Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-03T03:32:26.179Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Democratising food: The case for a deliberative approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2020

Merisa S. Thompson Open the ORCID record for Merisa S. Thompson [Opens in a new window] ,
Alasdair Cochrane Open the ORCID record for Alasdair Cochrane [Opens in a new window]  and
Justa Hopma Open the ORCID record for Justa Hopma [Opens in a new window]
Merisa S. Thompson*
Affiliation:
University of Birmingham
Alasdair Cochrane
Affiliation:
University of Sheffield
Justa Hopma
Affiliation:
Independent Researcher
*
*Corresponding author. Email: m.s.thompson@bham.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Prevailing political and ethical approaches that have been used to both critique and propose alternatives to the existing food system are lacking. Although food security, food sovereignty, food justice, and food democracy all offer something important to our reflection on the global food system, none is adequate as an alternative to the status quo. This article analyses each in order to identify the prerequisites for such an alternative approach to food governance. These include a focus on goods like nutrition and health, equitable distribution, supporting livelihoods, environmental sustainability, and social justice. However, other goods, like the interests of non-human animals, are not presently represented. Moreover, incorporating all of these goods is incredibly demanding, and some are in tension. This raises the question of how each can be appropriately accommodated and balanced. The article proposes that this ought to be done through deliberative democratic processes that incorporate the interests of all relevant parties at the local, national, regional, and global levels. In other words, the article calls for a deliberative approach to the democratisation of food. It also proposes that one promising potential for incorporating the interests of all affected parties and addressing power imbalances lies in organising the scope and remit of deliberation around food type.

Keywords

Deliberative DemocracyFood PoliticsFood JusticeFood SecurityGlobal Food SystemDemocratisationNon-Human Animals
Type
Research Article
Information
Review of International Studies , Volume 46 , Issue 4 , October 2020 , pp. 435 - 455
Copyright
Copyright © British International Studies Association 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Clapp, Jennifer, Food (Cambridge, UK: Polity, 2012)Google Scholar.

2 Holt-Giménez, Eric and Shattuck, Annie, ‘Food crises, food regimes and food movements: Rumblings of reform or tides of transformation?’, Journal of Peasant Studies, 38:1 (2011), pp. 109–44CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

3 Clapp, Jennifer, ‘Food security and food sovereignty: Getting past the binary’, Dialogues in Human Geography, 4:2 (2014), pp. 206–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hopma, Justa and Woods, Michael, ‘Political geographies of “food security” and “food sovereignty”’, Geography Compass, 8:11 (2014), pp. 773–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 Alonso-Fradejas, Alberto, Borras, Saturnino M. Jr, Holmes, Todd, Holt-Giménez, Eric and Robbins, Martha Jane, ‘Food sovereignty: Convergence and contradictions, conditions and challenges’, Third World Quarterly, 36:3 (2015), pp. 431–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Bernstein, Henry, ‘Food sovereignty via the “peasant way”: A skeptical view’, The Journal of Peasant Studies, 41:6 (2014), pp. 1031–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Bradley, Katharine and Herrera, Hank, ‘Decolonizing food justice: Naming, resisting, and researching colonizing forces in the movement’, Antipode, 48:1 (2016), pp. 97–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 Peters, Anne, ‘Global animal law: What it is and why we need it’, Transnational Environmental Law, 5:1 (2016), pp. 9–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Schlottmann, Christopher and Sebo, Jeff, Food, Animals, and the Environment: An Ethical Approach (New York, NY: Routledge, 2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 Food and Agricultural Organization (hereafter FAO), ‘World Food Security: A Reappraisal of the Concepts and Approaches’ (Rome: FAO, 1983); Maxwell, Simon, ‘Food security: A post-modern perspective’, Food Policy, 21:2 (1996), pp. 155–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7 United Nations, ‘Report of the World Food Conference’ (5–16 November 1974) (New York, NY: United Nations, 1975), p. 6.

8 Sen, Amartya, Poverty and Famines: An Essay on Entitlement and Deprivation (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1981)Google Scholar.

9 FAO, ‘Rome Declaration of World Food Security and World Food Summit Plan of Action’ (Rome: FAO, 1996), p. 3.

10 See, for example, FAO, ‘State of Insecurity in the CARICOM Caribbean’ (Rome: FAO, 2015); Thompson, Merisa S., ‘Still searching for (food) sovereignty: Why are radical discourses only partially mobilised in the independent Anglo-Caribbean?’, Geoforum, 101 (2019), pp. 90–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

11 Clapp, ‘Food security and food sovereignty’, p. 207.

12 McMichael, Philip and Schneider, Mindi, ‘Food security politics and the Millennium Development Goals’, Third World Quarterly, 32:1 (2011), pp. 119–39CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

13 Holt-Giménez, Eric and Shattuck, Annie, ‘Food crises, food regimes and food movements: Rumblings of reform or tides of transformation?’, Journal of Peasant Studies, 38:1 (2011), pp. 109–44CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

14 Edelman, Marc, ‘Food sovereignty: Forgotten genealogies and future regulatory challenges’, Journal of Peasant Studies, 41:6 (2014), pp. 959–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

15 Holt-Giménez and Shattuck, ‘Food crises, food regimes and food movements’.

16 La Vía Campesina, ‘Declaration of Food Sovereignty’ (Rome: La Vía Campesina, 1996), p. 1.

17 International Planning Committee (IPC) 2002 definition.

18 Declaration of Nyéléni, Sélingué, Mali (2007), available at: {https://nyeleni.org/spip.php?article290} accessed 28 October 2018.

19 Altieri, Miguel A., ‘Agroecology, small farms, and food sovereignty’, in Magdoff, Fred and Tokar, Brian (eds), Agriculture and Food in Crisis: Conflict, Resistance, and Renewal (New York: Monthly Review Press, 2010), pp. 253–66Google Scholar.

20 Goulet, Richard, ‘“Food sovereignty”: A step forward in the realisation of the right to food’, Law, Social Justice & Global Development Journal, 1:13 (2009), pp. 1–23Google Scholar; Thompson, Merisa S., ‘Critical perspectives on gender, food and political economy’, in Elias, Juanita and Roberts, Adrienne, Handbook on the International Political Economy of Gender (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2018), pp. 470–85Google Scholar.

21 Agarwal, Bina, ‘Food sovereignty, food security and democratic choice: Critical contradictions, difficult conciliations’, Journal of Peasant Studies, 41:6 (2014), pp. 1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

22 Ibid.; Thompson, ‘Still searching for (food) sovereignty’.

23 Bernstein, ‘Food sovereignty via the “peasant way”’.

24 Clendenning, Jessica, Dressler, Wolfram H., and Richards, Carol, ‘Food justice or food sovereignty? Understanding the rise of urban food movements in the USA’, Agriculture and Human Values, 33 (2016), pp. 165–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Gottlieb, Robert and Joshi, Anupama, Food Justice (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2010), p. 6CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

25 Grace Githiri, ‘Enhancing Food Justice for Urban Communities in Africa’, UN Volunteers, available at: {https://www.unv.org/our-stories/enhancing-food-justice-urban-communities-africa} accessed 24 September 2019.

26 Holt-Giménez and Shattuck, ‘Food crises, food regimes and food movements’.

27 Gottlieb and Joshi, Food Justice, p. 6.

28 Ibid., p. ix.

29 Ibid., pp. 5–6.

30 Alkon, Alison Hope and Agyeman, Julian, Cultivating Food Justice: Race, Class, and Sustainability (Cambridge: MIT Press, 2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Bradley and Herrera, ‘Decolonizing food justice’; Julie Guthman, ‘“If they only knew”: The unbearable whiteness of alternative food’, in Hope Alkon and Agyeman, Cultivating Food Justice, pp. 263–81.

31 Cadieux, K. and Slocum, Rachel, ‘What does it mean to do food justice?’, Journal of Political Ecology, 22:1 (2015), pp. 1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

32 Agyeman, Julian and McEntee, Jesse, ‘Moving the field of food justice forward through the lens of urban political ecology’, Geography Compass, 8:3 (2014), pp. 211–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Alkon, Alison Hope, ‘Food justice and the challenge to neoliberalism’, Gastronomica: The Journal of Critical Food Studies, 14:2 (2014), pp. 27–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Levkoe, Charles Z., ‘Learning democracy through food justice movements’, Agriculture and Human Values, 23:1 (2006), pp. 89–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

33 Lang, Tim, ‘Towards a food democracy’, in Griffiths, Sian and Wallace, Jennifer (eds), Consuming Passions: Food in the Age of Anxiety (Manchester University Press, 1998), p. 18Google Scholar.

34 Blake, Megan, ‘Landscape and the politics of food justice’, in Zeunert, Joshua and Waterman, Tim, Routledge Handbook of Landscape and Food (Oxon: Routledge, 2018), pp. 487–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

35 Blake, ‘Landscape and the politics of food justice’, p. 491.

36 Hassanein, Neva, ‘Practicing food democracy: A pragmatic politics of transformation’, Journal of Rural Studies, 19:1 (2003), p. 79CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

37 Hassanein, Neva, ‘Locating food democracy: Theoretical and practical ingredients’, Journal of Hunger & Environmental Nutrition, 3:2–3 (2008), pp. 286–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

38 Jill Carlson and Jahi M. Chappell, ‘Deepening Food Democracy’, Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy (Washington: IATP, 2015), pp. 6–7.

39 Johnston, Josée, Biro, Andrew, and MacKendrick, Norah, ‘Lost in the supermarket: The corporate-organic foodscape and the struggle for food democracy’, Antipode, 41:3 (2009), pp. 509–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

40 Moragues-Faus, Ana, ‘Problematising justice definitions in public food security debates: Towards global and participative food justices’, Geoforum, 84 (2017), p. 472CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

41 Jill Carlson and Jahi M. Chappell, ‘Deepening Food Democracy’, Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy (Washington: IATP, 2015), p. 6.

42 Shiva, Vandana, Earth Democracy: Justice, Sustainability and Peace (London: Zed Books, 2005)Google Scholar.

43 Coveney, John and Booth, , Food Democracy: From Consumer to Food Citizen (New York, NY: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2015)Google Scholar.

44 Moragues-Faus, Ana, ‘Emancipatory or neoliberal food politics? Exploring the “politics of collectivity” of buying groups in the search for egalitarian food democracies’, Antipode, 49:2 (2017), p. 461CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

45 Cochrane, Alasdair, Sentientist Politics: A Theory of Global Inter-Species Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Cochrane, Alasdair, Animal Rights without Liberation (New York: Columbia University Press, 2012)Google Scholar.

46 Much has of course been written in defence of this view, but one of the classic statements comes in Singer, Peter, Animal Liberation (2nd edn, London: Pimlico, 1995)Google Scholar.

47 See, for example, Article 13, Title II of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), available at: {https://ec.europa.eu/food/animals/welfare_en} accessed 3 February 2019.

48 Ibrahim, Darian, ‘The anti cruelty statute: A study in animal welfare’, Journal of Animal Law and Ethics, 1 (2006), pp. 175–204Google Scholar.

49 White, Steven, ‘Into the void: International law and the protection of animal welfare’, Global Policy, 4:4 (2013), pp. 391–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

50 See Hsieh, Nien-hê, ‘Incommensurable values’, in Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Stanford: Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, 2016)Google Scholar.

51 Goodin, Robert E., ‘Enfranchising all affected interests, and its alternatives’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, 35:1 (2007), pp. 40–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

52 On representing animals politically, see Donaldson, Sue and Kymlicka, Will, Zoopolis: A Political Theory of Animal Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011)Google Scholar; and Meijer, Eva, ‘Political communication with animals’, Humanimalia, 5:1 (2013)Google Scholar.

53 Thompson, Merisa S., ‘Cultivating “new” gendered food producers: Intersections of power and identity in the postcolonial nation of Trinidad’, Review of International Political Economy (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

54 See, for example, Brennan, Jason, Against Democracy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2016)Google Scholar and Estlund, David, ‘Why not epistocracy?’, in Reshotko, Naomi (ed.), Desire, Identity and Existence: Essays in Honor of T. M. Penner (Kelowna, BC: Academic Printing & Publishing, 2003), pp. 53–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

55 Cohen, Joshua, ‘Deliberation and democratic legitimacy’, in Hamlin, Alan and Pettit, Philip (eds), The Good Polity: Normative Analysis of the State (New York: Blackwell, 1989), pp. 17–34Google Scholar.

56 Dryzek, John S., Deliberative Democracy and beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Elster, Jon, Deliberative Democracy (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Gutman, Amy and Thompson, Dennis, Why Deliberative Democracy? (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

57 See Duncan, J. and Barling, D., ‘Renewal through participation in global food security governance: Implementing the international food security and nutrition civil society mechanism to the Committee on World Food Security’, International Journal of the Sociology of Agriculture and Food, 19 (2012), pp. 143–61Google Scholar.

58 Ankeny, Rachel A., ‘Inviting everyone to the table strategies for more effective and legitimate food policy via deliberative approaches’, Journal of Social Philosophy, 47:1 (2016), pp. 10–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

59 Scottish Food Coalition, ‘A Seat at the Table: Becoming a Good Food Nation is Everyone's Business’ (2018), p. 1, available at: {http://www.nourishscotland.org/resources/reports/} accessed 7 November 2018.

60 Lucy Parry, ‘Kitchen Table Conversations’, Participedia, available at: {https://participedia.net/en/methods/kitchen-table-conversations} accessed 7 November 2018.

61 Nourish Scotland, ‘A Good Food Nation Bill to Transform Scotland's Food System’, available at: {http://www.nourishscotland.org/campaigns/good-food-nation-bill/} accessed 10 November 2018.

62 Ankeny, ‘Inviting everyone to the table strategies’; Young, Iris Marion, Inclusion and Democracy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000)Google Scholar.

63 Levkoe, Charles Z. and Sheedy, Amanda, ‘A people-centred approach to food policy making: Lessons from Canada's People's Food Policy project’, Journal of Hunger & Environmental Nutrition (2017), pp. 1–21Google Scholar.

64 See Brem-Wilson, Josh, ‘La Vía Campesina and the UN Committee on World Food Security: Affected publics and institutional dynamics in the nascent transnational public sphere’, Review of International Studies, 43:2 (2017), pp. 302–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

65 McKeon, Nora, ‘Global food governance in an era of crisis: Lessons from the United Nations Committee on World Food Security’, Canadian Food Studies, 2:2 (2015), pp. 328–34Google Scholar.

66 UN Committee on World Food Security (hereafter CFS), ‘Reform of the Committee on World Food Security’, Committee on World Food Security (14–16 October 2009), p. 2, available at: {http://www.fao.org/tempref/docrep/fao/meeting/018/k7197e.pdf} accessed 10 January 2019.

67 Ibid., p. 5.

68 CFS, ‘CFS Structure’ (n.d.), available at: {http://www.fao.org/cfs/home/about/structure/en/} accessed 28 June 2019.

69 CFS, ‘Reform of the Committee on World Food Security’.

70 Ibid.

71 Duncan, Jessica and Claeys, Priscilla, ‘Politicizing food security governance through participation: Opportunities and opposition’, Food Security, 10:6 (2018), pp. 1411–24CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

72 Ibid., p. 1418.

73 CFS, ‘The Committee on World Food Security: A Multi-Stakeholder, Evidence-Based Approach to Policy-Making’ (2015), p. 2, available at: {http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/cfs/Docs1516/About/CFS_Multistakeholder_Approach.pdf} accessed 22 June 2019.

74 Hospes, Otto, ‘Food sovereignty: The debate, the deadlock, and a suggested detour’, Agriculture and Human Values, 31:1 (2014), p. 128CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

75 Declaration of Nyéléni (2007).

76 McKeon, ‘Global food governance in an era of crisis’, p. 331.

77 Ibid., p. 331.

78 Duncan and Claeys, ‘Politicizing food security governance through participation’, p. 1414.

79 Terlouw, Jan C. et al. , Eten & Genen: een publiek debat over biotechnologie en voedel; rapport uitgebracht door de staatscommissie biotechnologie en voedsel (Den Haag, Ministerie van Landbow: 2002)Google Scholar.

80 Hanssen, Lucien, Gutteling, Jan M., Lagerwerf, L., Bartels, J., and Roeterdink, W., In de marge van het publiek debat Eten & Genen: Flankerend onderzoek in opdracht van de Commissie Biotechnologie en Voedsel [In the Margins of the Public Debate: ‘Eating and Genes’] (Universiteit Twente: Afdeling Communicatiewetenschap, 2001)Google Scholar.

81 Karen Pendergrass, ‘Is the Paleo Diet Sustainable? Paleo Foundation’, available at: {https://paleofoundation.com/is-the-paleo-diet-sustainable/} accessed 8 October 2018.

82 Dauvergne, Peter, ‘The global politics of the business of “sustainable” palm oil’, Global Environmental Politics, 18:2 (2018), pp. 34–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

83 The High Level Panel of Experts on Food Security and Nutrition, ‘Multi-stakeholder Partnerships’ (Rome: High Level Panel of Experts, FAO, 2018).

84 FAO, ‘About the WBF’, available at: {http://www.fao.org/world-banana-forum/about-the-forum/en/} accessed 25 September 2018.

85 Banana Link, ‘The World Banana Forum Consolidates and Celebrates the Achievements of Industry Cooperation’, available at: {http://www.bananalink.org.uk/world-banana-forum-consolidates-and-celebrates-achievements-industry-cooperation} accessed 28 September 2018.

86 Ibid.

87 Himmelroos, Staffan, ‘Discourse quality in deliberative citizen forums – a comparison of four deliberative mini-publics’, Journal of Public Deliberation, 13:1 (2017), pp. 1–28Google Scholar.

88 Ibid., emphasis added

89 Smith, Graham, Democratic Innovations: Designing Institutions for Citizen Participation (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

90 Ibid., p. 169.

91 Smith, Democratic Innovations.

92 Ibid.

93 Karpowitz, Christopher F., Raphael, Chad, and Hammond, Allen S., ‘Deliberative democracy and inequality: Two cheers for enclave deliberation among the disempowered’, Politics & Society, 37:4 (2009), pp. 576–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

94 Ibid., p. 604.

95 Ibid., p. 582.

96 Mansbridge, Jane, ‘Using power/fighting power: The polity’, in Benhabib, Seyla (ed.), Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996), p. 51Google Scholar.

97 Karpowitz, Raphael, and Hammond, ‘Deliberative democracy and inequality’, p. 580.

98 Curato, Nicole, Hammond, Marit, and Min, John B., Power in Deliberative Democracy: Norms, Forums, Systems (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019), p. 173CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

99 Ibid.

100 Ibid., p. vi.

101 Ibid., pp. 175–6.

102 Mansbridge, ‘Using power/fighting power’, pp. 58–60.