Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T03:12:25.982Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Political Thought in an Intercivilizational Perspective: A Critical Reflection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2008

Jürgen Gebhardt
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the light of the emerging global ecumene there is an ongoing intellectual discourse that focuses on the quest for a reorientation of political theorizing. It challenges the more or less canonized approaches to the understanding of political life and thought that dominate Western mainstream political and social science. This essay critically explores the epistemological assumptions underlying the prevalent paradigm of socio-political analysis, and points out its weakness in coming to grips with the multi-civilizational cosmos of human self-understanding which makes up the historico-political world. It argues that a genuine hermeneutical science is needed in order to restate the meaningful pattern of human self-interpretation across cultures and civilizations in its historical depth and global reach. It takes as its starting point the rise of the great civilizations in the axial times and their respective visions of order which still shape modernity. These post-axial visions, various as they were in appearance and content, merged with political power to provide the meaning-creating symbolic forms of societal self-understanding, thus providing society with a logic of order. This essay defines the common ground of the intercivilizational modality of human existence in history and society as the proper subject of comparative political theorizing, insofar as it intends to bring to our attention the essence of the political in all of its historical modalities.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Review of Politics , Volume 70 , Issue 1: Special Issue on Comparative Political Theory , Winter 2008 , pp. 5 - 22
Copyright
Copyright © University of Notre Dame 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Parekh, Bhikhu, The Philosophy of Political Philosophy (Hull: Hull University Press, 1986), 12, 19Google Scholar.

2 Taylor, Charles, Philosophy and Human Sciences—Philosophical Papers II (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985), 125, 131CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 Dallmayr, Fred, “Beyond Monologue: For a Comparative Political Theory,” Perspectives on Politics 2, no. 2 (2004): 249–57, 249CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 Weber, Max, Aufsätze zur Religionssoziologie, vol. 1 (Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr, 1972), 2Google Scholar.

5 Weber, Max, Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre (Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr, 1968), 158, 212–14Google Scholar.

6 Turgot, Anne-Robert-Jacques, Œuvres, vol. 2 (Paris: Belin, 1809)Google Scholar.

7 Eisenstadt, Shmuel Noah, Power, Trust, and Meaning (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1995), 335ffGoogle Scholar.

8 Eisenstadt, Shmuel Noah, “Modernity in Socio-historical Perspective,” in Comparing Modernities, ed. Ben-Rafael, Eliezer and Sternberg, Yitzhak (Leiden: Brill, 2005), 31–56, 44–45Google Scholar.

9 Matthes, Joachim, “Über die Erfahrung der Erfahrung,” in Enteignen und die Wissenschaften, ed. Schneider, H.J., Inhetveen, R., and Fink, Wilhelm (München: Verlag, 1992), 101–24, 106–7Google Scholar.

10 Dallmayr, Fred, “Introduction: Toward a Comparative Political Theory,” Review of Politics 59 (Summer 1997): 421–27, 422CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

11 Voegelin, Eric, The Collected Works, vol. 17, Order and History 4, The Ecumenic Age (Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 2000), 106, 373Google Scholar.

12 Voegelin, Eric, The Collected Works, vol. 15, Order and History 2, The World of the Polis (Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 2000), 68Google Scholar.

13 Jaspers, Karl, Ursprung und Ziel der Geschichte (Zuerich: Artemis, 1949), 15Google Scholar.

14 Shmuel Noah Eisenstadt, Modernity in Socio-Historical Perspective, 32–33.

15 Voegelin, Eric, Collected Works, vol. 6, Anamnesis (Columbia: University Missouri Press, 2002), 334–35Google Scholar.

16 Dallmayr, Fred, “Polis and Cosmopolis,” in Comparative Political Culture in the Age of Globalization, ed. Young, H.J. (Lanham: Lexington Books, 2002), 419–42, 437Google Scholar.

17 Eric Voegelin, Anamnesis, 335.

18 Eisenstadt, Shmuel Noah, “The Axial Age: The Emergence of Transcendental Visions and the Rise of Clerics,” AES 23 (1981): 294–314, 295, 297Google Scholar.

19 Ibid., 294.

20 Eisenstadt, Shmuel Noah, “The Axial Breakthroughs–Their Characteristics and Origins” in The Origins and Diversity of Axial Age Civilizations, ed. Eisenstadt, S. N. (New York: State University of New York Press, 1986), 1–25, 1Google Scholar.

21 Smith, William C., Faith and Belief (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1979), 130Google Scholar.

22 Voegelin, Eric, Collected Works, vol. 28, What Is History? and Other Late Unpublished Writings (Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 1999), 71, 87Google Scholar.

23 Shmuel Noah Eisenstadt, The Axial Age Breakthroughs, 4.

24 Ibid., 8.

25 Arnason, Johann Pall, “The Axial Conundrum. Between Historical Sociology and the Philosophy of History,” in Comparing Modernities, ed. Ben-Raffael, E. and Sternberg, Y. (Leiden: Brill, 2005), 57–81, 62–63Google Scholar.

26 Eisenstadt, Shmuel Noah, “The Axial Breakthrough in China and India,” in Eisenstadt, Axial Age Civilizations, 291–305, 292Google Scholar.

27 Hsiao, Kung-Ch'uan, A History of Chinese Political Thought 1 (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1979), 488–89Google Scholar; Weber-Schäfer, P., Oikumene und Imperium (München: Paul List, 1969), 228–30Google Scholar.

28 Cho-Yun Hsu, “Historical Conditions of the Emergence and Crystallization of the Confucian System,” in Eisenstadt, Axial Age Civilizations, 306–24, 315–17.

29 Voegelin, Eric, The Collected Works, vol. 14, Order and History 1, Israel and Revelation (Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 2001), 405–80Google Scholar.

30 Enßlin, Wilhelm, “Die Religionspolitik des Kaisers Theodosius des Großen,” in Die Kirche angesichts der Konstantinischen Wende, ed. Ruhbach, Gerhard (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1967), 87–111Google Scholar; Pitz, E., Die griechisch-römische Ökumene und die drei Kulturen des Mittelalters (Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 2001), 133–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Fuhrmann, Manfred, Rom in der Spätantike (München: Artemis und Winkler, 1994), 59–80Google Scholar.

31 Christian Meier, “The Emergence of an Autonomous Intelligence among the Greeks,” in Eisenstadt, Axial Age Civilizations, 65–91, 84.

32 Gebhardt, Jürgen, “The Origins of Politics in Ancient Hellas,” in Sophia and Praxis, ed. Porter, J.M. (Chatham: Chatham Hous Publishers, 1984), 11–31, 12–15Google Scholar.

33 Christian Meier, Emergence of an Autonomous Intelligence, 84.

34 Taylor, Philosophy and Human Sciences, 133.

35 Snell, Bruno, The Discovery of the Mind (New York: Harper & Brothers, 1960), 227–29Google Scholar.

36 Gebhardt, Jürgen, “The Concept of ‘the Political’ Revisited,” Philosophy, Literature and Politics, ed. Embry, Charles R. and Cooper, Barry (Columbia, MO: Missouri University Press, 2005), 209–22, 210–11Google Scholar.