacDonald, J., Protocol or Pact (London: Labour Party, 1925), p. 2Google Scholar .

114 Ibid.

115 Ibid., p. 3.

116 Ibid.

117 Marquand, , Ramsay MacDonald, p. 467Google Scholar .

118 Cecil Papers, Add Ms.51081, ff.1–3, Letter from MacDonald to Cecil (22 February 1923).

119 Ibid.

120 See, for instance, Cecil Papers Add Ms.51070, F.67 Letter from Austen Chamberlain to Robert Cecil (19 June 1925): Lyman, , First Labour Government, pp. 176–179Google Scholar , though the latter states that Nicholson in King George V, accepts this view by implication, it is by no means clear whether this is the case.

121 Ibid., Add Ms.51106, Ff.214–220, Noel-Baker to Cecil (15 September 1924).

122 Ibid., Add Ms.51080, Ff.143–6, Memorandum from Cecil to Stanley Baldwin (22 March 1925).

123 Crowe, Sibyl and Corp, Edward, Our Ablest Public Servant (Devon: Merlin Books, 1993), pp. 447–448Google Scholar .

124 Neilson, Keith and Otte, T. G., The Permanent Under-Secretary for Foreign Affairs, 1854–1946, (London: Routledge, 2009), p. 175Google Scholar .

125 Otte, T. G., ‘Between Old Diplomacy and New: Eyre Crowe and British Foreign Policy, 1914–1925’, in Johnson, Gaynor (ed.), Peacemaking, Peacemakers and Diplomacy, 1880–1939: Essays in Honour of Professor Alan Sharp (Newcastle Upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2010)Google Scholar .

126 Vansittart, Lord, The Mist Procession (London: Hutchinson, 1958), p. 323Google Scholar .

127 Kirkpatrick, , Inner Cricle, p. 27Google Scholar .

128 Ferris, John Robert, Men, Money, and Diplomacy: The Evolution of British Strategic Foreign Policy, 1919–1926 (New York: Cornell University Press, 1989), p. 144Google Scholar .

129 For more detail on the situation in Egypt and Palestine, see Shepherd, and Laybourn, , Britain's First Labour Government, pp. 151–153Google Scholar .

130 Adelman, , The Rise of Labour, p. 60Google Scholar . For more detail on the Campbell Case see Marquand, Ramsay MacDonald; Cowling, The Impact of Labour, and Shepherd and Laybourn, Britain's First Labour Government.

131 For more detail on the impact of the Zinoviev Letter, see Ibid.

132 Marquand, , Ramsay MacDonald, p. 300Google Scholar .