Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vpsfw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T16:28:08.308Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Digital diasporas' challenge to traditional power: the case of TibetBoard

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2011

Abstract

This article examines power implications of digital diasporas and the identity negotiation processes they afford. Members of diasporas are potentially socially and psychologically disempowered by two sources: the majority society into which they are dispersed; and the traditional social structures and culture from which they emerged. This potential disempowerment highlights the important role of power in facilitating (or not) migrant integration into new societies, and the integration of values and norms that are increasingly considered universal. The diaspora experience and Internet discussion forums provide enabling normative structures and discourses for individuals to define and pursue their own interests and ideals. Following a review of the literatures on diaspora identity hybridity and power, the case of TibetBoard illustrates how information technology enables diaspora members to explore, negotiate, and validate their self-determined identity and political perspectives, moving beyond passive adoption of traditional perspectives rooted in the Tibetan community of the homeland and in exile.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British International Studies Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See, for example, Nelson-Jones, Richard, ‘Diverse Goals for Multicultural Counselling and Therapy’, Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 15 (2002), pp. 133143CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; Hall, Stuart, ‘Cultural Identity and Diaspora’, in Rutherford, J. (ed.), Identity: Community, culture, difference (London: Lawrence, 1990), pp. 222237Google Scholar ; Brinkerhoff, Jennifer M., ‘Diaspora Identity and the Potential for Violence: Toward an Identity-Mobilization Framework’, Identity: An International Journal of Theory and Research, 8 (2008), pp. 6788CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

2 Etzioni, Amitai, The New Golden Rule: Community and Morality in a Democratic Society (New York: Basic Books, 1996), p. 127Google Scholar .

3 Etzioni, Amitai, ‘The Good Society’, Seattle Journal of Social Justice, 1 (2002), pp. 8396, 89Google Scholar .

4 Etzioni, ‘The Good Society’, p. 84.

5 Ibid.

6 There is a vast and important literature on immigrant integration. It is beyond the scope of this article to review the whole of it. For a broader discussion of how it applies to digital diasporas, see Brinkerhoff, Jennifer M., Digital Diasporas: Identity and Transnational Engagement (Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

7 For the case of the Hindu diaspora, see, for example, Lal, Vinay, ‘The Politics of History on the Internet: Cyber-diasporic Hinduism and the North American Hindu diaspora’, Diaspora: A Journal of Transnational Studies, 8 (1999), pp. 137172CrossRefGoogle Scholar . This phenomenon has also been observed among some members of the Egyptian Copt diaspora, see Brinkerhoff, Jennifer M., Digital Diasporas: Identity and Transnational Engagement (Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

8 Hermans, Hubert and Kemper, Harry, ‘Moving Cultures: The Perilous Problems of Cultural Dichotomies in a Globalizing Society’, American Psychologist, 53 (1998), pp. 11111120CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; Lavie, Smadar and Swedenburg, Ted (eds), Displacement, diaspora, and geographies of identity (Durham and London: Duke University Press, 1996)Google Scholar ; Friedman, Jonathan, Cultural Identity and Global Process (London and Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1994)Google Scholar .

9 Nelson-Jones, ‘Diverse Goals for Multicultural Counselling and Therapy’.

10 Gittel, Ross and Vidal, Avis, Community Organizing: Building Social Capital as a Development Strategy (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1998)Google Scholar .

11 Falk, Richard A., Human Rights and State Sovereignty (New York: Homes & Meier Publishers, 1981)Google Scholar ; Jacobsen, Michael and Lawson, Stephanie, ‘Between Globalization and Localization: A Case Study of Human Rights versus State Sovereignty’, Global Governance, 5 (1999), pp. 203220Google Scholar .

12 Barnett, Michael and Duvall, Raymond, ‘Power in Global Governance’, in Barnett, Michael and Duvall, Raymond (eds), Power in Global Governance (Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press 2005), pp. 132, 3Google Scholar

13 Barnett and Duvall, ‘Power in Global Governance’, p. 4.

14 Sheffer, Gabriel, ‘A New Field of Study: Modern Diasporas in International Politics’, in Sheffer, Gabriel (ed.), Modern diasporas in international politics (London and Sydney: Croom Helm, 1986), pp. 115, 3Google Scholar .

15 Safran, William, ‘Comparing Diasporas: A Review Essay’, Diaspora: A Journal of Transnational Studies, 8 (1999), pp. 255291, 280281CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

16 Chaliand, Gérard and Rageau, Jean-Pierre, The Penguin Atlas of Diasporas (New York: Penguin, 1997), p. xviGoogle Scholar .

17 Butler, Kim D., ‘Defining Diaspora, Refining a Discourse’, Diaspora: A Journal of Transnational Studies, 10 (2001), pp. 189218, 207CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

18 See Lavie, and Swedenburg, , Displacement, diaspora, and geographies of identityCrossRefGoogle Scholar ; see also, Friedman, , Cultural Identity and Global ProcessGoogle Scholar .

19 Shain, Yossi, Marketing the American Creed Abroad: Diasporas in the US and Their Homelands (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999)Google Scholar ; Shain, Yossi, ‘Multicultural Foreign Policy’, Foreign Policy, 100 (1995), pp. 6988CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

20 Friedman, , Cultural Identity and Global Process, p. 71Google Scholar .

21 Spinner, Jeff, The Boundaries of Citizenship (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1994)Google Scholar ; quoted in Shain, , Marketing the American Creed Abroad, p. 26Google Scholar .

22 Shain, , Marketing the American Creed Abroad, p. 26Google Scholar .

23 Ibid.

24 Raz, Joseph, ‘Multiculturalism: A Liberal Perspective’, Dissent, 41 (1994), pp. 6779Google Scholar .

25 See Brainard, Lori A. and Brinkerhoff, Jennifer M., ‘Lost in Cyberspace: Shedding Light on the Dark Matter of Grassroots Organizations’, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 33 (2004), pp. 32S53SCrossRefGoogle Scholar ; Brinkerhoff, Jennifer M., ‘Digital Diasporas and International Development: Afghan-Americans and the Reconstruction of Afghanistan’, Public Administration and Development, 24 (2004), pp. 397413CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; Brinkerhoff, Jennifer M., ‘Digital Diasporas and Conflict Prevention: The Case of Somalinet.com’, Review of International Studies, 32 (2006), pp. 2547CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

26 CGOs are completely virtual organisations, existing only online and co-created by members, Brainard and Brinkerhoff, ‘Lost in Cyberspace’.

27 Bhatia, Sunil and Ram, Anjali, ‘Locating the Dialogical Self in the Age of Transnational Migrations, Border Crossings and Diasporas’, Culture & Psychology, 7 (2001), pp. 297309CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

28 Tiller, Harry H. and Franz, Tara M., ‘New Ties, Old Ties and Lost Ties: The Use of the Internet in Diaspora’, New Media & Society, 6 (2004), pp. 731752Google Scholar .

29 Hall, Stuart, ‘Old and New Identities, Old and New Ethnicities’, in King, Anthony D. (ed.), Culture, Globalization and the World-System (Houndmills: Macmillan, 1991), pp. 4168CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

30 Vertovec, Stephen, ‘Three Meanings of “Diaspora”, Exemplified among South Asian Religions’, Diaspora: A Journal of Transnational Studies, 6 (1997), pp. 277299, 290CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

31 Vertovec, ‘Three Meanings of “Diaspora”’, p. 290.

32 Cortini, Michela, Mininni, Guiseppe, and Manuti, Amelia, ‘The Diatextual Construction of the Self in Short Message Systems’, Identity: An International Journal of Theory and Research, 4 (2004), pp. 355370CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

33 Vertovec, ‘Three Meanings of “Diaspora”’, p. 291; see, for example, Baumann, Martin, ‘Conceptualizing Diaspora: The Preservation of Religious Identity in Foreign Parts, Exemplified by Hindu Communities Outside India’, Temenos, 31 (1995), pp. 1935Google Scholar ; Vertovec, Stephen and Rogers, A. (eds), Muslim European Youth: Re-producing Religion, Ethnicity, Culture (Aldershot: Ashgate, 1998)Google Scholar .

34 Geertz, Clifford, Islam Observed: Religious Developments in Morocco and Indonesia (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1968)Google Scholar ; quoted in Vertovec, ‘Three Meanings of “Diaspora”’, p. 283.

35 The Alevi are a religious subgroup, found primarily in Turkey (with pockets in Albania and Bulgaria). Alevism is related to Shia Islam and also encompasses elements of pre-Islamic religions of Anatolia and ancient Turkic Shamanism.

36 Sökefeld, Martin, ‘Alevism Online: Re-imagining a Community in Virtual Space’, Diaspora: A Journal of Transnational Studies, 11 (2002), pp. 85123, 105CrossRefGoogle Scholar . Emphasis in original.

37 Lal, ‘The Politics of History on the Internet’.

38 Barnett and Duvall, ‘Power in Global Governance’, p. 3.

39 Ibid., p. 10.

40 Uphoff, Norman, ‘Analytical Issues in Measuring Empowerment at the Community and Local Levels’, in Narayan, Deepa (ed.), Measuring Empowerment: Cross-disciplinary Perspectives (Washington, DC: The World Bank, 2005), pp. 219246Google Scholar .

41 Barnett and Duvall, ‘Power in Global Governance’, p. 16.

42 Barnett, and Duvall, , ‘Power in Global Governance’; Lukes, Steven, Power: A Radical View (London: MacMillan Press, 1974)Google Scholar .

43 MacDonell, Diane, Theories of Discourse: An Introduction (Boston: Blackwell, 1986)Google Scholar ; quoted in Barnett and Duvall, ‘Power in Global Governance’, p. 20.

44 Foucault, Michel, ‘The Juridical Apparatus’, in Connolly, W. (ed.), Legitimacy and the State (New York: New York University Press, 1984), pp. 201222Google Scholar ; Foucault, Michel, ‘Afterward: The Subject of Power’, in Dreyfus, H. and Rabinow, P. (eds), Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics, 2nd edition (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1983), pp. 202220Google Scholar ; quoted in Barnett and Duvall, ‘Power in Global Governance’, p. 21.

45 Hayward, Clarissa Rile, Defacing Power (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000), p. 30CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; quoted in Barnett and Duvall, ‘Power in Global Governance’, p. 21.

46 Uphoff, Norman, ‘Distinguishing Power, Authority, and Legitimacy: Taking Max Weber at his Word using Resource Exchange Analysis’, Polity, 22 (1989), pp. 295322CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; Uphoff, ‘Analytical Issues in Measuring Empowerment’.

47 Appadurai, Arjun, ‘The Capacity to Aspire: Culture and the Terms of Recognition’, in Vijayendra, Rao and Walton, Michael (eds), Culture and Public Action (Palo Alto: Stanford University Press, 2004), pp. 5984Google Scholar .

48 Narayan, Deepa, ‘Conceptual Framework and Methodological Challenges’, in Narayan, Deepa (ed.), Measuring Empowerment: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives (Washington, DC: The World Bank, 2005), pp. 338, 21Google Scholar .

49 Narayan, ‘Conceptual Framework and Methodological Challenges’, p. 21.

50 Diener, Ed and Biswas-Diener, Robert, ‘Psychological Empowerment and Subjective Well-Being’, in Narayan, Deepa (ed.), Measuring Empowerment: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives (Washington, DC: The World Bank, 2005), pp. 125140, 125Google Scholar .

51 See Bandura, Albert, Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control (New York: Freeman, 1997)Google Scholar .

52 Bandura, Albert, ‘Personal and Collective Efficacy in Human Adaptation and Change’, in Adair, J. G., Belanger, D., and Dion, K. L. (eds), Advances in Psychological Science: Social, Personal, and Cultural Aspects, 1 (Hove: Psychology Press, 1998), pp. 5171, 51Google Scholar ; quoted in Diener and Biswas-Diener, ‘Psychological Empowerment and Subjective Well-Being’, p. 138.

53 Deshmukh-Ranadive, Joy, ‘Gender, Power, and Empowerment: An Analysis of Household and Family Dynamics’, in Narayan, Deepa (ed.), Measuring Empowerment: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives (Washington, DC: The World Bank, 2005), pp. 103121Google Scholar .

54 Deshmukh-Ranadive, ‘Gender, Power, and Empowerment’, p. 109.

55 Ibid., p. 113.

56 Ibid.

57 Central Tibetan Administration of His Holiness the Dalai Lama; quoted in International Campaign for Tibet, ‘US proposes new Tibetan refugee admissions program’ (7 September 2005), {http://www.savetibet.org/news/newsitem.php?id=808} accessed 28 July 2006.

58 Baogang, He and Sautman, Barry, ‘The Politics of the Dalai Lama's New Initiative for Autonomy’, Pacific Affairs, 78 (2005/2006), pp. 601629CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

59 Goldstein, Melvyn, Tibet, China, and the US: Reflections on the Tibet Question (Washington, DC: Atlantic Council of the US, 1995)Google Scholar ; quoted in Baogang and Sautman, ‘The Politics of the Dalai Lama's New Initiative for Autonomy’, p. 608.

60 Baogang and Sautman, ‘The Politics of the Dalai Lama's New Initiative for Autonomy’.

61 See Zupp, Adrian, ‘Why won't the Dalai Lama pick a fight?’, The Humanist, 64 (2004), p. 5Google Scholar .

62 Unless otherwise specified, information on TibetBoard derives from my personal interview with the founder, Dorjee Nudup, 12 October 2003. Discussion threads were observed and analysed from May–July, 2003. Two hundred and forty-one threads were selected, with an average of approximately seven replies. I selected discussion threads based on the topic's relevance to the research questions, and randomly selected additional threads in order to partially counter bias selection and to sample the general climate of the digital diaspora. I analysed webpages and their interactive components along two dimensions: the nature of the benefit gained from the member's participation (purposive, material, solidary, and cultural identity) and the type of communication involved (conventional, interpersonal, communal, and announcements). These categories are not mutually exclusive. Quotes from the discussion forums and web pages include the original stylised language, as well as errors in punctuation and spelling.

63 Barnett and Duvall, ‘Power in Global Governance’, p. 3.

64 Etzioni, The New Golden Rule.

65 Barnett and Duvall, ‘Power in Global Governance’, p. 16.

66 Lukes, Power.

67 These benefits are increasingly recognised resulting in intentional efforts to produce CGOs for these purposes. See Srinivasan, Ramesh and Shilton, Katie, ‘The South Asian Web: An Emerging Community Information System in the South Asian Diaspora’, Proceedings of the Ninth Conference on Participatory Design: Expanding boundaries in design, Vol. 1 (Trento, Italy: Association for Computing Machinery, 2006), pp. 125133CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

68 Sökefeld, ‘Alevism Online’, p. 109.

69 It should be noted that diaspora CGOs are also created for explicit political mobilisation purposes, see Kanak, Kilic, ‘Ethnic Media and Politics: The Case of the Use of the Internet by Uyghur Diaspora’, First Monday, 10 (2005)Google Scholar , available at: {http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue10_7/kanat/index.html}.

70 McCormick, Glenn M., ‘Stateless Nations: ‘I pledge Allegiance to… ?’, in Mazarr, Michael J. (ed.), Information Technology and World Politics (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2002), pp. 1123, 12CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

71 Brinkerhoff, ‘Diaspora Identity and the Potential for Violence’.