Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-68ccn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-15T23:58:51.791Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Overseas companies as transnational actors during the European conquest of Africa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 October 2009

Stephen Cooney
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

“William, when I went into the jungle, I was seventeen. When I walked out I was twenty-one. And, by God, I was rich!”

Arthur Miller, Death of a Salesman, Act I

Fortunes magically and mysteriously made on vast continents overseas have tempted western entrepreneurs for generations, much as Uncle Ben tempted Willie Loman. But these exploits also involve machinations which appear sinister to a general public increasingly disturbed by the control giant corporations have over our daily lives. As long ago as 1900, John Hobson developed the theory that modern imperial expansion was the product of the manipulation of national foreign policies by the “Rand lords” and similar overseas financial operators. This idea was used by Lenin, Hilferding and others in their elaborations of the Marxist explanation of the nexus between economic forces and the political behaviour of states. Imperialism in tropical Africa was always seen as a key issue in this context. With the onset of decolonization and the struggle for development, questions of the history and the progress of imperialism have remained cogent subjects of intellectual controversy. The historical “scramble for Africa” and the process of colonization which followed created the basis for the modern political map of Africa and modern African political society. To what extent were these developments triggered or determined by the activities of private entrepeneurs? What relevance might the answer have for the contemporary study of international politics? This article seeks to explore these questions in the light of theories of transnational politics. At the same time, the problem of European expansion in Africa provides an important test for the transnational approach, as it relates to the overseas political activity of international business firms.

Type
Research Article
Information
Review of International Studies , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , July 1980 , pp. 154 - 179
Copyright
Copyright © British International Studies Association 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 154 note 1 Hobson, John A., Imperialism: A study (London, 1938), chs. 1–6.Google Scholar

page 154 note 2 Winslow, E. M., ‘Marxian, Liberal and Sociological Theories of Imperialism’, Journal of Political Economy, xxxix (1931), pp. 713–372Google Scholar; Kemp, Tom, Theories of Imperialism (London,1967), pp. 30–35Google Scholar. pp. 115–53; Brown, Michael Barratt, ‘A Critique of Marxist Theories of Imperialism’, in Owen, R. and Sutcliffe, B. (eds.), Studies in the Theory of Imperialism (London, 1972), pp. 47–54Google Scholar; Stokes, Eric, ‘Late Nineteenth Century Colonial Expansion and the Attack on Economic Imperialism: A Case of Mistaken Identity?’ Historical Journal, xii (1969), pp. 285–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 155 note 1 Examples of concentration on these areas are: Huntigton, Samuel P., ‘Transnational Organizations in World Polities’, World Politics, xxv (1975), pp. 347–68Google Scholar; Vernon, Raymond, Sovereignty at Bay; The Multinational Spread of U.S. Enterprises (New York, 1971)Google Scholar; Feld, Werner, Non-Governmental Forces and World Politics (New York, 1972)Google Scholar; Strange, Susan, ‘The Study of Transnational Relations’, International Affairs, lii (1976), pp. 333–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 155 note 2 Nye, Joseph S., Jr. and Keohane, Robert O., ‘Transnational Relations and World Politics: An Introduction’, in Nye and Keohane (eds.), Transnational Relations and World Politics, issued as International Organization, xxv (1971), pp. 329–36.Google Scholar

page 155 note 3 For an example of the latter, cf. Ivan Vallier, ‘The Roman Catholic Church as a Transnational Actor’, in Nye and Keohane, op. cit. pp. 479–502.

page 156 note 1 Singer, J. David, ‘The Global System and Its Subystems: A Developmental View’, in Rosenau, James N. (ed.), Linkage Politics (New York, 1969), pp. 21–43.Google Scholar

page 156 note 2 Nye and Keohane, ‘Transnational Relations and World Politics: A Conclusion’, in Nye and Keohane, op. cit. pp. 729–36.

page 156 note 3 Robert Gilpin, “The Politics of Transnational Economic Relations’, in Nye and Keohane, op. cit.

page 156 note 4 Gilpin, Robert, ‘The Political Economy of the Multinational Corporation: Three Contrasting Perspectives’, American Political Science Review, lxx (1976), pp. 184–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 157 note 1 Nye and Keohane, op. cit. ‘Transnational Relations: Conclusion’, pp. 734–36.

page 157 note 2 Vernon, op. cit. 4–5.

page 157 note 3 Hopkins, A. G., ‘Imperial Business in Africa, Part 2: Interpretations’, Journal ofAfrican History, xvii (1976), pp. 279–84.Google Scholar

page 158 note 1 Among the major states of western Europe before 1880 there was a general informal acceptance of British naval and political superiority in Africa matters; Sanderson, G. N., ‘The European Partition of Africa: Coincidence or Conjuncture?’ in Penrose, E. F. (ed.), European Imperialism and the Partition of Africa (London, 1975), pp. 17–44Google Scholar. Surveys stressing the importance of local factors in imperial expansion in this era are Fieldhouse, D. K., Economics and Empire, 1830–1914. (London, 1973), pp. 76–87Google Scholar, 126–45; Galbraith, John S., ‘The “TurbulentFrontier” as a Factor in British Expansion’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, ii (1960), pp. 163–68Google Scholar; Newbury, Colin W., ‘Trade and Authority in West Africa from 1850 to 1880’, in Gann, L. H. and Duignan, Peter (eds.), Colonialism in Africa, 1870–1960, I (Cambridge, 1969), pp. 76–94.Google Scholar

page 158 note 2 The humanitarian interest of missionaries was important also, but this was usually connected with the idea ofintroducing ‘legitimate' trade Cf. esp. Oliver, Roland, The Missionary Factor in East Africa (London, 1952), pp. 9–12Google Scholar, 35–44.

page 158 note 3 For provocative and interesting overviews Cf. Hopkins, 274–79; and Amin, Samir, ‘Underdevelopment and Dependence in Black Africa: Origins and Contemporary Forms’, Journal of Modern African Studies, x (1972), pp. 503–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar. More detailed studies are in Gann, and Duignan, (eds.), IV, The Economics of Colonialism (Cambridge, 1975)Google Scholar, but these generally emphasize the colonial era.

page 158 note 4 Brunschwig, Henri, L'avenement de l' Afrique noire, du XlXème siècle à nos jours (Paris, 1963)Google Scholar, ch. 7; Newbury, ‘Trade and Authority in West Africa’, pp.66–76; Hargreaves, John D., Prelude to the Partition of West Africa (London, 1963)Google Scholar, ch. 1.

page 158 note 5 Müller, Fritz Ferdinand, Deutschland-Zanzibar-Ostafrika; Geschichte einer deutscher Kolonial eroberung, 1884–1890 (East Berlin, 1959), pp. 85–95Google Scholar; Sir Coupland, Reginald, The Exploitation of East Africa, 1856–1890 (London, 1939)Google Scholar, ch. 12; Robinson, Ronald and Gallagher, John, Africa and the Victorians: The Official Mind of Imperialism (London, 1961), pp. 44–51.Google Scholar

page 159 note 1 Galbraith, loc, cit.; , C. W. de Kiewet, The Imperial Factor in South Africa (Cambridge, 1937)Google Scholar, ch. 2; Atmore, A. and Marks, S., ‘The Imperial Factor in South Africa in the Nineteenth Century: Towards a Reassessment’, in Penrose op. cit. pp. 105–39.Google Scholar

page 159 note 2 Barnet, Richard J. and Muller, Ronald E., Global Reach: The Power of the Multinational Corporation (London, 1975), pp 133–47.Google Scholar

page 159 note 3 Ibid. pp. 72–92; Gilpin, ‘Transnational Economic Relations’, op. cit. pp. 403–13; Magdoff, Harry, The Age of Imperialism: The Economics of the U.S. Foreign Policy (New York, 1969), pp. 40–62Google Scholar, 173–202. The concept of “fused” objectives is taken from Rosecrance, Richard N., International Relations: Peace or War? (New York, 1973), pp. 66–69.Google Scholar

page 161 note 1 Cf. David Easton's dictum that “politics”, formally defined, relates only to decisions which are authoritative for a whole society; The Political System (New York, 1953), pp. 126–28.Google Scholar

page 162 note 1 I would, for example, question the methodology of Michael Brecher and his associates, when they use the public statements offoreign ministry officials to test their framework for the analysis of foreign policy decision making: Brecher, Michael, Steinberg, Blema and Stein, Janice, ‘A Framework for Research on Foreign Policy Behaviour’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, xiii (1969), pp. 88–101.Google Scholar

page 162 note 2 On the African role in the partition of Africa, some particularly suggestive ideas are presented by Ronald Robinson, ‘Non-European Foundations of European Imperialism: Sketch for a Theory of Collaboration’, in Owen and Sutcliffe, op. cit. pp. 118–32; Cf. also, Newbury, Goling W., The Western Slave Coast and Its Rulers (Oxford, 1961)Google Scholar, passim. and, Hargreaves, John, West Africa Partitioned, I, The Loaded Pause, 1885–89 (London, 1972)Google Scholar, Ch. 1.

page 163 note 1 Slade, Ruth, King Leopold's Congo (London, 1956), pp. 23–43Google Scholar; Stengers, Jean, ‘King Leopold and Anglo-French Rivalry, 1882–1884,' Gifford, Prosser and Louis, W. R. (eds.), France and Britain in Africa (New Haven, Yale University Press, 1971)., pp. 121–32.Google Scholar

page 163 note 2 Fr. Auguste Roeykens, Leopold II et la conference geographique de Bruxelles (1876), chs. 1–2, 4; Le dessein africain de Leopold II: Nouvelles recherches sur sa genese et sa nature (1875–1876), ch. 3: and, La période initiate de l'oeuvre africaine de Leopold II … (1875–1883), chs. 1–3 (all published by Brussels: Academie Royale des Sciences Coloniales, 1956–7); also Brunschwig, Henri, French Colonialism 1871–1gi4: Myths and Realities (London, 1966), pp. 30–43.Google Scholar

page 164 note 1 Slade, 171–74; Jean Stengers, ‘The Congo Free State and the Belgian Congo Before 1914’, in Gann and Duignan, op. cit. I, pp. 262–64, 266–71, 278, 280–82. Cf. also the treatment of this system in Conrad's Heart of Darkness.

page 164 note 2 Jean Stengers, ‘King Leopold's Imperialism’, in Owen and Sutcliffe, op. cit. pp. 272–75; Slade, op. cit. pp. 175–78.

page 164 note 3 Stengers, ‘King Leopold's Imperialism,' op. cit. pp. 259–76; and, ‘Leopold and Anglo-French Rivalry’, pp. 121–32; Roeykens, Conference de Bruxelles, Ch. 2 and, Dessein africain, 1–2 esp. pp. 20–28.

page 164 note 4 Slade, op. cit. pp. 193–99.

page 165 note 1 Ibid, pp. 203–10.

page 165 note 2 Ibid. pp. 178–92, 199–210; Stengers, ‘Congo Free State’, op. cit. pp. 266–71, 280–82, 287–90; Porter, Bernard, Critics of Empire (London, 1968), pp. 260–74.Google Scholar

page 165 note 3 Roeykens, Conference de Bruxelles, op. cit. pp. 47–55, 109–93; Stengers, ‘Congo Free op. cit. pp. 264–66, 279–80.

page 166 note 1 Stengers, ‘Leopold and Anglo-French Rivalry’, op. cit. pp. 132–65; Crowe, Stephanie, The Berlin West African Conference, 1884.–1885 (London, 1942)Google Scholar, pt. 1: chs. 1–2, p. 8; pt. 2: chs. 2, pp. 4–5; Power, Thomas F., Jr., Jules Ferry and the Renaissance of French Imperialism (New York, 1944), pp. 92–115; Brunschwig, Myths and Realities, op. cit. pp. 43–48, 65–74; Slade, op. cit. ch. 3.Google Scholar

page 166 note 2 The most complete discussions of Leopold's Nile strategy are in: Sanderson, G. N., England, Europe and the Upper Nile, 1882–1889 (Edinburgh, 1965), chs 5–6Google Scholar; Collins, Robert O., The Southern Sudan, 1883–1898: A Strugglefor Control (New Haven, 1962), chs. 3–5Google Scholar; and, King Leopold, England and the Upper Mile, 1899–1909 (New Haven, 1968), Passim, Cf. also Blanchard, Marcel, ‘Francais et Beiges sur l'Oubanghi (1890–1896)’, Revue d'histoire des colonies, xxxvi (1950), pp. 1–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and, Stengers, ‘Congo Free State’, op. cit. pp. 274–78, 284–87.

page 167 note 1 Robinson, Ronald and Gallagher, John vi, ‘The Imperialism of Free Trade’, Economic History Review, (1953), pp. 1–5Google Scholar; Gf. also their Africa and the Victorians, op. cit. chs. 1–2.

page 167 note 2 Platt, D. G. M., Finance, Trade and Politics in British Foreign Policy, 1815–1914 (Oxford, 1968), esp. pp. 54–48Google Scholar; and, ‘Imperialism and Free Trade: Some Reservations’, Economic History Review, xxxi (1968), pp. 296–306Google Scholar. For an older statement of this view, cf. Feis, Herbert, Europe, The World's Banker, 1870–1914 (New Haven, 1930)Google Scholar, ch. 4.

page 167 note 3 For general summaries of this threat, cf.: Gilpin, ‘Transnational Economic Relations’, op. cit. pp. 403–8; Lowe, G. J., The Reluctant Imperialists, I, British Foreign Policy, 1878–1902 (London, 1967), pp. 1–5Google Scholar; Stengers, Jean, ‘L'imperialisme colonial de la fin du XIXe siecle: mythe ou realite?’; Journal ofAfrican History, iii (1962), pp. 483–87Google Scholar; Platt, D. C. M., ‘Economic Factors British Policy During the New Imperialism’, Past and Present, no. 39 (April, 1968), pp. 120–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar. The strategic threat is discussed in Lowe, chs. 2–4, and Hinsley, F. H., ‘International Rivalry in the Colonial Sphere, 1869–1885’, in Rose, J. H., et. al. (eds.), Cambridge History of British Empire, III, The Empire-Commonwealth, 1870–1919, (hereafter CHBE) (Cambridge, 1959), pp. 117–26.Google Scholar

page 167 note 4 This view is summarized in ch. 15.

page 167 note 5 Cf. esp. Louis, W. R., ‘Sir Percy Anderson's Grand African Strategy, 1883–1896’, English Historical Review, lxxxi (1966), pp. 292–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Also, Marais, J. S., The Fall of Kruger's Republic (Oxford, 1961), p. 325Google Scholar; Gillard, D. R., ‘Salisbury's African Policy: The Heligoland Offer of 1890’, English Historical Review, lxxv (1960), pp. 631–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and, ‘Salisbury's Heligo-land Offer: The Case Against the “Witu” Thesis’, English Historical Review, lxxx (1965), PP. 538–62; Newbury, Colin W., ‘Victorians, Republicans and the Partition of West Africa’, Journal of African History, iii (1962), pp. 493–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 168 note 1 Flint, John E., Sir George Goldie and the Making of Modern Nigeria (London, 1961)Google Scholar, Ch. 3.

page 168 note 2 Ibid. pp. 62–98; Robinson and Gallagher, Africa and the Victorians, op. cit. pp. 175–89; Platt, op. cit. Trade, Finance and Politics, pp. 251–56; Hargreaves, Loaded Pause, op. cit. pp. 93–111. Crowe, op. cit. pt. 2: Chs. 2 and 6.

page 168 note 3 Newbury, Colin W., ‘The Development of French Policy on the Lower and Upper Niger, 1880–1898’, Journal of Modem History, xxxi (1959), pp. 18–24Google Scholar; Flint, Goldie, op. cit. 34–41. 62–71.

page 169 note 1 Blanchard, Marcel, ‘Français et Anglais au Niger (1890–1898)’, Le Monde Francais, xii (1948), pp. 409–23Google Scholar, and (1949), pp. 73–83; Robinson and Gallagher, op. cit. Africa and the Victorians, pp. 402–9; Flint, Goldie, op. cit. chs. 10–13; and, ‘Nigeria: The Colonial Experience from 1880 to 1914/ in Gann and Duignan, I, op, cit. pp. 238–42.

page 169 note 2 Ibid. pp. 220–38 and Flint, Goldie, op. cit. pp. 48–71, 98–155, 187–215.

page 169 note 3 Gf. sources in fn. 43; also, Robinson and Gallagher, Africa and the Victorians, op. cit. pp. 395–402; and, Strauss, William L., Joseph Chamberlain and the Theory of Imperialism (Washington, 1942), pp. 80–85Google Scholar, 89–92.

page 169 note 4 Lockhart, J. G. and Wodehouse, G. M., Rhodes (London, 1963), pp. 106–22Google Scholar, 169–73; Galbraith, John S., Crown and Charter: The Early Tears of the British South Africa Company (Berkeley, 1974)Google Scholar, ch. 8.

page 170 note 1 On Rhodes' personal motives, cf. esp. the remarks in Lockhart and Wodehouse, op. cit. pp. 67–70, 80–105, 132–57.

page 170 note 2 Galbraith, op. cit. Crown and Charter, chs. 2–4; Robinson and Gallagher, Africa and the Victorians, op. cit. pp. 202–45; Lockhart and Wodehouse, ch. 10; Oliver, Roland, Sir Harry Johnston and the Scramblefor Africa (London, 1957), pp. 133–72.Google Scholar

page 170 note 3 Lockhart and Wodehouse, op. cit. pp. 219–33; Robinson and Gallagher, Africa and the Victorians, op. cit. pp. 245–48; Galbraith, Crown and Charter, op. cit. ch. 6.

page 170 note 4 Ibid. pp. 240–54; Slade, op. cit. pp. 128–40; Lockhart and Wodehouse, op. cit. pp. 241–44.

page 170 note 5 Galbraith, Crown and Charter, op. cit. pp. 106–27,199–200, 310–39.

page 171 note 1 Cf. sources in fn. 49.

page 171 note 2 Louis, W. R., ‘Great Britain and German Expansion in Africa, 1884–1914’, in Gifford, Prosser and Louis, W. R. (eds.), Britain and Germany in Africa (New Haven, 1967), pp. 19–30Google Scholar; Marais, op. cit. pp. 46–95; Robinson and Gallagher, Africa and the Victorians, op. cit. pp. 410–30; Lockhart and Wodehouse, op. cit. chs. 17–20, 23; Madden, A. F., ‘Changing Attitudes and Widening Responsibilities’, CHBE, op. cit. pp. 356–59.Google Scholar

page 171 note 3 Discussions of the motives behind government policy are in: Robinson and Gallagher, Africa and the Victorians, op. cit. pp. 189–202, 290–300; Sanderson, op. cit. chs. 2–3; Lowe, op. cit pp. 127–37; and, the Gillard articles cited in fn. 39. On IBEA performance and British policy: Robinson and Gallagher, Africa and the Victorians, op. cit. ch. 11; James, Robert Rhodes, Rosebery (London, 1963), pp. 253–83Google Scholar; Oliver, Missionary Factor, op: cit. pp. 128–62; Galbraith, John S., Mackinnon and East Africa, 1878–1895 (Cambridge, 1972).Google Scholar

page 172 note 1 For examples, cf.: Guillen, Pierre, ‘Les milieux d'affaires français et le Maroc a l'aube du XXe siècle: la fondation de la Gompagnie Marocaine’, Revue historique (1965), pp. 397–422Google Scholar; and ‘L'implantation de Schneider au Maroc: les debuts de la Gompagnie Marocaine (1902–1906)’, Revue d'histoire diplomatique (1965), pp. 113–68; Ganiage, Jean, Les origines du protectorat français en Tunisie, 1861–1881 (Paris, 1959)Google Scholar, passim.

page 172 note 2 Catherine Coquery-Vidrovitch, ‘French Colonization in Africa to 1920: Administration and Economic Development’, in Gann and Duignan,op cit.. pp. 177–94; Sieberg, Herward, Eugène Etienne und die franzöische Kolonialpolitik, 1887–1904 (Cologne, 1968), pp. 77–90Google Scholar: Suret-Canale, Jean, Afrique noire occidentale et centrale, II (Paris, 1961)Google Scholar, ch. 1.

page 172 note 3 Newbury, ‘Trade and Authority in West Africa’, op. cit. pp. 76–94: and, ‘The Tariff Factor in Anglo-French African Partition’, in Gifford and Louis (eds.), France and Britain in Africa, op. cit. pp. 221–30, 254–59; Suret-Canale, op. cit. pp. 19–22.

page 173 note 1 Hargreaves, Prelude to Partition, op. cit. pp. 271–78; Flint Goldie, op. cit. pp. 34–41, 62–71; Newbury, ‘French Policy on Niger’, op. cit. pp. 18–24.

page 173 note 2 Hargreaves, Prelude to Partition, op. cit. pp. 93–101, 110–20, 201–14; Coquery, Catherine, ‘Le blocus de Whydah (1876–1977) et la rivalité franco-anglaise au Dahomey’, Cahiers d'etudes africaines, ii (1962), pp. 386–409.Google Scholar

page 173 note 3 Atgér, Paul, La France en Côte d'lvoire de 1843 á 1893 (Dakar, 1962), pts. 2–3Google Scholar; Chaput, J., ‘Treich-Laplene et la naissance de la Côte d'lvoire francaise’, Revue d'histoire des colonies, xxxvi (1949), pp. 87–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Sieberg, op. cit. pp. 58–64.

page 174 note 1 Townsend, Mary Evelyn, The Rise and Fall of the German Colonial Empire, 1884–1918 (New York, 1930), pp. 124–27Google Scholar; Henderson, W. O., Studies in German Colonial History (London, 1962), pp. 11–12Google Scholar; Brunschwig, Henri, Vexpansion allemande outre-mer, du XVe siècle à nos jours (Paris, 1957), PP. 127–31.Google Scholar

page 174 note 2 Wehler, Hans-Ulrich, Bismarck und der Imperialismus (Cologne, 1969), pp. 298–315Google Scholar; Rudin, Harry R., Germans in the Cameroons, 1884–1914 (New Haven, 1938), pp. 17–75Google Scholar, 120–126; Hargreaves, Prelude to Partition, op. cit. pp. 303–21.

page 175 note 1 Müller, op. cit. pp. 80–85, 115–60; Brunschwig, Expansion allemande, op. cit. pp. 78–79; Wehler, op. cit. pp. 333–58.

page 175 note 2 Ibid. pp. 333–43; Müller, op. cit. pp. 97–133.

page 175 note 3 Ibid. pp. 134–42.

page 175 note 4 On Peters5 general strategy, cf. Müller, ch. 6. On the Uganda question and Peters' “Emin Pasha” expedition, cf. Wehler, op. cit. pp. 364–67; Lowe, op. cit. pp. 128–32; Müller op. cit. pp. 458–84; Sanderson, Upper Nile, op. cit. ch. 3.

page 176 note 1 Müller, op. cit. chs. 6–8, pp. 11–16; Wehler, op. cit. pp. 343–64; Henderson, op. cit. pp. 12–21; Townsend, op. cit. pp. 130–41.

page 176 note 2 Cf. Wehler, op. cit. pp. 263–81, 292–98, 328–33,367–72; and, Müller, op. cit, pp. 287–356, 384–87, for dicsussions ofsuch enterprises. The most important was F.A.E. Luderitz' company in Southwest Africa, which formed the basis of the German colony there.

page 178 note 1 Turner, Louis, ‘The Oil Majors in World Politics,’ International Affairs, iii (1976), pp. 368–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 178 note 2 Cf. The discussion of this subject in Barnet and Muller, op. cit. chs. 7–8, and Galtung, Johan, ‘A Structural Theory of Imperialism’, Journal ofPeace Research, viii (1971), pp. 81–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 179 note 1 Barnet and Muller, op, cit. chs. 3 and 5.

page 179 note 2 Vernon seems to agree with this view in the British, French and Japanese cases, but not in the American case, pp. 205–30. However, cf. Barnet and Muller, op, cit. pp. 72–81, and Magdoff, passim.