Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T19:00:31.226Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Between Confucianism and Democracy: A Response to Sungmoon Kim

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2019

Zhuoyao Li
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Research Article
Information
The Review of Politics , Volume 81 , Issue 3 , Summer 2019 , pp. 493 - 497
Copyright
Copyright © University of Notre Dame 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Ferrara, Alessandro, The Democratic Horizon: Hyperpluralism and the Renewal of Political Liberalism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 Ibid., 100.

3 Kim, Sungmoon, “Pragmatic Confucian Democracy: Rethinking the Value of Democracy in East Asia,” Journal of Politics 79, no. 1 (Jan. 2017): 241CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 Li, Zhuoyao, “The Discontents of Moderate Political Confucianism and the Future of Democracy in East Asia,” Philosophy East & West 68, no. 4 (Oct. 2018): 1193–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 Page 468–469.

6 I am using Kim's terminology here. A Confucian classicist is someone who is devoted to the exposition and (re)interpretation of Confucian classics and commentaries. See Kim, Sungmoon, “Public Reason Confucianism: A Construction,” American Political Science Review 109, no. 1 (Feb. 2015): 199CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7 Rawls, John, Political Liberalism, expanded ed. (New York: Columbia University Press, 2005), 36Google Scholar.