¹ Cf. Kamenka, E., “Political Nationalism: The Evolution of an Idea” in Nationalism, ed. Kamenka, E. (London, 1976), p. 3.Google Scholar

² Kedourie, , Nationalism (London, 1961), p. 9Google Scholar. Brougham in 1848 referred to that “new fangled notion of nationalism” (Letter to the Marquis of Lansdowne quoted in Intellectuals and Politics, ed. Kamenka, E. and Smith, F. [London, 1979], p. 100).Google Scholar

³ Ferguson, , Essay on the History of Civil Society (1767), ed. Forbes, D. (Edinburgh, 1966), p. 10.Google Scholar

⁴ Hume, , Essays: Moral, Political and Literary (Oxford, 1963), p. 203.Google Scholar

⁵ Disc. II, chap. 7, ed. Christian, P. (Paris, 1943), p. 57.Google Scholar

⁶ Berliner Politisches Wochenblatt quoted in Meinecke, F.Cosmopolitanism and the National State, trans. Kimber, R. (Princeton, 1970), p. 176.Google Scholar

⁷ Bentham, , Works, ed. Bowring, J. (Edinburgh, 1959), I:171–94Google Scholar. This essay was first published in French by Dumont.

⁸ Herder, , “Yet Another Philosophy of History” in Herder on Social and Political Culture, ed. and trans. Barnard, F. (Cambridge, 1969), p. 186Google Scholar. Sämmtliche Werke, ed. Suphan, B. (Berlin, 1877), 5:509.Google Scholar

⁹ The immediate target for Herder's remarks was I. Iselin who stated in an addition to the introduction of his Über die Geschichte der Menschheit (1764) that his leading idea was “the progress of mankind from external simplicity to an ever-higher degree of light and pros perity” (5th ed. [Basel, 1786], p. xxxv)Google Scholar. Herder's reference to “happiness” is a direct allusion to Iselin.

¹⁰ Herder, , Reisejournal 1767 in Werke, 4:472.Google Scholar

¹¹ It is true that in his later work Herder endeavors through his concept of Humanität to relate such diversity to a cosmic plan, but he continued to affirm that one culture cannot meaningfully judge another. For his realization that cultures were discrete and thus not to be placed on unilinear path, Cassirer called him “the Copernicus of History” (The Problem of Knowledge, trans. Woglom, W. and Hendel, C. [New Haven, 1950], p. 208Google Scholar) while Meinecke saw him as “perhaps” like Columbus in that he discovered a new world (Historismus) without fully realizing it (Die Entstehung des Historismus, 2nd ed. [Munich, 1946], p. 466Google Scholar; and Dilthey saw Herder's thought as transcending the limits of the eigh teenth century and leading directly to the Romantics and Hegel (Das Achtzehnte Jahrhundert und die Geschichtliche Welt in Gesammelte Schriften [Stuttgart, 1959], 3:268Google Scholar). More generally, Lovejoy, A. held that “the substitution of what may be called diversitarianism for uniformitarianism” common to romantic thought “constituted a profound and momentous change in values” (Great Chain of Being [New York, 1960], p. 293–94).Google Scholar

¹² Hume, , Enquiry Concerning the Human Understanding (1748), ed. Hendel, C. (Indianapolis, 1955), pp. 92, 93.Google Scholar

¹³ Cf. Condillac, , Essai sur l'origine des connaissances humaines (1746), pt. 2, sect. 1, chap. 1.Google Scholar

¹⁴ Fichte, , Addresses to the German Nation, ed. Kelly, G., trans. Jones, R. and Turnbull, G. (New York, 1968), p. 190.Google Scholar

¹⁵ Burke, , “First Letter on a Regicide Peace” (1796) in Works (London, 1882), 5:220.Google Scholar

¹⁶ Mandelbaum, , History, Man and Reason (Baltimore, 1971), p. 42.Google Scholar

¹⁷ Meinecke, , Historismus.Google Scholar

¹⁸ Hobbes, , Leviathan (Everyman Library, London, 1959), chap. 30, p. 179.Google Scholar

¹⁹ Pocock, , The Machiavellian Moment (Princeton, 1979)Google Scholar. On Harrington in particular see his introduction to Harrington's Political Writings (Cambridge, 1977).Google Scholar

²⁰ The above is gleaned from Burke, 's Reflections on the Revolution in France (1790) in Works, 2:359, 348, 282, 359, 368, 367.Google Scholar

²¹ Hume believes that through the operation of custom “antiquity always begets the opinion of right” (“First Principles of Government” [1741] in Essays, p. 30Google Scholar); and government is “sanctified by time” (History of Great Britain: James I and Charles I [1754], ed. Forbes, D. [Harmondsworth, 1970], p. 225Google Scholar). Hume also explicitly enunciates the doctrine of prescription whereby long possession conveys “the title to any object” (Treaties of Human Nature [1739–1740], ed. Selby-Bigge, L. [Oxford, 1946], p. 508Google Scholar). A point of practical importance for Hume holds that it applies to the Hanoverian succession (“Of the Protestant Succession” [1752] in Essays, p. 498Google Scholar).

²² Burke, , Works, 2:435.Google Scholar

²³ Burke, to CaptMercer, , 26 02 1790Google Scholar, Correspondence, ed. Cobban, A. and Smith, R. (Cambridge, 1967), 6:95.Google Scholar

²⁴ Lucas, , “On Edmund Burke's Doctrine of Prescription,” Historical Journal, 9 (1968), 35–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

²⁵ Burke, , “Speech into the State of Representation of the Commons in Parliament” (1782), Works, 6:146–47.Google Scholar

²⁶ Schlegel, , Werke (Kritische-Ausgabe) (Munich, 1964), 6:15.Google Scholar

²⁷ Ibid., 7:141.

²⁸ Fichte, , Addresses, p. 184.Google Scholar

²⁹ Schlegel, , Werkt, 13:145.Google Scholar

³⁰ Savigny, , History of Roman Law, 2nd ed. (Heidelberg, 1834), 1:21.Google Scholar

³¹ “On the vocation of our age” (1814), trans. Hayward, A. in Reiss, H. in Political Thought of the German Romantics (Oxford, 1955), esp. p. 206.Google Scholar

³² As cited in Kohn, H., Prelude to Nation-States (Princeton, 1967), p. 293.Google Scholar

³³ Schlegel, , Werke, 13:144.Google Scholar

³⁴ Sieyes, , What Is the Third Estate? trans. Blondel, M. (London, 1963), p. 58.Google Scholar

³⁵ As cited in Kohn, , Nation-States, p. 92.Google Scholar

³⁶ Eichendorff, , Über die Folgen von der Aufhenbung der Landeshoheit der Bischöfe und der Kloster in DeutschlandGoogle Scholar as quoted in Lougee, R., “German Romanticism and Political Thought,” Review of Politics 21 (1959), 636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

³⁷ Cf. the extract from Die Elemente der Staatskunst (1809)Google Scholar in Reiss, , Political Thought;Google Scholar and Berry, C. J., “From Hume to Hegel: The Case of the Social Contract,” Journal of History of Ideas, 38 (1977), 691–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

³⁸ Fichte, , Addresses, p. 48.Google Scholar

³⁹ Cf. Meinecke, , Cosmopolitanism, p. 100ff.Google Scholar

⁴⁰ Cf. Love, W. D., “Burke's Idea of the Body Corporate,” Review of Politics, 23 (1961), 203–229.Google Scholar

⁴¹ Cf. inter alia Beck, L. W., Early German Philosophy (Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1969)Google Scholar, chap. 15; Spitz, L., “Natural Law and the Theory of History in Herder,” Journal of History of Ideas, 16 (1955), 453–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Stamm, I., “Herder and the Aufklärung,” Germanic Review, 38 (1963), 197–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Lovejoy, , Great Chain of Being, chap. 9.Google Scholar

⁴² Herder, , “Ideas for a Philosophy of History”Google Scholar in Barnard, , Herder, p. 324Google Scholar; Werke, 13:384.Google Scholar

⁴³ Cf. Kantorowicz, H., “Volksgeist und Historische Rechtsschule,” Historische Zeitschrift, 108 (1912), 295–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁴⁴ Kant, , Critique of Judgment, trans. Barnard, J. (London, 1892), pp. 326, 277.Google Scholar

⁴⁵ Schlegel, , Werfe, 7:146.Google Scholar