1 Thomas, Caroline, Global Governance, Development and Human Security: The Challenge of Poverty and Inequality (London: Pluto Press, 2000)Google Scholar ; Commission on Human Security, Human Security Now: Protecting and Empowering People (New York: UN, 2003)Google Scholar ; MacLean, Sandra Jean, Black, David Ross and Shaw, Timothy M. (eds), A Decade of Human Security: Global Governance and New Multilateralisms (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2006)Google Scholar ; Tadjbakhsh, Shahrbanou and Chenoy, Anuradha M., Human Security: Concepts and Implications (London: Routledge, 2007).Google Scholar

2 UN Human Development Reports {http://hdr.undp.org/en/} accessed 4 June 2011; Kaldor, Mary, Human Security (Cambridge: Polity, 2007)Google Scholar ; Martin, Mary and Kaldor, Mary (eds), The EU and Human Security External Interventions and Missions (London: Routledge, 2009).Google Scholar

3 Comments made at ‘Sixth Meeting of the Friends of Human Security’ (4 June 2009), {http://ochaonline.un.org/SixthMeetingoftheFriendsofHumanSecurity/tabid/5709/language/en-US/Default.aspx} accessed 4 June 2011; The UN Trust Fund for Human Security was established in 1999 and the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs created the Human Security Unit in 2004 which manages the Trust Fund, integrates UN human security activities and translates the concept into concrete activities on the ground. Since 1999, the Fund has committed over $340 million to projects in over seventy countries, mainly in Africa, Asia-Pacific and Eastern and Central Asia. {http://ochaonline.un.org/Home/tabid/2097/Default.aspx} accessed 4 June 2011.

4 MacFarlane, Neil S. and Khong, Yuen Foong, Human Security and the UN: a Critical History (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2006)Google Scholar .

5 Chandler, David, ‘Human Security II: Waiting for the Tail To Wag the Dog: A Rejoinder to Ambrosetti, Owen and Wibben’, Security Dialogue, 39 (2008) pp. 465–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

6 Foucault, Michel, Society Must be Defended: Lectures at the Collège de France 1975–1976, trans. Macey, David, ed. Bertani, Mauro and Fontana, Alessandro (New York: Picador, 2003)Google Scholar ; Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1977–1978, trans. Graham Burchell, ed. Michel Senellart (London: Palgrave, 2007)Google Scholar ; The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978–1979, trans. Graham Burchell, ed. Michel Senellart (London: Palgrave, 2008).

7 Krasner, Stephen D., ‘Sharing Sovereignty: New Institutions for Collapsed and Failing States’, International Security, 29 (2004), pp. 85–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; Fearon, James D. and Laitin, David D., ‘Neotrusteeship and the Problem of Weak States’, International Security, 28 (2004), pp. 5–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

8 Elbe, Stefan, ‘AIDS, Security, Biopolitics’, International Relations, 19 (2005) pp. 403–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; Duffield, Mark and Waddell, Nicholas, ‘Securing Humans in a Dangerous World’, International Politics, 43 (2006), pp. 1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; Duffield, Mark, Development, Security and Unending War: Governing the World of Peoples (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2007)Google Scholar ; Berman, Jacqueline, ‘The “Vital Core”: From Bare Life to the Biopolitics of Human Security’, in Shani, Giorgio, Sato, Makoto and Pasha, Mustapha Kamal (eds), Protecting Human Security in a Post 9/11 World: Critical and Global Insights (London: Palgrave, 2007), pp. 30–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; Grayson, Kyle, ‘Human Security as Power/Knowledge: the Biopolitics of a Definitional Debate’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 21 (2008), pp. 383–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; Larrinaga, Miguel De and Doucet, Marc G., ‘Sovereign Power and the Biopolitics of Human Security’, Security Dialogue, 39 (2008), pp. 517–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; Shimizu, Kosuke, ‘Human Security, Governmentality, and Sovereignty: a Critical Examination of Contemporary Discourses on Universalizing Humanity’, in Debrix, François and Lacy, Mark (eds), The Geopolitics of American Insecurity: Terror, Power and Foreign Policy (London: Routledge, 2008), pp. 143–160Google Scholar ; Roberts, David, Global Governance and Biopolitics: Regulating Human Security (London,Zed Books, 2010)Google Scholar ; Doucet, Marc G. and Larrinaga, Miguel de, ‘Human Security and the Securing of Human Life: Tracing Global Sovereign and Biopolitical Rule’, in Chandler, David and Hynek, Niklas (eds), Critical Perspectives on Human Security: Rethinking Emancipation and Power in International Relations (London: Routledge, 2010), pp. 129–143Google Scholar ; Alt, Suvi, ‘Problematizing Life under Biopower: a Foucauldian versus an Agambenite critique of Human Security’, in Chandler, and Hynek, (eds), Critical Perspectives on Human Security, pp. 144–156Google Scholar ; also see Jaeger, Hans-Martin, ‘UN Reform, Biopolitics, and Global Governmentality’, International Theory, 2 (2010), pp. 50–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

9 Hence the argument here departs from David Chandler's criticisms of biopolitical theory, which he argues is a parody of the liberal cosmopolitanism that it aims to undermine. See Chandler, , ‘Critiquing Liberal Cosmopolitanism? The Limits of the Biopolitical Approach’, International Political Sociology, 3 (2009), pp. 53–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

10 Weber, Max, ‘Religious Rejections of the World and their Directions’, From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1946), p. 334Google Scholar .

11 This approach contrasts with much of the recent ‘social turn’ in international studies, which adopts ‘the social’ as a form of explanation and particular ontology while marginalising the historical origins of the very concept. See, for example, Wendt, Alexander, Social Theory of International Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

12 Hobson, J. A., The Social Problem: Life and Work (James Nisbet & Co.: London: 1901)Google Scholar ; Aisenberg, Andrew Robert, Contagion: Disease, Government, and the ‘Social Question’ in Nineteenth Century France (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1999)Google Scholar ; Joyce, Patrick (ed.), The Social in Question: New Bearings in History and the Social Sciences (London: Routledge, 2002)Google Scholar .

13 For an excellent discussion of how political realism dealt with the Social Question in the German context see Steinmetz, George, Regulating the Social: the Welfare State and Local Politics in Imperial Germany (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993), pp. 19–24Google Scholar .

14 Meerhaeghe, Marcel van, ‘Bismarck and the Social Question’, Journal of Economic Studies, 33 (2006), pp. 284–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

15 Myrdal, Gunnar, The Political Element in the Development of Economic Theory, trans. Streeten, Paul (London: Routledge, 1953)Google Scholar ; Polanyi, Karl, The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time (Boston: Beacon Press, [1957], 2001)Google Scholar ; Arendt, Hannah, The Human Condition (Chicago: Chicago University of Press, 1958)Google Scholar ; Habermas, Jürgen, The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: an Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, [1962] 1991)Google Scholar ; Donzelot, Jacques, L'Invention du Social: Essai sur le Déclin des Passions Politiques (Paris: Librairie Arthème, 1984)Google Scholar ; Foucault, ‘Society Must Be Defended’; Castel, Robert, From Manual Workers to Wage Laborers: Transformation of the Social Question, trans. and ed. Boyd, Robert (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction, 2003)Google Scholar ; Steinmetz, Regulating the Social.

16 There is a small, but growing, literature on Arendt in international political theory. See Lang, Anthony Jr. and Williams, John (eds), Hannah Arendt and International Relations: Readings across the Lines (London: Palgrave, 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; Owens, Patricia, Between War and Politics: International Relations and the Thought of Hannah Arendt (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; Hayden, Patrick, Political Evil in a Global Age: Hannah Arendt and International Theory (London: Routledge, 2009)Google Scholar .

17 Arendt, , Promise of Politics (New York,Schocken, 2005), p. 115Google Scholar .

18 ‘The first historical act’, according to Marx and Engels, ‘is thus the production of the means to satisfy these needs [food, water, shelter], the production of material life itself’. Marx, Karl and Engels, Friedrich, The German Ideology (New York: International Publishers, 1970), p. 48Google Scholar .

19 Castel, , From Manual Workers to Wage Laborers, p. 11Google Scholar .

20 Ibid., pp. 16–17.

21 Arendt, , Human Condition, p. 23Google Scholar .

22 Aron, Raymond, Progress and Disillusion: the Dialectics of Modern Society (Middlesex: Penguin, 1968), p. 8Google Scholar .

23 Arendt, Hannah, ‘Karl Marx and the Tradition of Western Political Thought’, Social Research, 69 (2002), p. 295Google Scholar .

24 Arendt, ‘Karl Marx and the Tradition’, p. 295.

25 Castel, , From Manual Workers to Wage Laborers, p. 10Google Scholar .

26 Arendt, , Promise of Politics, p. 83Google Scholar .

27 Ibid., p. 115.

28 Arendt, , Human Condition, p. 7Google Scholar .

29 Levin, Martin, ‘Animal Laborans and Homo Politicus, in Hannah Arendt: a Note’, Political Theory, 7 (1979), p. 523CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

30 Arendt, , Human Condition, p. 7Google Scholar .

31 Ibid., p. 134, emphasis in original.

32 Arendt, ‘Karl Marx and the Tradition’, p. 285; Arendt, , Essays in Understanding, 1930–1954 (New York: Harcourt Brace, 1994), p. 321Google Scholar .

33 Arendt, , Human Condition, p. 173Google Scholar .

34 Ibid., pp. 7, 8, emphasis in original. As Arendt put it, the ‘term “public” literally signifies the world itself, insofar as it is common to all of us and distinguished from our privately owned place in it. This world … is not identical to the earth or with nature … It is related, rather, to the human artifact, the fabrication of human hands, as well as to affairs that go on among those who inhabit the man-made world together … the world, like every in-between, relates and separates men at the same time’. Arendt, , Human Condition, p. 52Google Scholar .

35 See Weber, , ‘Science as a Vocation’, From Max Weber, pp. 129–156Google Scholar ; Schmitt, Carl, The Concept of the Political (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996 [1932])Google Scholar ; Morgenthau, Hans J., Scientific Man vs. Power Politics (Chicago: University of Chicago, 1946)Google Scholar . As Peter Baehr has written, ‘few authors of the twentieth-century offered a more comprehensive alternative to Weber's political and sociological thought than Arendt did.’ See Baehr, , ‘The Grammar of Prudence: Arendt, Jaspers, and the Appraisal of Max Weber’, in Ashheim, Steven E. (ed.), Hannah Arendt in Jerusalem (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2001), pp. 307, 323Google Scholar .

36 Canovan, Margaret, Hannah Arendt: A Reinterpretation of Her Political Thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992), p. 185CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

37 Arendt, , Human Condition, p. 46Google Scholar .

38 Ibid., p. 176, emphasis added.

39 Ibid., pp. 180, 179.

40 Ibid., p. 179. Recalling the significance of natality to action, the experience of disclosing one's who-ness is ‘like a second birth … This insertion is not forced upon us by necessity, like labor, and it is not prompted by utility, like work …; its impulse springs from the beginning which came into the world when we were born and to which we respond by beginning something new’. Arendt, , Human Condition, pp. 176–177Google Scholar .

41 For other recent applications of ‘biopolitics’ to international themes see Masters, Cristina and Dauphinee, Elizabeth (eds), Logics of Biopower and the War on Terror: Living, Dying, Surviving (London: Palgrave, 2007)Google Scholar ; Morton, Stephen and Bygrave, Stephen (eds), Biopolitics and the Defence of Society: Rethinking Foucault in an Age of Terror (London: Palgrave, 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; Dillon, Michael and Reid, JulianThe Liberal Way of War: Killing to Make Life Live (London: Routledge, 2009)Google Scholar ; Dillon, Michael and Neal, Andrew (eds), Foucault, War, Society and Politics (London: Palgrave, 2009)Google Scholar .

42 See, for example, Edkins, Jenny and Pin-Fat, Véronique, ‘Through the Wire: Relations of Power and Relations of Violence’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 34 (2005), pp. 1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar . Edkins and Pin-Fat draw on both Foucault and Giorgio Agamben to argue that we should repudiate all distinctions or drawing of lines between ‘forms of life’. Cf. Owens, Patricia, ‘Reclaiming “Bare Life”? Against Agamben on Refugees’, International Relations, 23 (2009), pp. 567–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

43 Arendt, , Human Condition, p. 47Google Scholar .

44 Fenichel Pitkin, Hanna, The Attack of the Blob: Hannah Arendt's Concept of the Social (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998), p. 226Google Scholar ; see also Benhabib, Seyla, The Reluctant Modernism of Hannah Arendt (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1996)Google Scholar . Arendt clearly and repeatedly gendered her analysis of the social, for example feminising the toil and pain of labour and using masculine imagery to describe the domination over nature associated with work. Crucially, however, she did not posit any fundamental gender hierarchy as integral to the problems she was trying to explicate. As Mary Dietz, has pointed out, the sex-gender binary is displaced in Arendt's work by the tripartite distinction between labour, work and action. Political action escapes the gender dichotomy; politics, properly understood, is neither masculine nor feminine. Dietz, , Turning Operations: Feminism, Arendt, Politics (London: Routledge, 2002)Google Scholar .

45 Pitkin, Attack of the Blob, p. 6.

46 Arendt, , The Origins of Totalitarianism, new ed. with added prefaces (New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1966), p. 152Google Scholar . She goes on, quoting J. A. Hobson, ‘and it is mainly for this reason that imperialists were allowed to become “parasites upon patriotism”’.

47 Arendt, , Human Condition, p. 45Google Scholar ; there has been one other effort to extend Arendt's writing on the social to the international, specifically the ‘evil of neoliberal globalization’ (rather than capitalism in general). See Hayden, , Political Evil in a Global Age, pp. 92–121Google Scholar .

48 These events were ‘the discovery of America and the ensuing exploration of the whole earth; the Reformation, which by expropriating ecclesiastical and monastic possessions started the two-fold process of individual expropriation and the accumulation of social wealth; the invention of the telescope and the development of a new science that considers the nature of the earth from the viewpoint of the universe’. Arendt, , Human Condition, p. 248Google Scholar . In On Revolution, there is even less focus on the rise of the social as an historical formation, but instead an analysis of the ‘high society’ of the French court, an attack on how the ‘Social Question’ was answered during the French Revolution. Arendt, , On Revolution (New York: Viking, 1970), p. 61Google Scholar .

49 Rosenberg, Justin, The Empire of Civil Society: a Critique of the Realist Theory of International Relations (London: Verso, 1994), pp. 156–157Google Scholar ; Polanyi, , The Great Transformation, p. 119Google Scholar .

50 Macpherson, C. B., The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism: From Hobbes to Locke (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1964)Google Scholar .

51 As Smith put it, ‘in the great chess-board of human society, every single piece has a principle of motion of its own, altogether different from that which the legislature might choose to impress upon it’. Smith, , The Essays of Adam Smith (London: Alex Murray and Son, 1869), p. 207Google Scholar .

52 Frisby, David and Sayer, Derek, Society (London: Tavistock, 1986), p. 120Google Scholar ; see also Deleuze, Gilles, ‘Foreword: the Rise of the Social’, in Donzelot, Jacques, The Policing of Families: Welfare versus the State (London: Hutchingson, 1979), pp. ix–xviiGoogle Scholar ; Wolf, Eric R., ‘Inventing Society’, American Ethnologist, 15 (1988), pp. 752–761CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; Rose, Nikolas, ‘The Death of the Social? Re-figuring the Territory of Government’, Economy and Society, 25 (1996), pp. 327–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; Peter Wagner, ‘“An Entirely New Object of Consciousness, of Volition, of Thought”: The Coming into Being and (Almost) Passing Away of “Society” as a Scientific Object’, in Daston, Lorraine (ed.), Biographies of Scientific Objects (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000), pp. 132–157Google Scholar .

53 Hegel, G. W. F., Philosophy of Right (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1967 [1821])Google Scholar ; Polanyi, The Great Transformation; for an excellent critique of Polanyi notion of ‘society as a whole’ see Halperin, Sandra, War and Social Change in Modern Europe: The Great Transformation Revisited (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

54 Arendt, ‘Karl Marx and the Tradition’, p. 288.

55 Rousseau, Jean-Jacques, ‘De l'économie politique’, Grande Encylopédie, 5 (1755)Google Scholar ; available at: {http://www.taieb.net/auteurs/Rousseau/economie.html} accessed 4 June 2011, emphasis added; see also Foucault, , Security, Territory, Population, p. 95Google Scholar .

56 Myrdal, , Political Element, p. 140Google Scholar . According to Habermas, the social arose when ‘the private realm as a whole assumed public relevance’. See Habermas, , Structural Transformation, p. 127Google Scholar .

57 Arendt, , Human Condition, p. 29Google Scholar .

58 Ibid., p. 256.

59 Marx, Karl, Grundrisse: Foundations of the Critique of Political Economy (London: Penguin, 1973)Google Scholar .

60 Moggach, Douglas and Browne, Paul Leduc (eds), The Social Question and the Democratic Revolution: Marx and the Legacy of 1848 (Ottawa, Ont.: University of Ottawa Press, 2000)Google Scholar .

61 Castel, , From Manual Workers to Wage Laborers, pp. 205, 197–198Google Scholar .

62 Arendt, ‘Karl Marx and the Tradition’, p. 284; Castel, , From Manual Workers to Wage Laborers, p. 146Google Scholar .

63 For analysis of the political realist paradigm of social regulation in ‘population-centric’ counterinsurgency see Owens, ‘From Bismarck to Petraeus: The Question of the Social and the Social Question in Counterinsurgency’, European Journal of International Relations (forthcoming).

64 Mommsen, Wolfgang J., Max Weber and German Politics, 1890–1920 (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1984)Google Scholar ; see also Steinmetz, Regulating the Social; van Meerhaeghe, ‘Bismarck and the Social Question’.

65 Schmitt, Carl, The Nomos of the Earth: in the International Law of the Jus Publicum Europaeum (New York: Telos, 2006 [1950]), p. 332, fn. 17Google Scholar . On ‘social imperialism’ see Ulrich Wehler, Hans, The German Empire, 1871–1918 (Oxford: Berg Publishers, 1997)Google Scholar .

66 Durkheim, Émile, The Division of Labour in Society, intro. Lewis A. Coser (NY: New York: Free Press, 1997)Google Scholar ; the apparent opposition between a political realist and even Schmittian logic in the provision of social security and the more liberal and solidarist emphasis implicitly animate the debate over human security. As Pauline Ewan has noted, according to many, ‘rather than the human security agenda's initial “solidarist” concern for poor people in the global North and South, the securitization of poverty, displacement and disease fosters a [Schmittian] logic of enmity that constitutes Southern populations as threats to’ wealthy states in the global North. See Ewan, , ‘Deepening the Human Security Debate: Beyond the Politics of Conceptual Clarification’, Politics, 27 (2007), p. 186CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

67 Arendt, , Between Past and Future: Eight Exercises in Political Thought (New York: Viking, 1968), p. 150Google Scholar . For a more recent rendition of this argument see Neocleous, Mark, Critique of Security (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

68 Arendt, , Human Condition, pp. 35, 69Google Scholar .

69 Ibid., p. 35.

70 Ibid., p. 135.

71 Foucault, , Society Must be Defended, pp. 239–240Google Scholar ; see also Foucault, , History of Sexuality: an Introduction, Volume 1, trans. Hurley, Robert (New York: Vintage, 1978), p. 139Google Scholar ; On the overlaps between Arendt's writing on the social and Foucault's account of biopolitics see Braun, Kathrin, ‘Biopolitics and Temporality in Arendt and Foucault’, Time and Society, 16 (2007), pp. 5–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; Duarte, André, ‘Hannah Arendt, Biopolitics, and the Problem of Violence: From animal laborans to homo sacer’, in King, Richard H. and Stone, Dan (eds), Hannah Arendt and the Uses of History: Imperialism, Nation, Race, and Genocide (Oxford: Berghahn, 2007), pp. 191–204Google Scholar .

72 Grayson, ‘Human Security as Power/Knowledge’, p. 395.

73 Arendt, , The Promise of Politics, p. 145Google Scholar .

74 Pritchard, Colin and Taylor, Richard K. S., Social Work: Reform or Revolution (London: Routledge, 1978), p. 1Google Scholar .

75 Pierson, Christopher, Beyond the Welfare State? The New Political Economy of Welfare (Cambridge: Polity, 2006)Google Scholar .

76 See, for example, Prakash, Gayan, ‘The Colonial Genealogy of Society: Community and Political Modernity in India’, in Joyce, Patrick (ed.), The Social in Question: New Bearings in History and the Social Sciences (London: Routledge, 2002), pp. 81–96Google Scholar .

77 Rose, ‘the Death of the Social?’, p. 330.

78 Arendt, , Human Condition, p. 29Google Scholar .

79 Ibid., p. 87.

80 Ibid., p. 40.

81 Ibid., p. 45.

82 Ibid., p. 87.

83 Ibid., p. 93.

84 Ibid., p. 40.

85 As Gilles Deleuze also observed, the social ‘leads to a new hybrid form of the public and the private, and itself produces a repartition, a novel interlacing of interventions and withdrawals of the state’. Deleuze, ‘Foreword’, p. x. Similarly, for Foucault, liberalism exists ‘not from the existence of the state … but rather from society, which is in a complex relation of exteriority and interiority with respect to the state’. Foucault, , Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth, ed. Rabinow, Paul (New York: New Press, 1997), p. 75Google Scholar .

86 Castel, , From Manual Workers to Wage Laborers, pp. 16–17Google Scholar .

87 Arendt, , Men in Dark Times (New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World, 1968), p. 155Google Scholar .

88 Ibid.

89 Arendt, , Human Condition, p. 254Google Scholar ; Ring, Jennifer‘On Needing Both Marx and Arendt: Alienation and the Flight from Inwardness’, Political Theory, 17 (1989), pp. 432–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

90 Arendt, , Human Condition, p. 257Google Scholar .

91 Ibid.

92 Duffield, Development, Security and Unending War.

93 For a fuller discussion see Owens, , ‘The Supreme Social Concept: The Un-worldliness of Modern Security’, New Formations, 71 (2011), pp. 14–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

94 Arendt, , Between Past and Future, p. 207Google Scholar .

95 Arendt, , Promise of Politics, p. 176Google Scholar .

96 Arendt, , Human Condition, p. 43Google Scholar .